• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigating what affects the time taken for a paper helicopter to reach the ground.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE Physics CourseworkNtami Egbe

Aims:

I am investigating what affects the time taken for a paper helicopter to reach the ground

Variables:

The variables in the experiment that I have found are: distance from the ground, weight of the helicopter and surface area of wings.

The variable I have chosen to alter in my investigation is the surface area of the wings.

Apparatus

To carry out the investigation I will need to have the following equipment:

Stopwatch

Pencil

Ruler

A3 paper

4m ruler

Scissors

Paper clips

Top pan balance

My helicopter will be constructed as shown in the diagram above


To collect my I will be dropping my helicopter from 4m and will record the times with a stopwatch. I have chosen to drop the helicopter from 4m, because in our preliminary studies we discovered that 2m or 3m didn’t give the helicopter enough time to begin rotating, and at such a short height the human reaction time proved to slow by 0.15 of a second, which made our result less accurate. 4m allowed all the above to happen without discounting our results

My prediction

...read more.

Middle

2)

1

2

3

Average time (s)

160cm2

4.82 s

2.68 s

3.03 s

3.51 s

90cm2

2.43 s

2.31 s

2.36 s

2.36 s

48cm2

2.06 s

2.13 s

2.23 s

2.14 s

42cm2

1.89 s

2.03 s

1.98 s

1.97 s

36cm2

1.56 s

1.68 s

1.78 s

1.67 s

Analysis

The pattern shown in the graph is that as the surface area of the helicopter decreased so did the time taken for the helicopter to reach the ground the graph has a smooth curve and seems to fit a pattern, apart from one point, which seems to be an anomaly at 3.51s. It seems to far out, and if this point was at maybe 2.85s then it would fit with the smooth curve, and not seem as disjointed.

...read more.

Conclusion

Anomalous results:

Because my results weren’t totally accurate I did experience anomalous results. The result 4.82s was an anomaly because it’s almost double the lowest reading of 2.68s. This caused the average to be 3.51, while an average of 2.90 would look more reasonable.

Conclusion:

I think that my investigation went well and that for a further I would like to look at a different variable like weight perhaps. If I could improve my experiment I would use more accurate equipment and do more  readings if possible. I would choose an area that was flat so I wouldn’t have any difficulties and problems with steps, that would improve the accuracy of the results. I would also construct more than one helicopter, but they would all have the same weight. I would make more than one because when the helicopter was falling it became damaged, and this would affect the results. The conclusion I have deduced is: as surface area decreases as does the time taken for a paper helicopter to fall 4m.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Fencing Problem section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Fencing Problem essays

  1. Geography Investigation: Residential Areas

    In today's society, that just isn't big enough for a couple who want to start a family etc, so they want to leave. So far my hypothesis had been proved correct with the two studies I have done so far, the final section of this hypothesis I am going to

  2. Fencing problem.

    Height of one triangle Tan 1/2 Interior angle * 1/2 Base Tan [180 - (360 � 2N)] * 1/2 (1000 � N) Area of one triangle 1/2 * Base * Height 1000 � 2N * Tan [180 - (360 � 2N)] * 1/2 (1000 � N)

  1. Maths GCSE Courswork

    Area = base x height / 2 = 380 x 244.95 / 2 = 93081 / 2 = 46540.5m2 OR Heron's Formula: Area = = 500 (500 - 310)(500 - 380)(500 - 310) = 2166000000 = V2166000000 = 46540.5m2 The area of this isosceles triangle is 46540.5m2.

  2. Arceology paper

    To go along with these methods, as well as to map the entire area, aerial photography may be useful if the site is an open area. If the area were a woodland area, this technique would not work well and should be substituted with topographic survey.

  1. How do people feel about the changes that have taken place on Portobello road ...

    all traders have to offer high quality goods, by displaying better merchandise. She also states that improving the environment will create a more clean and spacious environment for everyone, especially tourists. Lastly she suggests the need for friendly and efficient service in order to satisfy customers.

  2. Operation Cedar Falls.

    The average distance was about 200 meters. Operation Cedar Falls would begin on 8 January 1967. The mission: Forces, Vietnam, attacks the Iron Triangle and the Thanh Dien Forestry Reserve to destroy enemy forces, infrastructure, installations, and Military headquarters; evacuates civilian population; and establishes the Iron Triangle as a specified

  1. An Investigation into the Varying Isoperimetric Quotients of Differing Shapes.

    When I find the area of the segment to find the area of the square all I will have to do is times the area of the segment by eight because the segment is 1/8 of the square. O H h 90 45 A x/2 H= Hypotenuse O=Opposite A=Adjacent h=height Using trigonometry.

  2. The object of this exercise is to face the arrowhead in the opposite direction ...

    *(2a + (b-1)d) = [b *(b+1)] / 2 Therefore, number of counters in the triangle, nb = [b*(b+1)] / 2 TESTING EQN FOR NUMBER OF COUNTERS Number of counters in triangle which has a base of 4 counters is denoted as n4 n4 = 4*(4+1)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work