160 174
152 177 162 152 168 176 170 167 160 160 156 175 152 167 176 175 173 187 160 163
171 172
174 170
163 165
157 171
163 166
175 174
159 169
168 170
= 3264/20 =3380/20
=163.2cm =169cm
Average for year 10 girls =172 + Year 10 boys = 173
171 179
162 171 167 180
152 179
167 177 170 161 159 163 163 179 177 164 165 184 155 173
166 170
171 166
169 174
154 172
173 180
170 176
172 164
169 172
=3324/20 =3457/20
=166.2cm =172.85cm
Average for year 11 girls = 180 + Year 11 boys = 186
174 188
170 178 167 172
175 181 171 183
176 175
168 186
165 180
176 185
157 177
- 179
172 182
165 181
173 177
171 179
168 183
167 173
170 177
=3234/19 =2422/19
=170.21cm =180.11cm
In the table above I have shown all three years averages, both genders.
My tables show that boys, on average are taller than girls. The boys have been taller than girls in all three years. They have also shown the most growth increase, the biggest increase being in years 10 to 11, where, on average, they grew 7.26cm. This must be when boys have their growth spurts, years 10-11. Since the girls have shown no major increase in height between the years, I can presume that they had there growth spurts between the years 7 and 9.
My results support my hypothesis. I stated that boys are taller than girls and, on average, that is correct. As you can see, on the box and whisker plots, the year 9 boys have the most spread out data, ranging from 150cm to 187cm. The year 11 boys are, by far, on average, the tallest. Their data is squashed up onto the right hand side of the page, towards the higher end of the scale.
Pie Chart Calculations
I am going to draw a pie chart to show the increase in height between years in both the boys and girls. As you can see from the tables, the girls increased in height 3cm from year 9 to 10 and 4.01cm from year 10 to 11. The boys, however, grew, on average, 3.85cm from year 9 to 10 and 7.26cm from year 10 to 11.
girls boys
Years 9-10 = 3cm increase Years 9-10 = 3.85cm increase
Years 10-11 = 4.01cm increase Years 10-11 = 7.26cm increase
Total = 3 + 4.01 + 3.85 + 7.26
= 18.12
3 / 18.12 3.85 / 18.12
= 0.165 x 360 = 0.212 x 360
= 59.60% = 76.49%
4.01 / 18.12 7.26 / 18.12
= 0.221 x 360 = 0.401 x 360
=79.90% = 144.36%
I will compare my results to a much larger source, to find out whether my results are accurate. In this work I will be comparing to Mayfield data. I will take a sample of 60 pupil’s data from each gender.
I only have a limited amount of data, if I had more data, then the investigation is likely to be less biased.
To further my investigation, I thought that it might be useful to find out whether tall people are more intelligent than shorter people. I have the secondary data, the Mayfield data, which has pupil’s heights and IQ score on.
Standard Deviation
Seen as the boys have their growth spurts in year 10, I will use standard deviation to compare their heights to year 10 girls heights.
Year 9 Girls
Total 1391.2
Variance=1391.2/20 = 69.56
Standard Deviation = 69.56
= 8.34 (to 2 d.p)
Year 9 Boys
Total 1374
Variance = 1374/20 = 68.7
Standard Deviation = 68.7
= 8.29 (to 2 d.p)
Year 10 Girls
Total 1021.76
Variance = 1021.76/20 = 51.088
Standard Deviation = 51.088
= 7.15 (to 2 d.p)
Year 10 Boys
Total 822.5525
Variance = 822.5525/20 = 41.13
Standard Deviation = 41.13
= 6.41 (to 2 d.p)
Year 11 Girls
Total 473.1579
Variance = 473.1579/19 = 24.90
Standard Deviation = 24.90
= 4. 98 (to 2 d.p)
Year 11 Boys
Total 355.8488
Variance = 355.8488/19 = 18.73
Standard Deviation = 18.73
= 4.32
From the tables above you can see that, the higher the standard deviation, the more spread out the data is.
Hypothesis
I predict that the taller, the person, the higher their IQ will be.
From the Mayfield data, I will take 60 pieces of data. This is enough to represent the population, without being too much to deal with.
Plan
For my sampling, I am going to use random cluster sampling. I have chosen this kind of sampling because if a large number of small clusters are chosen, it is unlikely to be unrepresentative of the population. I will divide the population into groups of 10. Each group will contain 10 pieces of data. I will randomly pick 6 groups from all the groups.
Once I have collected my data, I will put them into order of IQ, starting from the lowest going up to the highest. I will put the heights next to them and study the data.
To present my data I will use a bar chart, with heights on the x axis and IQ on the y-axis. On the x-axis, I will split the heights into categories, such as 145cm-149cm. The smaller the group, the more accurate the results will be.
In order of IQ,
I will have 6 groups, 1.35-1.44, 1.45-154, 1.55-1.64, 1.65-1.74, 1.75-1.84 and 1.85-1.94. I will put all the above data into one of the height categories. I will take their IQ and find the average. The problem with using the above data is that there will be more people in some categories than others. The categories that have more people in will average out an average that is more representative of the heights of the whole population. This is because I am using more pupils’ data, rather than just a few peoples. Because I only have one piece of data for the group, 185-194cm, I will add more pieces of data. I will select another cluster of data and add the heights that are in the category 185-194cm.
Group 135cm-144cm- 3 pieces of data. 136, 99. 141, 101. 140, 108.
Average IQ= 99+101+108= 308/3
= 102.6
Group 145cm-154cm- 16 pieces of data. 149, 72. 145, 84. 149, 87. 151, 89. 153, 96. 154, 97. 151, 99. 154, 99. 150, 100. 153, 100. 152, 100. 152, 100. 148, 103. 152, 103. 145, 103. 147, 107.
Average IQ= 72+84+87+89+96+97+99+99+100+100+100+100+103+103+103+103+107= 1642/16
=102.
Group 155cm-164cm- 19 pieces of data. 161, 88. 156, 97. 164, 98. 162, 98. 162, 98. 155, 99. 162, 100. 155, 100. 163, 100. 160, 100. 159, 101. 158, 103. 163, 103. 162, 104. 158, 105. 163, 106. 163, 106. 162, 122. 160, 134.
Average IQ= 88+97+98+98+98+99+100+100+100+100+101+103+103+103+104+105+106+106+122+134= 2065/19
= 108.6
Group 165cm-174cm- 17 pieces of data. 167, 89. 173, 90. 171, 90. 167, 94. 165, 94. 170, 97. 167, 100. 168, 102. 165, 102. 167, 105. 165, 106. 165, 107. 173, 108. 172, 109. 170, 110. 174, 117. 165, 102.
Average IQ= 89+90+90+94+94+97+100+102+102+105+106+107+108+109+110+117+102= 1722/17
= 101.3
Group 175cm-184cm- 4 pieces of data. 175, 90. 180, 102. 180, 116. 176, 122.
Average IQ= 90+102+116+122= 430/4
= 107.5
Group 185cm-194cm- 1 piece of data. 186, 103.
Added data= 190, 113. 187, 124.
Average IQ= 103+113+124= 340/3
= 113.3
As you can see from the data, the highest IQ, on average, is the group, 185cm-194cm with the average IQ of 113.3. This is the tallest group. As you can see from my bar chart, the 185-194cm group were, by far the highest, with the 155-164cm group, the second highest IQ. The group with the least IQ were group 165-174cm.
Looking at my results, I have found that there is no correlation between height and IQ. The bar chart shows no pattern or trend.
As you can see from the scatter graph there is no correlation. I couldn’t draw a line of best fit because of this.
Interpretation of overall results
I have found that the first results I got, from comparing height between girls and boys, supported my hypothesis. I predicted that boys would be taller than girls and that their data would be more spread out than girl’s data. My findings supported this.
In my second line of enquiry, people who are taller have a higher IQ than people who are shorter, my results contradicted my hypothesis. I predicted that taller people would have a higher IQ than shorter. My findings did not support this.
In my first line of enquiry, I found out that boys are, on average, taller than girls. However, in my second line of enquiry, I found that even if the person is taller, it doesn’t mean they are more intelligent, so the boys, even thought they are taller, are not necessarily more intelligent than girls.
My results, although accurate, with the sample I took, are possibly not representative of the whole population. I only had a limited source of data, one of which was secondary data so I don’t know how it was collected and could possibly be bias. I only had a limited sample size; it may have been more representative if I had taken a larger sample size. Mayfield and Ridgewood School are just two schools, out of thousands in the country. A sample of pupils from every school would be representative of the whole population, however, trying to collect this, would be very expensive and time consuming.
I could compare my results to a much larger secondary source, which would be more representative of the population. The census at schools data shows you the average height for each year group.
Height Data – Census At School Initial Results Feb 2001
Year 9 girls are aged 13 to 14. So if I take the average of the columns;
13 and under 13.5
13.5 and under 14
14 and under 15
Then I should get the average for year 9 girls.
157.18+159.36+161.69= 478.23/3
= 159.41
My average for year 9 girls was 163.2cm so my results are over the average of census at schools.
Year 9 boys
156.97+161.62+166.80= 485.39/3
= 161.80
My average for the year 9 boys is 169cm so my results are over the average of census at schools.
Year 10 Girls
Year 10 girls are aged 14 to 15 so I will use the column, 14 and under 15.
The average for the census at school is 161.69cm, my average is 166.2cm. My results are over the census at schools.
Year 10 Boys
My average for the year 10 boys is 172.85cm. The census at schools average for year 10 boys is 166.80. My results are over the census at schools results.
Year 11 Girls
For the year 11 girls and boys I will use the column, 15 and under 16. The census at schools average for year 11 girls is 162.84cm. My results for year 11 girls are 170.21cm. My results are over the census at schools results.
Year 11 Boys
My average for year 11 boys was 180.11cm. This was over the census at schools, which were 172.69.
My results for every year and both genders were above the average of census at schools.
Conclusion
Although, comparing my results to a larger source of secondary data, they were over the average of my secondary source; my results have supported my hypothesis.
My results are different to the larger secondary source, but there is not a very dramatic increase between the two sets of data. So, my results are meaningful and are representative of the population.
My results could be used in the real world with things such as cloth sizes. Cloth manufacturers know what size to make clothes for the different age groups and genders and they will know how size varies between the years and genders.