• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 1541

Maths number grid

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Number Grid Coursework

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

9 x 20 = 180

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

19 x 10 = 190

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

            d = 10

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

40

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

    89 x 100 = 8900

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

    99 x 90  = 8910

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

              d  = 10  

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

I have noticed that there is a difference of ten between the answers when multiplying the diagonally opposite corners of a 2 x 2 grid.  I have also noticed that the 2 x 2 grids I have used are the corners of the 100 square grid.  I will try using a 2 x 2 grid located more towards the centre of  the 100 square grid to see if it is  just the corner 2x2 grids that give a difference of 10.

34 x 45 = 1530

44 x 35 = 1540

         d  = 10

As you can see by my calculations it is not just a 2 x 2 grid in the corner that gives a difference of 10 when the diagonally opposite corners are multiplied. The position of the 2 x 2 grid on a 100 square grid does not change the difference.

I am now going to investigate if the difference is the same in a 2 x 3 grid when multiplying diagonally opposite corners.

2 x 3 grid

63

64

65

             63 x 75 = 4725

73

74

75

             65 x 73 = 4745

                                                   d  = 20

39

39

40

             38 x 50 = 1900

48

49

50

             48 x 40 = 1920

                                                   d  = 20

11

12

13

            11 x 23 = 253

21

22

23

            21 x 13 = 273

                                                  d  =  20

...read more.

Middle

From my results, I have discovered that if you multiply diagonally opposite corners of a 2 x 4 box grid, taken from any position in a 100 square grid, the difference between the two answers will be 30.

2 high boxes

Height

Width

Difference

2

2

10

2

3

20

2

4

30

2

5

40

As you can see in my table, I feel I could now use my findings to predict the difference for a 2 x 5 grid.  As I have already predicted, the difference will be 40.

2 x 5 grid

1

2

3

4

5

              1 x 15 = 15

11

12

13

14

15

             11 x 5  = 55

d  = 40

My prediction was correct in saying that the difference in a 2 x 5 grid would be 40.

I have noticed that it does not make any difference to the outcome wherever the grid is taken from in a 100 square grid.

From now on I only need to try one box of each size as I know that position has no effect on the difference.

2 x w Algebra (Any width)

n

 n+w

             n+w-1

n+10

n+10+w-1

             (n+10+w-1) = n+w+9

(n)  (n+w+9) = n2 + nw +9n

(n+10) (n+w-1) = n2 + nw – 1n +10n + 10w -10

(n2 +nw+9n) – (n2+nw+9n+10w-10) = d

10w-10= d

...read more.

Conclusion

n

n+w-1

g(h-1)+n

g(h-1)+n+(w-1)

gh-g+n                               gh-g+n+gw-1

n(gh-g+n+w-1)

=ngh-ng+(n2)+nw-n

(n+w-1)(gh-g+n)

=ngh-ng+(n2)+wgh-wg+wn-gh+g-n

d=(ngh-ng+(n2)+nw-n)-(ngh-ng+(n2)+wgh-wg+wn-gh+g-n)

d=wgh-wg-gh+g

I will now demonstrate how my formula works:

If g=10 h=4 w=3 n=5:

d= wgh-wg-gh+g

d=(3X10X4)-(3x10)-(10x4)+10

d=120-30-40+10

d=60

As you can see below, this is the answer I got for a 4x3 grid.

5

6

7

       5 x 37 = 185

15

16

17

       7 x 35 = 245

25

26

27

               d = 60

35

36

37

image00.png

By Philip Redpath

Algebra for h x w box on a 10x10 grid

n

n+w-1

10(h-1)+n

10(h-1)+n+(w-1)

10h-10+n                             10h-10+n+w-1

n(10h-10+n+w-1)

=10hn-10n+(n2)+wn-n

(n+w-1)(10h-10+n)

=10hn-10n+(n2)+10wh-10w+nw-10h+10-n

d=(10hn-10n+(n2)+wn-n)-( 10hn-10n+(n2)+10wh-10w+nw-10h+10-n)

d=10wh-10w-10h+10

I will now demonstrate how my formula works:

h=3     w=2     n=6

d=10wh-10w-10h+10

d=(10x2x3)-(10x2)-(10x3)+10

d=60-20-30+10

d=20

As you can see below, this is the same answer I got for a 3x2 grid:

3

4

           3 x 24 = 72

13

14

           23 x 4 = 92

23

24

                   d = 20

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Number Grid Aim: The aim of this investigation is to formulate an algebraic equation ...

    3 star(s)

    = n2 + 19n + n n + 1(n + 19) = n2 + 19n + n + 19 ? [n2 + 19n + n +19] - [n2 + 19n + n] = 19 My prediction of what the difference would be was correct.

  2. GCSE Maths Sequences Coursework

    Now I am going to try and find a formula for total number of cubes in each shape. Sequence number 1 2 3 4 5 Sequence 7 25 63 129 231 1st difference +18 +38 +66 +102 2nd difference +20 +28 +36 3rd difference +8 +8 Total Cubes I can

  1. Number Grid Coursework

    ad} a2 + zae + ad + zde - a2 - zae - ad a2 - a2 + zae - zae + ad - ad + zde zde z(p - 1)(q - 1) The formula works because the "10de" term is only produced in the expansion of the two brackets

  2. Investigation of diagonal difference.

    21 22 31 32 41 42 n n + 1 n + 4G n + 4G + 1 I theorise that every time I increase the width by one, the difference increases by 10. I predict that the 2 x 6 rectangle will have a diagonal difference of 50.

  1. Number Grids Investigation Coursework

    of w, in a rectangle with sides of m and n, let the top left corner equal a, and therefore: w ?p? m a a+p(m-1) n a+wp(n-1) a+wp(n-1)+p(n-1) Top Left = a Top Right = a + p (m - 1)

  2. Algebra Investigation - Grid Square and Cube Relationships

    This means the algebraic equation should be: Difference: (6x2x2)-(6x2)-(6x2)+6 = 6 Therefore, the formula gained has been proven to be correct and valid for calculating the difference. 7 x 7 Grid 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

  1. Number Grid Investigation.

    3 X 2 square taken from above. 16 17 18 23 24 25 7(n-1) n=3 => (3-1) = 2 7 X 2 = 14. The product difference should be 14. This is correct... (16 X 25) - (18 X 23)

  2. Maths - number grid

    this time I will be randomly selecting the rectangles from my new 12x12 number grid. I am going to start by investigating 3x2 rectangles. 8x18 - 6x20 144 - 120 Difference = 24 52x62 - 50x64 3224 - 3200 Difference = 24 I am again going to try a 2x3 rectangle to see if the outcome differs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work