• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  27. 27
    27
  28. 28
    28
  29. 29
    29
  30. 30
    30
  31. 31
    31
  32. 32
    32
  33. 33
    33
  34. 34
    34
  35. 35
    35
  36. 36
    36
  37. 37
    37
  38. 38
    38
  39. 39
    39
  40. 40
    40
  41. 41
    41
  42. 42
    42
  43. 43
    43
  44. 44
    44
  45. 45
    45
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 4850

isopometric quotients

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Cara Foley 10i

Isoperimetric Quotients

Isoperimetric Quotients of plane shapes are calculated using the formula:

I.Q. = 4π x Area of shape

(Perimeter of shape)²

I am going to investigate isoperimetric quotients of plane shapes and interpret my findings.

Firstly, I am going to look at flat shapes. Using the formula, I will calculate the isoperimetric quotients of the shapes.  Starting with the smallest 2D shape- a triangle- I will calculate the I.Q s of right-angled triangles. I will also do this with isosceles and equilateral triangles. I will move on to quadrilaterals and look at the I.Q s. Maybe there will be something about the results that will help me with further plane shapes; pentagon, hexagon, heptagon, nonagon, decagon and possibly a circle. With comparison, the results might show something about the shapes, such as a pattern.

Triangles

I am now going to study right-angled triangles.

Right-angled triangles

I will first look at the 3, 4, 5 right-angled triangles and then enlargements of it.

1.     image00.png

Perimeter= 3+4+5= 12 cm

Area= ½ x 4 x 3= 6cm²

I.Q. = 4 x π x 6

                    12²

I.Q. = 0.5236

I will look at similar enlarged right-angled triangles, based on the 3, 4, 5 triangle.

2.  image00.png

Perimeter= 6+8+10= 24 cm

Area= ½ x 6 x 8= 24 cm ²

I.Q= 4 x π x 24

                   24²

I.Q. = 0.5236

3.image00.png

Perimeter= 16+20+12=48 cm

Area= ½ x 16 x 12= 96 cm²

I.Q. = 4 x πx 96

48²

=0.5236

Similar 345 right-angled triangles have the same I.Q. The answers are all the same.  I predict that similar enlarged shapes make the same I.Q. answer.

I am now going to look at other right-angled triangles that are not versions of the 3, 4, 5.

Other right angled triangles

Firstly, in these triangles, I will need to find the hypotenuse length so I will use Pythagoras’ theorem.

4. image00.png

Hypotenuse = 4² + 6² = 52

                           =    √52

                           = 7. 2111 cm

Perimeter = 4+6+7.2111

                     = 17.2111 cm

Area= ½ x 4 x 6

           = 12 cm ²

I.Q. = 4 x π x 12

              17.2111²

I.Q. = 0.5090

5.  image00.png

H = 8²+ 12² = 208

=208

       = 14.422 cm

P = 12+8+14.422

     = 34.422

A = ½ x 8 x 12

      = 48

I.Q. = 4 x π x 48

               34.422²

I.Q. = 0.5090

6. image00.png

H = 3² + 2² = 13

      = 13

      = 3.6

P = 3+2+3.6

    = 8.6

A= ½ x 2 x 3

      = 3

I.Q. = 4 x π x 3

                  8.6²

I.Q. = 0.5097

7.image00.png

...read more.

Middle

Parallelogram

I will now look at parallelograms. I think that the I.Q. s will be less than that of a square but enlarged versions will have equal I.Q. s. Different parallelograms, however, will have different I.Q. s.

1. image07.png

C² = a² + b²

C² = 5² + 3²

C² = 34

C    = 34

C    = 5.830951895

P = 5.830951895 + 5.830951895 + 7 + 7

     = 25.66190379

A = 7 x 5 = 35

I.Q. = 4 x π x 35

              25.66190379²

I.Q. = 0.667882652

I will now look at an enlargement of the above parallelogram.

2. image07.png

C² = a² + b²

C² = 10² + 6²

C² = 136

C    = 136

C    = 11.66190379

P = 11.66190379 + 11.66190379 + 14 + 14

    = 51.32380758

A = 14 x 10 = 140

I.Q. = 4 x π x 140

            51.32380758²

I.Q. = 0.667882652

The I.Q. s were equal. I will now look at different parallelograms.

3.   image07.png

C² = a² + b²

C² = 6² + 4²

C² = 52

C    = 52

C    = 7.211102551

P= 7.211102551 + 7.211102551 + 9 +9

   = 32.4222051

A = 9 x 6 = 54

I.Q. = 4 x π x 54

             32.4222051²

I.Q. = 0.645533115

Here is an enlargement. I predict that it will have the same I.Q. as the above shape.

4. image07.png

C² = a² + b²

C² = 12² + 8²

C² = 208

C    = 208

C    = 14.4222051

P = 14.4222051 + 14.4222051 + 18 +18

    = 64.8444102

A = 18 x 12 = 216

I.Q. = 4 x π x 216

             64.8444102²

I.Q.= 0.645533115

The I.Q. s of the enlarged parallelograms are equal. My prediction was correct; the I.Q. s of parallelograms are less than that of a square.

I will now construct a table comparing the I.Q. s of my quadrilaterals.

Table of results for I.Q. s of Quadrilaterals

Square

I.Q

1

0.78539163

2

0.78539163

3

0.78539163

4

0.78539163

Rectangle

I.Q

1

0.736310778

2

0.736310778

3

0.502654824

4

0.502654824

1

0.120637157

2

0.384684814

3

0.623125815

4

0.753982236

Parallelogram

I.Q.

1

0.667882652

2

0.667882652

3

0.645533115

4

0.645533115

Enlarged similar quadrilaterals have the same I.Q. s Squares, a regular plane shape, have the largest I.Q. s of quadrilaterals. All square I.Q. s are the same.

Regular shapes have the largest I.Q. s out of their ‘family’ of shapes.

I can now just study regular shapes.

Regular pentagons

I will now look at regular pentagons.

image08.png

  To find the sum of the interior angles of a polygon, I can use the formula:

180(n-2) where n represents the number of sides.

For a pentagon

180(5-2) = 180 x 3 = 540°

Because I am looking at a regular pentagon each angle equals:

...read more.

Conclusion

°

40

50

0.99868

π Tan 86.4°

50

60

0.999

π Tan 87°

60

75

0.9994

π Tan 87.6°

75

90

0.99959

π Tan 88°

90

100

0.99967

π Tan 88.2°

100

My attached graph shows all of my results.

The following is a computer-generated version of my graph.

image15.png

As my graph is based on my table, it shows similar results. However, I can conclude that as the number of sides of a regular polygon increases, so does the I.Q. The I.Q. tends towards the number 1, but it does not actually reach the limit of 1.

I am now going to look at a circle. I predict that it will have an I.Q. of 1 because it has an infinite number of sides and it’s a regular shape.

I will now look at a circle with a radius of 6.

image11.png

1.

I.Q. = 4π x Area of shape

(Perimeter of shape)²

A = πr²

A = π x6² = 113.09

Perimeter/ Circumference = πD

                                                       = 37.69

I.Q. = 4 x π x113.09 = 1.000

                  (37.69)²

A general formula for a circle

image11.png

Let the radius be A.

A== πr²

A = π xA²

C= πD

     = π2A

I.Q. = 4 x π x π A²

                  (π2A)²

I.Q. = 4 x π² A²

π 2A x π 2A

I.Q. = 4 x π² A²

             4 x π² A²

  I.Q. of any circle= 1

This has shown that a shape with an infinite number of sides i.e circle, has the highest Isoperimetric Quotient, which is 1.

I can conclude that the I.Q. of any regular polygon is constant and the more sides a regulars polygon has, the bigger the I.Q. However, irregular polygons, or shapes with different sized sides, have differing isoperimetric quotients.

I have found a general formula to work out the I.Q. for any regular polygon.

I.Q. =

From my table of results and the graphs I have shown that as the number of sides of a regular polygon increases, the I.Q. approaches 1 but never actually reaches it. However, the circle, a regular polygon with an infinite number of sides, had an I.Q. of exactly 1.

This shows that the circle with its infinite number of sides has the highest I.Q. of 1 and that the limit of a plane shape is 1.

GCSE Mathematics Coursework

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE IQ Correlation section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE IQ Correlation essays

  1. Perform a statistical enquiry that will either prove or disapprove my hypothesis.

    Therefore Mode of SAT results is Level 4 Range The range of a set of numerical data is the difference between the highest and the lowest values. Range is a simplest possible measure of spread. The range cannot be used with grouped data.

  2. Comparison of SATs results to obtain statistical data on students.

    Median= level 5 The modal level for females in English in 2000 is: Mode= 5 The modal levels for males in English in 2000 is: Mode= 5 The modal level in English in 2000 is: Mode= 5 The range of levels for females in English in 2000 is: Range= 6-2=

  1. The 3 statements I am going to investigate are: -Does the gender of the ...

    ratio fair, as there are 25 girls altogether in my investigation and 25 boys. The standard deviation for boys in year 10 was 0.761, and the standard deviation for boys in year 11 was 0.640. If I add these two I get the answer 1.401.

  2. Mathematics Statistics Coursework

    4 4 336 11 Peterson Louise Gemma 16 7 91 3 3 3 3 246 11 Dion Dawn Stella 16 1 104 4 4 5 4 324 11 Mustaq Sumreen 16 11 107 4 4 5 4 369 11 Wilson Charlene Astley 16 9 87 4 2 3 3 This

  1. GCSE Statistics Coursework

    -15 314 37 197 -14 300 51 198 -13 305 -46 199 -12 200 -151 200 -11 424 -73 200 -11 300 -51 200 -11 310 41 200 -11 303 -48 202 -9 355 -4 202 -9 450 -99 203 -8 225 -126 205 -6 300 -51 207 -4 357

  2. An Investigation into Gender-Based Stereotyping Using IQ Estimates

    the simple observable fact that sex roles, have changed and are in the process of changing as time passes. Woman who are considered to be unable to hold positions of power or careers involving intelligence are at last being allowed to serve in such capacities.

  1. Maths Coursework: investigation into the correlation between IQ and KS2 results

    4 61 9 Padd Lilly F 0 0 109 0 62 9 Mosler Samantha F 5 5 120 5 63 9 Brown Verity F 3 3 88 3 64 9 Barlow Sandra F 5 4 103 4.5 65 9 Sandy Sacha F 5 113 5 66 9 Bucket Alice F

  2. My hypotheses are: -1. People's average SAT and average GCSE results will have a ...

    To find out how large or small the difference is I have done 91 ( 33 this equals 2.75. Again I have rounded this up. This time it has been rounded to 3. This means that the person that I am going to pick is every third person.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work