• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  27. 27
    27
  28. 28
    28
  29. 29
    29
  30. 30
    30
  31. 31
    31
  32. 32
    32
  33. 33
    33
  34. 34
    34
  35. 35
    35
  36. 36
    36
  37. 37
    37
  38. 38
    38
  39. 39
    39
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 6680

Maths - number grid

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

        Maths Coursework

        Number Grids        

Chapter One

For the first part of my maths G.C.S.E coursework I have been provided with a 10x10 number grid, which is numbered 1 to 100.  I have been instructed to find the product of the top left number and the bottom right number and the same with the top right and bottom left number within selected squares used.  

I am going to use this grid to examine at random various sizes of squares and rectangles.  My objective here is to establish a trend to identify an overall formula.

I am firstly going to examine a series of 2x2 squares the primary one I will look at has been outlined in the number grid I was provided with, I will then select alternative 2x2 squares at random from the grid.

  1.                                             13x22 - 12x23image07.pngimage22.pngimage00.png

          286 - 276image03.png

          Difference = 10

                                                         58x67- 57x68

  1. image29.pngimage03.png

        3886 - 3876image03.png

          Difference = 10

  1.                                            35x44 – 34x45

           1540 - 1530image03.png

         Difference = 10

By looking at the three 2x2 squares chosen above it is possible to see each time that there is a difference of 10.  So in conclusion to this I can say that any further investigations using 2x2 squares will always result in a difference of 10.


Looking at my results and the number grid at this stage, I feel I can suggest that the reason I may get the same result of 10 each time is one of two small theories, my first one being that it is possible to see that the selected 2x2 squares have a difference of 10 between the bottom and the top line of each set of numbers, before even using multiplication.  And the second piece of theory for this difference could be that the grid I am using is a 10x10 number grid.

...read more.

Middle

I feel unable to make a prediction of a defined difference at this point; I hope to make able to predict some type of trend or pattern further on.

                        9x25 – 5x29image33.png

image03.png

                           225 –145

                       Difference = 80

image33.pngimage34.png

                        56x72 – 52x76

image03.png

                         4032 –3952image03.png

                        Difference = 80

As can be seen my defined difference for any 5x3 rectangle gives me an answer of 80.  I am going to use algebra to ensure my answer is accurate.




(s+4)(s+20) – s(s+24)

s(s+20)+4(s+20) – s  -24s

s  +20s +4s+80 – s  -24s

=80

I have now calculated the answer for my 3x2 rectangles and came to a difference of 20 and an answer for my 5x3 rectangles and came to a defined difference of 80. Still I do not see any major patterns forming and the only trend I can establish is that my answers are still multiples of 10. I will continue my investigation by increasing to a larger rectangle.

Furthering my investigation

I am now going to look at 6x4 rectangles, I would hope after this I will be able to establish some type of pattern to help me reach my aim of finding an overall formula for any rectangle that could be investigated.

image35.png

          30x55 – 25x60

            1650 –1500

image03.png

        Difference =150

        66x91 – 61x96

          6006 – 5856image03.png

       Difference = 150

By looking at the above calculations it can be assumed that they are correct, I will use algebra to prove this.

(s+5)(s+30) – s(s+35)

s(s+30) +5(s+30) – s  - 35s

s  +30s+5s+150 – s  -35s

=150

I find it very difficult to see any major trend, this is because I am randomly selecting various sizes of rectangles and therefore they do not come in any particular order and the sizes do not carry on from the one before.

Furthering my investigation

...read more.

Conclusion

r x

Result

Multiples of 9

2 x2

9

9 x 1

9 x 1

3 x3

36

9 x4

9 x 2

4 x4

81

9 x 9

9 x 3

5 x5

144

9 x 16

9 x 4

I can now draw upon the conclusion that the formula for this sequence of rhombuses  is (10-1)(r-1) .

Chapter 8

To conduct a thorough investigation I felt it was important to examine the affects that may occur if I was to reflect he shape of the rhombus within the 10x10 number grid. To ensure validity I will examine the same sizes of rhombuses that I used in my prior investigation in chapter seven, only this time all the rhombuses that I use will be this shape:-

                        13x23 – 12x24

                        299 – 288

                        Difference = 11

image15.png

                        55x75 – 53x77

                        4125 – 4081

                        Difference = 44

I will now show the algebra to this 3x3 rhombus to show that this calculation is correct.

(r+2)(r+22)-r(r+24)

r(r+22)+2(r+22)-r –24r

r +22r+2r+44-r –24r

= 44

I have distinguished that these answers are multiples of 11, therefore I will predict that the next answer will too be a multiple of 11.

                                24x54 – 21x57image16.png

                                1296 – 1197

                                Difference = 99

Again I can see that my prediction was correct.

image17.png

                                        36x76 – 32x80

                                        2736 – 2560

                                        Difference = 176

I will show the algebra for any 5x5 rhombus within a 10x10 number grid, this will show that the defined difference will always be 176.

(r+4)(r+44)-r(r+48)

r(r+44)+4(r+44)-r –48r

r +44r+4r+176-r –48r

=176

I will now place my findings from this investigation into a table to help find the end formula for any given rhombus within a 10x10 number grid.

r x

Results

Multiples of 11

2 x 2

11

11 x 1

11 x 1

 3 x 3

44

11 x 4

11 x 2

4 x 4

99

11 x 9

11 x 3

5 x 5

176

11 x 16

11 x 4

In conclusion of this chapter I can now revel that the overall formula for any                        

                      shaped rhombus is (10+1)(r-1) .

Conclusion for chapter 7 & 8

Overall this investigation into the sizes and shapes of rhombuses has provided me with evidence to suggest that the determination on the formula will depend on the actual shape of the rhombus ie.

image18.pngimage19.png

image20.pngimage20.png

Will always be a –1    whereas   Will always be a +1

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences essays

  1. GCSE Maths Sequences Coursework

    Nth term = 1.5N�+bN+c From my table I will solve the Nth term using simultaneous equations, I will use stages 2&3 to solve the Nth term for the unshaded squares. 1) 6+2b+c=4 2) 13.5+3b+c=10 2-1 is 7.5+b=6 b=-1.5 To find c: 6-3+c=4 c=1 Nth term for Unshaded = 1.5N�-1.5N+1

  2. Number Grid Investigation.

    The general formula works if you know the term in the sequence, which gives you the square size. What if the square selection size is not known? An overall formula is needed linking the square selection sizes and grid sizes.

  1. Number Grid Coursework

    Data Analysis From the tables (a)-(e), it is possible to see that with a 2x2 box, the difference of the two products always equals z: the width of the grid. When plotted on a graph (Fig 2.6), the relationship is clearly visible as a perfect positive correlation.

  2. How many squares in a chessboard n x n

    It's mathematical form is 52 + 16 + 9 + 4 + 1 or (n - 3)(n - 3) + 16 +9 + 4 + 1 = 25 +16 + 9 + 4 +1, which gives the total number of squares in this particular square.

  1. Number Grids Investigation Coursework

    - (top left x bottom right) = (a + 1) (a + 9) - a (a + 10) = a2 + a + 9a + 9 - a2 - 10a = a2 + 10a + 9 - a2 - 10a = (a2 - a2)

  2. "Multiply the figures in opposite corners of the square and find the difference between ...

    is the second difference which is regular; the equation must include n squared. This sustains my prediction from the graph that the formula to work out the difference must include n squared as it has the distinct shape to it.

  1. Number Grid Investigation

    2 x 2 Squares 34 35 44 45 12 13 22 23 3 x 3 Squares 15 16 17 25 26 27 35 36 37 78 79 80 88 89 90 98 99 100 4 x 4 Squares 16 17 18 19 26 27 28 29 36 37 38 49

  2. Number Grid Investigation.

    Vary the shape of box We have already worked out the Product difference of a 2 X 2 square within a 10 wide grid. This was always 10, I have used algebra to prove the 'always'. I am now going to see what happens when I change the box size to a 3 X 3 square.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work