• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 1516

In this coursework, I intend to investigate the differences of the products of the diagonally opposite corners of a rectangle, drawn on a 10x10 grid, with the squares numbered off 1 to 100

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Opposite Corners

Introduction

In this coursework, I intend to investigate the differences of the products of the diagonally opposite corners of a rectangle, drawn on a 10x10 grid, with the squares numbered off 1 to 100. I will aim to investigate the differences for rectangles that are aligned differently, of different lengths and widths.

Hypothesis

This coursework will aim to establish if there is a pattern from which we could derive a formula from the numbers in the grid.

Plan

The plan is to use Algebra to analyse the results which will be logged into tables. Subsequently I will test any rules, patterns and theories I find by using predictions and examples.

Methodology

To start with I will break up my work into sections, my first is:

2x3 Rectangles

I will concentrate on one particular aspect at a time.

What is the difference between the products of the corners?
Is the difference the same for a rectangle drawn anywhere in the grid?

image00.png

I now have several questions:

Is the difference different when the rectangle is aligned so that its shortest sides are at the top and bottom?

image01.png

What is the same between the two alignments?

What About Other Sizes of Rectangles?

I will now try rectangles, all in the 2 x X series, with different lengths.

...read more.

Middle

I believe I shall require only one example of each and will proceed on this principle.

3 x 3

image03.pngimage04.png

3 x 4

image05.pngimage06.png

3 x 5

image07.pngimage08.png

image09.png

What Do I Notice?

        The “L-1 x 5H” does not apply.                   But L-1 x 20 does.

I feel confidant that L-1 is correct but I still need to find how H can be used to calculate what to multiply L-1 by.

For 2 x X                L-1 x 10

For 3 x X                L-1 x 20

Could the universal rule be:                 D = L-1 x 10 x (H-1)?                        

Subtract one from the length, multiply by 10 and then multiply by the height subtracted by one?

Testing the Rule

4 x X

I will now look at 4 x X and see if my new found rule truly encompasses all rectangles.

4 x 4

image10.pngimage11.png

4 x 5

image13.pngimage14.png

The difference is advancing by 30.  4 x 6 will have a difference of 150.

4 x 6

image15.pngimage16.png

image17.png

(table calculated with a calculator)

Could the  x 10 in my rule be related to width of my number grid, which is ten squares wide?

To test this idea I will try my rule on a different sized grid.

image18.pngimage19.png

...read more.

Conclusion

image25.png

(X + L - 1) x (X + (G(H - 1))) = XxX + X (G + X(H - 1)) + L-1 X + L-1 (G  (H - 1))_

 X x  (X + (G(H - 1))) + L - 1) = XxX + X(G + X(H - 1)) + X L-1 _________________

L-1 (G (H - 1))

To Test This Expression

L-1 (G  (H-1))

Let us substitute the value of X for 1 in a 2x2 rectangle on a 10x10 grid and check that it calculates the square values correctly.

image26.png   So far so good

And now I will use the above expression to find the difference (which should be 10)

L-1 (G (H-1))

2-1 (10 (2-1))                        

1 x (10 x 1)

1x 10 = 10

It seems fine so far.

I will now check it with a 3 x 4 rectangle on a 10x10 grid.  I know the difference should be 60 from previous workings.

L-1 (G (H-1))

4-1 x (10 (3-1))

3    x (10 (2))

3    x 20 = 60

The expression is true!

L-1 (G (H-1)) is the universal rule with the brackets in different positions:

L-1 (G (H-1)) = L-1 x (Grid Width) x (H-1) = Difference

Evaluation

I believe I have completed my aims and succeeded in attaining the goals I set myself.  I have found the rule to work out the difference for any rectangle of any size on any grid.  I have done this through the use of algebraic methods.

I have taken this course work as far as I can in the time that I have been allotted. I am happy with the work that I have done and can not think of anything I could have carried out better or improved upon.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

***
This is a reasonably well structured investigation. It uses a wide variety of experimental examples to support a discovered pattern. To improve this more algebraic expressions to represent the differences need to be included. Specific strengths and improvements have been suggested throughout.

Marked by teacher Cornelia Bruce 18/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    opposite corners

    5 star(s)

    For instance I could instead of having; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5... I could have; 2, 4, 6, 8, 10... as I have in the last few investigations I will only use algebra as numbers as well are to time consuming.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Opposite Corners. In this coursework, to find a formula from a set of numbers ...

    4 star(s)

    47 48 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 In an 8�8 square: 1 � 78 = 78 8 � 71 = 568 The difference between the products is 490.

  1. Number stairs

    numbers in 3-step stair added together so for this 3-step stair the stair total is 516 On the right is a portion of the 11 x 11 grid squares and there is 6 boxes which are representing the numbers 100, 89, 90, 78, 79, 80 and these are the 3-step

  2. GCSE Maths Sequences Coursework

    Spatial Justification Now that I have found that my formulae are correct by making predictions then proving them, I will now use diagrams to spatially justify my formula and explain why these formulae work. I will use two different stages of the sequence in each justification to ensure this is true in all cases.

  1. Opposite Corners Investigation

    36 37 38 39 40 10 x 31 = 310 1 x 40 = 40 = 270 I'm now going to see whether the corners have any algebraic relation to each other. 1 10 21 30 1 10 41 50 X X+(N-1)

  2. Number Grid Coursework

    - a(a + 11) a2 + 10a + a + 10 - {a2 + 11a} a2 + 11a + 10 - a2 - 11a a2 - a2 + 11a - 11a + 10 10 The formula works because the "10" term is only produced in the expansion of the two

  1. Number Grid Investigation.

    3 x 3 = 40 4 x 4 = ? = 40 + 30 (p.d.) + 20 = 90. The difference between each p.d. increases by 20 on the previous one each time, (see increase T.2.) Therefore, this can be shown as M+20, where M is the difference previously. E.g.

  2. How many squares in a chessboard n x n

    5th square,U5 =12 + 22 + 32 + 42 + 52 6th square, U6 = 12 + 22 + 32 + 42 + 52 + 62 7th square, U7 = 12 + 22 + 32 + 42 + 52 + 62 + 72 8th square, U8 = 12 + 22

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work