• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 1991

Investigating the height to weight ratio between boys and girls to see how diverse each gender's ratio is if any differentiation.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE Maths Coursework – Data Handling

Line of enquiry

I will be investigating the height to weight ratio between boys and girls to see how diverse each gender’s ratio is if any differentiation.

Hypothesis

I believe that the boys are generally taller and heavier than girls.

Collecting the data

The secondary data I was presented with contained the statistics of 100 students, 50 boys and 50 girls. In this project I will take a random sample of 25 boys and 25 girls from the secondary data that has been provided, and record their heights, weights, gender and amount of TV they watch per week for possible further investigation. To randomly select 25 of the students, I used the random function times fifty (amount of students in each gender) and marked each student until I had 25 girls and 25 boys.

Primary Data

Here are two tables (below and next page) of the random sample of each gender and their statistics:

Males

Number

Yr Grp

Height(m)

Weight(kg)

Average TV watched per week(hrs)

1

9

1.60

60

42

2

10

1.75

45

14

3

8

1.70

49

9

4

9

1.75

63

15

5

9

1.50

70

17

6

8

1.55

51

10.5

7

8

1.56

40

9

8

11

1.65

54

30

9

9

1.48

40

20

10

7

1.47

41

4

11

8

1.60

41

8

12

9

1.70

47

12

13

7

1.42

40

17

14

8

1.55

68

13

15

9

1.60

40

10

16

7

1.50

40

15

17

8

1.48

26

12

18

11

1.68

56

12

19

11

1.84

78

14

20

11

2.06

84

20

21

9

1.56

53

15

22

10

1.54

54

18

23

7

1.49

35

9

24

7

1.62

45

17

25

7

1.52

42

14

Average:

~

1.61

50.48

15.06

1

Females

Number

Yr Grp

Height(m)

Weight(kg)

Average TV watched per week(hrs)

1

10

1.40

45

10

2

7

1.51

50

14

3

11

1.69

51

20

4

7

1.59

54

20

5

9

1.80

62

6

6

11

1.72

51

10

7

7

1.51

50

16

8

11

1.03

45

5

9

10

1.66

45

12

10

7

1.41

40

10

11

11

1.60

45

38

12

11

1.55

60

38

13

9

1.51

65

7

14

7

1.42

48

7

15

11

1.52

45

19

16

8

1.60

42

8

17

9

1.53

48

18

18

7

1.60

47

19

19

10

1.61

54

17

20

8

1.54

57

22

21

10

1.80

50

15

22

8

1.53

47

15

23

9

1.65

48

20

24

8

1.70

58

18

25

9

1.53

58

20

Average:

~

1.56

50.6

16.16

...read more.

Middle

image04.png

From these scatter graphs I have gathered that the boys in my primary data sample, are generally taller. Although the weight range for girls seems to be a lot smaller than the boys, the average weight for the girls is higher.

3

Frequency polygon for boy’s and girl’s heights

Males

Females

~1.40

0

2

1.41~1.50

5

2

1.51~1.60

11

13

1.61~1.70

5

5

1.71~1.80

2

3

1.81~1.90

1

0

1.90~2.00

0

0

2.01~2.10

1

0

image05.png

From this chart we can see the mode height for both boys and girls is between 1.51 metres and 1.60 metres. The range of heights is wider for the boys than the girls.

Frequency polygon for boy’s and girl’s weights

Males

Females

21~30

1

0

31~40

6

1

41~50

7

14

51~60

6

8

61~70

3

2

71~80

1

0

81~90

1

0

4

image06.png

Like the height frequency graph, the mode for both boys and girls is the same. The mode weight is between 41kg and 50kg. Additionally, once again the range of weights is wider for the boys than it is for the girls. To differentiate between the heights to weight ratios properly we have to take into account the year groups.

Extension

There

...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion

Summary:

I was first inquiring into the general height to weight ratio between the girls and boys that I was presented with, but the results I got in my scatter graphs were too close for me to come to any sharp conclusion. So I extended my project to look at the height to weight ratio between the boys and girls in the lower half of the school and the boys and girls in the upper half of the school.

Hypothesis:

I found that at in the early years of school the girls are both taller and heavier than boys, which did, in fact, disprove my hypothesis that boys and girls are the same height and weight during the early years of secondary school as an element of the extended hypothesis. Towards the later years in secondary school, boys were both taller and heavier.

Revised hypothesis:

In the earlier years of secondary school girls tend to be taller and heavier than boys, but as the years progress the boys grow taller and heavier than the girls.

By Laurence Osborne

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Mayfield. HYPOTHESIS 1: Boys at Mayfield School are Taller and Weigh more on ...

    opinion is generally quite high and the Interquartile Range that I will be finding at a later stage will help me view the spread of data and the margin of error. I believe that all the graphs that I will produce will help me complete my objective and conclude efficiently and successfully.

  2. Maths Statistics Coursework - relationship between the weight and height

    This indicates to me that the inter-quartile range is smaller also. The box and whisker diagram shows that the girls' inter-quartile range is 4cm more than the boys. This suggests that the boys' heights are less spread out but they are more compressed at a higher median.

  1. Conduct an investigation comparing height and weight from pupils in Mayfield School.

    172 + 158 + 160 + 157 + 152 + 174 + 162 + 170 + 161 + 163 + 158 + 162 + 133 + 178 + 165 + 160 25 = 162m x x - 162 (x - 162)� 160 -2 4 163 1 1 168 6 36

  2. An Investigation into the height to length ratio of Limpets on exposed and sheltered ...

    This means the investigations will commence at this time on each day respectively. * On arrival, each of the abiotic factors will be measured and noted. * Temperature will be measured in �C, using a thermometer. * Wind Speed will be measured using an anemometer in ms-1.

  1. The effect of drop jump height on spinal shrinkage.

    to the increased landing forces being absorbed by the intervertebral fluid contained between the vertrebral discs. The non significant difference in PGRF in the trials may possibly be due to the landing techniques adopted by the subjects. The method a subject uses to land after performing the drop jump may

  2. The media are a primary factor governing the circulation of subculture

    The main concern for this is the "definitive expressions of physicality" (McDermott, 1996:13). Physicality is linked to power and thus male physical power and masculinity. Hargreaves' (1986) ideas on the connections between male power, muscularity, and masculinity suggests that male power is symbolized in the muscularity of the male body, which in turn is a key indicator of masculinity.

  1. Height and Weight corralarion in boys and girls

    60 kg and the ranks were 15, 16 and 17, I would add the ranks up to make 48 and dived it by 3 so the rank of the three peoples weight would be 16. I did this for both the height and the weight.

  2. mayfield course work -boys are generally heavier than girl. This has to do with ...

    36 1.55 - 1.59 | 1 36 1.60 - 1.64 || 2 72 1.65 - 1.69 |||| 4 144 1.70 - 1.74 | 1 36 1.75 - 1.79 |||| 5 180 || 2 72 1.8 - 1.84 ||| 3 108 1.85 - 1.89 | 1 36 With reference to table

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work