• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 1991

Investigating the height to weight ratio between boys and girls to see how diverse each gender's ratio is if any differentiation.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE Maths Coursework – Data Handling

Line of enquiry

I will be investigating the height to weight ratio between boys and girls to see how diverse each gender’s ratio is if any differentiation.

Hypothesis

I believe that the boys are generally taller and heavier than girls.

Collecting the data

The secondary data I was presented with contained the statistics of 100 students, 50 boys and 50 girls. In this project I will take a random sample of 25 boys and 25 girls from the secondary data that has been provided, and record their heights, weights, gender and amount of TV they watch per week for possible further investigation. To randomly select 25 of the students, I used the random function times fifty (amount of students in each gender) and marked each student until I had 25 girls and 25 boys.

Primary Data

Here are two tables (below and next page) of the random sample of each gender and their statistics:

Males

Number

Yr Grp

Height(m)

Weight(kg)

Average TV watched per week(hrs)

1

9

1.60

60

42

2

10

1.75

45

14

3

8

1.70

49

9

4

9

1.75

63

15

5

9

1.50

70

17

6

8

1.55

51

10.5

7

8

1.56

40

9

8

11

1.65

54

30

9

9

1.48

40

20

10

7

1.47

41

4

11

8

1.60

41

8

12

9

1.70

47

12

13

7

1.42

40

17

14

8

1.55

68

13

15

9

1.60

40

10

16

7

1.50

40

15

17

8

1.48

26

12

18

11

1.68

56

12

19

11

1.84

78

14

20

11

2.06

84

20

21

9

1.56

53

15

22

10

1.54

54

18

23

7

1.49

35

9

24

7

1.62

45

17

25

7

1.52

42

14

Average:

~

1.61

50.48

15.06

1

Females

Number

Yr Grp

Height(m)

Weight(kg)

Average TV watched per week(hrs)

1

10

1.40

45

10

2

7

1.51

50

14

3

11

1.69

51

20

4

7

1.59

54

20

5

9

1.80

62

6

6

11

1.72

51

10

7

7

1.51

50

16

8

11

1.03

45

5

9

10

1.66

45

12

10

7

1.41

40

10

11

11

1.60

45

38

12

11

1.55

60

38

13

9

1.51

65

7

14

7

1.42

48

7

15

11

1.52

45

19

16

8

1.60

42

8

17

9

1.53

48

18

18

7

1.60

47

19

19

10

1.61

54

17

20

8

1.54

57

22

21

10

1.80

50

15

22

8

1.53

47

15

23

9

1.65

48

20

24

8

1.70

58

18

25

9

1.53

58

20

Average:

~

1.56

50.6

16.16

...read more.

Middle

image04.png

From these scatter graphs I have gathered that the boys in my primary data sample, are generally taller. Although the weight range for girls seems to be a lot smaller than the boys, the average weight for the girls is higher.

3

Frequency polygon for boy’s and girl’s heights

Males

Females

~1.40

0

2

1.41~1.50

5

2

1.51~1.60

11

13

1.61~1.70

5

5

1.71~1.80

2

3

1.81~1.90

1

0

1.90~2.00

0

0

2.01~2.10

1

0

image05.png

From this chart we can see the mode height for both boys and girls is between 1.51 metres and 1.60 metres. The range of heights is wider for the boys than the girls.

Frequency polygon for boy’s and girl’s weights

Males

Females

21~30

1

0

31~40

6

1

41~50

7

14

51~60

6

8

61~70

3

2

71~80

1

0

81~90

1

0

4

image06.png

Like the height frequency graph, the mode for both boys and girls is the same. The mode weight is between 41kg and 50kg. Additionally, once again the range of weights is wider for the boys than it is for the girls. To differentiate between the heights to weight ratios properly we have to take into account the year groups.

Extension

There

...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion

Summary:

I was first inquiring into the general height to weight ratio between the girls and boys that I was presented with, but the results I got in my scatter graphs were too close for me to come to any sharp conclusion. So I extended my project to look at the height to weight ratio between the boys and girls in the lower half of the school and the boys and girls in the upper half of the school.

Hypothesis:

I found that at in the early years of school the girls are both taller and heavier than boys, which did, in fact, disprove my hypothesis that boys and girls are the same height and weight during the early years of secondary school as an element of the extended hypothesis. Towards the later years in secondary school, boys were both taller and heavier.

Revised hypothesis:

In the earlier years of secondary school girls tend to be taller and heavier than boys, but as the years progress the boys grow taller and heavier than the girls.

By Laurence Osborne

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Mayfield. HYPOTHESIS 1: Boys at Mayfield School are Taller and Weigh more on ...

    opinion is generally quite high and the Interquartile Range that I will be finding at a later stage will help me view the spread of data and the margin of error. I believe that all the graphs that I will produce will help me complete my objective and conclude efficiently and successfully.

  2. Maths Statistics Coursework - relationship between the weight and height

    However, the length of the box in the diagram shows differently. Since the standard deviation is more accurate and reliable, I will use that instead of the inter-quartile range given in the box and whisker plot. The lower quartile for the boys is 5cm more than the girls suggesting that

  1. Conduct an investigation comparing height and weight from pupils in Mayfield School.

    25 162 0 0 133 -29 841 178 16 256 165 3 9 160 -2 4 Sum of squared deviations 1947 Variance = 1947 = 77.88 25 Standard Deviation = V77.88 = 8.8 (to 1 d.p) The average deviation from the mean is 8.8.

  2. The effect of drop jump height on spinal shrinkage.

    A linear regression, Pearson's test enabled an evaluation of the relationship between peak hip velocities (m/s-1) and block height among the subjects, and revealed a significant correlation, reporting; r = 0.933, P < 0.01. The result indicating a high correlation between peak hip velocity (m/s-1)

  1. The media are a primary factor governing the circulation of subculture

    Barrow, or 'Joe Louis' was also a classic case of lower class society and broken personal history. "[H]e was from a broken home, moved with his mother to Detroit at the age of six, dropped out of school when he was eleven and ran in the streets until a friend introduced him to boxing" (Sugden, 1996:36).

  2. Data Handling Project : Heights of Girls

    First of all I will look at the diagram for weight, the males are definitely heavier then the females by year 11. The lower quartile of the males nearly surpasses the upper quartile of the females. This shows me that nearly 75% of the males are heavier then the bottom 75% of the females.

  1. Height and Weight corralarion in boys and girls

    The results are shown below Year Group Male Female Total 7 151 131 282 8 145 125 270 9 118 143 261 10 106 94 200 11 84 86 170 Total 604 579 1183 Formula example = 151/ 604 = 0.25 * 30 = 7.5 Year Group Male Female 7

  2. mayfield course work -boys are generally heavier than girl. This has to do with ...

    50 20.8 54 11 16 10 Female 1.61 45 17.4 82 11 16 8 Female 1.60 55 21.5 84 11 16 8 Female 1.69 50 17.5 1 11 16 2 Male 1.67 66 23.7 5 11 16 0 Male 1.91 82 22.5 7 11 16 2 Male 1.80 60 18.5

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work