• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 2679

# Mathematics Layers Coursework

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

## Mathematics Layers Coursework

Chris Grindrod  11SRH

Introduction:

In this investigation I will be investigating the amount combinations there are when there is a set sized grid with x number of squares on it, one cube can fit In to each square but there must also be one empty square. Then another layer of squares can be placed on top of the first layer of squares but the same rules apply and there must be one square that does not have another square placed on top of it. This applies to any number of layers until you are made to or required to stop. On each new layer you have to use one cube than the layer before until you have to stop or are asked to stop at a certain layer.

The rules of the investigation are as follows:

The number of cubes on the bottom layer is always one less than the number of squares on the grid unless stated otherwise.

Each new layer is made with one less cube than the layer underneath it.

Each cube must fit exactly in to a square or a cube underneath it.

## Part One

For part one of the investigation I will investigate how many different arrangements of five cubes there are on a six square grid.

Method:

I am going to draw all the combinations for the specifications above to find out how many combinations there are.

Results:

There

Middle

Now I will choose a number of layers to do, I have chosen to use a grid size of four with two layers because I have already have the number of combinations (12), which is my target answer, and in the table above I have the answers with which to check my answer.

I know that I have to devide 4!  by something because we are treating each number in 4! as a new layer, and because the 4! Is greater than 12 I know that there are too many layers involved. The only direct way to get rid of any numerator is to devide by the same number, so if I want the first two layers (4x3) I must devide by the remaining layers (2x1).

Now I shall do the same with three layers, the number of combinations for three layers on a four grid is 24, 24 is my target answer.

Now I shall do the same with one layer, the number of combinations for one layer on a four grid is 4, 4 is my target answer.

I will now put this information in to a grid.

 Grid Size (n) Layers (r) Denominator Combinations 4 1 3x2x1 or (3!) 4 4 2 2x1 or (2!) 12 4 3 1 or (1!) 24

My table shows me that, if you think of each number in the denominator column as a layer;

I.e. 3x2x1 (or 3!) is three layers because there are three numbers there.

Then the number of layers plus the number of

Conclusion

n) is mentioned in this part of the formula, it must be subtracted by the number of gaps on the bottom layer (o). So the formula now reads:

I have to multiply these two parts of the formula together because one half caters for what effect the number of gaps has on the bottom layer and the half above caters for the problem of any sized grid and any number of layers.

. So the formula for part three will be:

Or

My formula for the combinations of a four square grid with two layers of cubes and two gaps on the bottom row gives me the same answer as my results, which means that my formula for part three is correct.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences essays

1. ## Number Grids Investigation Coursework

32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110 112 114 116 118 120 122 124 126 128 130

2. ## Staircase Coursework

7 8 9 10 I use the same principle like I already did with the 3 step stair on a 10x10 grid.

1. ## Number Grid Investigation.

120 140 I now need to find a new formula connecting the width of the grid, the width of the square and also the depth of the square. Based on my original formulas: 10 (n - 1)� and 10 (n - 1)

2. ## Maths coursework. For my extension piece I decided to investigate stairs that ascend along ...

46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Stair-total (Un)

1. ## Number Grid Coursework

Where a = 64 Difference = (a + 1)(a + 10) - a(a + 11) (64 + 1)(64 + 10) - 64(64 + 11) 65 x 74 - 64 x 75 4810 - 4800 10 7) Justification The formula can be proven to work with the following algebra: Difference = (a + 1)(a + 10)

2. ## algebra coursework

= Z� + 11XZ - 11Z Z + 10(X-1) = Z + 10X - 10 (bottom left number) (Z + X-1) (Z + 10X - 10) = Z� + 10XZ - 10Z + XZ + 10X� - 10X - Z - 10X +10 = Z� + 11XZ - 11Z + 10X� - 20X + 10 (Z� + 11XZ - 11Z + 10X� - 20X + 10)

1. ## Number Grid

45 46 47 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 91 x 37 = 3367 97 x 31 = 3007 3367 - 3007 = 360 My 2nd prediction was also correct.

2. ## Maths - number grid

By investigating this 5x5 square and identifying a defined difference of 192 and by using chapter one and looking at my previous answers from this new grid I have defined the following trend: 36 60 84 12 48 108 192 To confirm that this pattern I have identified is accurate

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to