• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 3495

Maths Statistics Coursework

Extracts from this document...


Guesstimate                                                 Joel Morrison

Maths Statistics Coursework



The title of my investigation is ‘Guesstimate’, as I will be looking at how accurate different people are at estimating. The aim of the investigation is to deduce estimating skills of pupils of different ages, abilities and genders. To do this I have created the following hypotheses:

1) The older you are, the better you are at estimating.

  1. The higher the band you are in, the better you are at estimating.
  2. Boys are better than estimating than girls.

In order to do this I will need to collect information for Key Stage 3, Key Stage 4 and Key Stage 5, and within the stages ability (band) and gender. I will collect this information from a database, which gives us: Key Stage, maths ability (higher, middle or lower band), gender and their estimates of an acute (17°), obtuse (147°) and reflex (302°) angle.

However, I will only be using the information for the obtuse angle, because the acute would be extremely small so people may guess zero, which would affect our results. Also, reflex angles could be mistaken for acute angles and vice versa, so people may not be giving an accurate estimate.

I will assume that the data is reliable, as I will eliminate bias from my sample by looking at the errors in guessing. To calculate percentage error I will use:

This will make it easier to see how far out the pupils were from guessing the correct angle, making it much easier to compare results. This means that 0% error will be a perfect estimate, so the higher the percentage error the worse the estimate.

I will use a stratified sample to

...read more.


This means that in fact Key Stage 5’s values are closely bunched (due to standard deviation) around a value that is further away from zero % error and therefore less accurate than Key Stage 4. Although Key Stage 4’s data is less consistent, it is less consistent around a value very close to zero, suggesting many pupils in Key Stage 4 guessed very accurately, on a contrary to my hypothesis.

The median and the skew of the box plots also seem to suggest this. Again Key Stage 4’s median is the closest to zero (-1.36), Key Stage 5’s median is further from zero (-4.76) and Key Stage 3 is further still (-6.16). This means on average Key Stage 4 were much more accurate than Key Stage 5, and the skew only emphasizes this point. We can see that in Key Stage 4’s box plot, there is a positive skew as the median (-1.36) is closer to the upper quartile (2.04). This means that the majority of the estimates were between -1.36% and 2.04% error with fewer below -1.36, giving incredibly accurate estimates. Whereas in Key Stage 5’s box plot, there is a negative skew as the median (-4.76) is closer to the lower quartile (-6.16). This means most of the estimates are between -4.76 and -6.16 and fewer above -4.76, extremely far off zero compared with Key Stage 4, and therefore the estimates are much less accurate. Of course, Key Stage 3 complied with the hypothesis, with a negative skew even more than Key Stage 5, with both the median and upper quartiles being -6.16.

Overall, my results do not comply with my hypothesis entirely. Key Stage 3 were by far the least accurate at estimating, which does conform to the hypothesis as they are the youngest.

...read more.



In conclusion, it is obvious that there is no concrete evidence that we can take away from this analysis, other than males are perhaps slightly better at estimating than females. We have seen no clear relationship between age and accuracy of estimation, nor between the seemingly most obvious relationship between maths ability and accuracy of estimation. It seems likely that, estimating an angle is exactly that – estimating. It has nothing to do with maths ability or age, but apparently gender does have some effect. It is just educated guesses that, according to this data, males are slightly better at.

However, there were still many things that would have improved the investigation were we to repeat it. For example, the sample size for much of the data may have been too small, so wouldn’t have allowed us to see a trend in the data. Increasing the sample size would give a much better representation of the population. As Key Stage 5 had a much smaller sample size and are all only in upper band ability making it hard to compare them, so this makes me question whether we should have included them into our investigation at all. They chose to do maths and perhaps it is unfair that none of the other students have actually chosen to do maths. We could also have looked at year groups instead of Key Stage, as it would probably be easier to spot a trend if there were more categories to work from. Doing this would allow us to draw many more box plots to investigate in much further detail.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Miscellaneous section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Miscellaneous essays

  1. For our GCSE statistics coursework, we were given the question Where are houses most ...

    A systematic sample works like this: Say if the population size was 200 (this is an example) and you needed a sample size of 50 you would divide 200/50=4. So therefore you would start with a random number and use every fourth number in that sample.

  2. Statistics coursework

    I chose 60 because it is an even number and a factor of 240; it is also a fairly large sample and would evenly represent the drivers in the data. Bias is a statistical sampling error caused by systematically favouring some outcomes over others.

  1. Maths T-totals coursework

    28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 T-number=2 T-total=2+11+19+20+21=73 (the reverse of 37 is 73) I will now try and find a formula.

  2. Maths Coursework

    I discovered, by finding out about other bands, that in 2006 high street CD sales slumped by 20%. I believe this is because of Internet downloads as they can be obtained cheaper or even free. On the other hand, the album One Hot Minute experienced a fall in sales, but

  1. GCSE STATISTICS/Data Handling Coursework 2008

    2.37 2.37 2.44 2.57 2.7 2.83 2.9 2.96 21: 0.13 0.46 0.79 0.88 1.15 1.16 1.16 1.53 1.59 1.86 2.04 2.15 2.23 2.42 24: 0.03 0.62 1.04 1.83 1.88 2.09 27: 0.47 0.78 I made another dot plot and box and whisker diagram repeated this, using Bleep test scores.

  2. Data handling - calculating means and standard deviations

    -429 -429 -408 -396 -498 -390 -453 -435 -534 -393 -513 -480 -420 -537 -498 -435 -426 -531 -528 -396 -405 -492 -537 -483 -435 -402 -537 -417 -447 -405 -426 -516 -444 -477 -480 -411 -390 -390 -492 * The mean ()

  1. Statistics Coursework. I am going to study the wealth of countries in the ...

    14.5 11 12.25 Latvia 68.3 11,931 14.5 17 6.25 Libya 38.7 9,476 48 19 841 Mali 55.5 556 31 44 169 Mauritania 55.0 847 33 39 36 Mozambique 56.6 363 27 49 484 Netherlands 76.8 46,041 8 4 16 New Zealand 80.2 30,599 2 13 121 Nicaragua 60.0 1,013 22

  2. Statistical Experiment Plan to investigate the ability to estimate 30 and 60 seconds.

    My sample size shall be 50 people. I chose 50 because it is big enough to fairly represent the population but not too big that it is too time consuming to draw diagrams with. To do a stratified sample I will split my population into two, one side for males and one side for females and numerically label them in ascending order.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work