• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 8213

Maths Statistics Coursework - relationship between the weight and height

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Matthew Eden

Planning

Introduction:

In this investigation, I am aiming to find out information on the relationship between the weight and height and the relationship between the age and height.

Hypotheses:

  • As the height increases, the weight increases
  • As the age increases, the height increases
  • Boys have a higher average height than girls

Justification:

I think that as someone’s height increases, their weight increases. I predict this because of basic knowledge of the human body. As someone’s body grows, it the muscles, bones and fat on the body increases and gets larger. And as these increase, they make the body weigh more. I will present this data in scatter graphs for boys, girls and both. I will use Microsoft Excel to create this graph because I think that it will prevent human error and it will enable me to change the scales or any other amendments at any time with ease. This will help me compare and contrast the different genders’ heights and weights. To give me knowledge of the correct correlation, I will use product-moment correlation coefficient which is a calculation that shows the correlation value of the data. For all the scatter graphs, I will construct them by using Microsoft Excel which will allow me to group the data to present them into scatter graphs.

I predict that as the student gets older, their height also increases for all boys and girls. This is probably because as you get older, you grow which also increases your height. I will simply plot this data in a scatter graph showing the ages and heights, hopefully providing me some correlation which I can interpret.

Also, I think that all boys will be taller than all the girls in all the year groups in the school.

...read more.

Middle

0.5202

1.60

49

-0.01

-0.8

0.000081

0.64

0.0072

1.55

45

-0.06

-4.8

0.003481

23.04

0.2832

1.53

52

-0.08

2.2

0.006241

4.84

-0.1738

1.49

52

-0.12

2.2

0.014161

4.84

-0.2618

1.66

45

0.05

-4.8

0.002601

23.04

-0.2448

1.71

35

0.10

-14.8

0.010201

219.04

-1.4948

1.59

52

-0.02

2.2

0.000361

4.84

-0.0418

1.40

41

-0.21

-8.8

0.043681

77.44

1.8392

1.65

45

0.04

-4.8

0.001681

23.04

-0.1968

1.80

48

0.19

-1.8

0.036481

3.24

-0.3438

1.60

40

-0.01

-9.8

0.000081

96.04

0.0882

1.80

42

0.19

-7.8

0.036481

60.84

-1.4898

1.67

48

0.06

-1.8

0.003721

3.24

-0.1098

1.65

54

0.04

4.2

0.001681

17.64

0.1722

1.58

45

-0.03

-4.8

0.000841

23.04

0.1392

1.65

45

0.04

-4.8

0.001681

23.04

-0.1968

1.52

47

-0.09

-2.8

0.007921

7.84

0.2492

1.60

9

-0.01

-40.8

0.000081

1664.64

0.3672

1.85

62

0.24

12.2

0.058081

148.84

2.9402

1.65

55

0.04

5.2

0.001681

27.04

0.2132

1.50

50

-0.11

0.2

0.011881

0.04

-0.0218

1.65

54

0.04

4.2

0.001681

17.64

0.1722

1.69

42

0.08

-7.8

0.006561

60.84

-0.6318

1.70

54

0.09

4.2

0.008281

17.64

0.3822

1.67

48

0.06

-1.8

0.003721

3.24

-0.1098

1.91

82

0.30

32.2

0.090601

1036.84

9.6922

1.62

63

0.01

13.2

0.000121

174.24

0.1452

2.06

84

0.45

34.2

0.203401

1169.64

15.4242

1.63

59

0.02

9.2

0.000441

84.64

0.1932

Average = 1.61

Average = 49.8

0.962850

9550.00

46.8

Result for Correlation = 0.488050598

With this result for the correlation for all the boys and girls in the sample, I have gathered that there is a relatively positive correlation because it is about the middle between 0 and 1 which is neither a no correlation nor a very strong correlation. I have to consider that there are a couple anomalies which could have possibly distorted the means which could in turn alter the PMCC for the whole of the high school.

This graph and calculations have aided me to conclude on my hypothesis including ‘as the height increases, the weight increases.’ This is a basic hypothesis which can be proved by using this scatter graph which clearly illustrates the relationship between the two variables.

This is a scatter graph displaying the heights and weights for all the boys.

image07.png There is a definite correlation for these variables; however, there are a few anomalies which are probably mistakes which happened when entering the data. Since product-moment correlation coefficient allows me to view how much this set of data is positive or negative, I will use this to see how positive the relationship is between the variables.

All Boys

Height (m) (x)

Weight (kg) (y)

x- image05.png

y-image06.png

(x-image05.png)^2

(y-image06.png)^2

(x-image05.png)(y-image06.png

1.47

50

-0.16

0.8

0.026244

0.64

-0.1296

1.52

32

-0.11

-17.2

0.012544

295.84

1.9264

1.65

52

0.02

2.8

0.000324

7.84

0.0504

1.53

40

-0.10

-9.2

0.010404

84.64

0.9384

1.57

48

-0.06

-1.2

0.003844

1.44

0.0744

1.55

38

-0.08

-11.2

0.006724

125.44

0.9184

1.72

51

0.09

1.8

0.007744

3.24

0.1584

1.66

43

0.03

-6.2

0.000784

38.44

-0.1736

1.32

47

-0.31

-2.2

0.097344

4.84

0.6864

1.32

48

-0.31

-1.2

0.097344

1.44

0.3744

1.60

49

-0.03

-0.2

0.001024

0.04

0.0064

1.55

45

-0.08

-4.2

0.006724

17.64

0.3444

1.65

45

0.02

-4.2

0.000324

17.64

-0.0756

1.80

48

0.17

-1.2

0.028224

1.44

-0.2016

1.60

40

-0.03

-9.2

0.001024

84.64

0.2944

1.80

42

0.17

-7.2

0.028224

51.84

-1.2096

1.67

48

0.04

-1.2

0.001444

1.44

-0.0456

1.60

9

-0.03

-40.2

0.001024

1616.04

1.2864

1.85

62

0.22

12.8

0.047524

163.84

2.7904

1.65

55

0.02

5.8

0.000324

33.64

0.1044

1.50

50

-0.13

0.8

0.017424

0.64

-0.1056

1.91

82

0.28

32.8

0.077284

1075.84

9.1184

1.62

63

-0.01

13.8

0.000144

190.44

-0.1656

2.06

84

0.43

34.8

0.183184

1211.04

14.8944

1.63

59

0.00

9.8

0.000004

96.04

-0.0196

Average = 1.63

Average = 49.2

0.657200

5126

31.84

Result for Correlation = 0.548573697

There is a relatively strong positive correlation for all the boys.

...read more.

Conclusion

Problems and Limitations

One problem involving the statistical calculations was that I calculated the upper, lower, median and inter-quartile range because I simply forgot that I have to work out 25th, 50th and 75th percentile of the values, so therefore, I went back to those calculations and fixed them. This led to me constructing another box and whisker plot for these averages because they were wrong.

One main limitation is that I could have sampled from a large population. Instead of sampling from 50 students, I think that if I had more time to do this investigation, I would suggest to myself to sample from the entire school or collect a census report to fully reflect a large population. This would allow me to justify the data more accurately and produce better relationships to prove my hypotheses.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Mayfield School Mathematics Statistics Coursework

    We call this calculated line the least squares regression line. I will now calculate such a line for the males and then for the females, and compare these lines to the line, y = x. If the students were of a truly equal ability in Maths and Science, then the

  2. Determine the relationship between the range of the jump achieved by the ski jumper ...

    0.280 0.687 0.580 Angle 15� Comment on results: As you can see, the results of my experiment were entered in the above tables. These tables consist of: 1. Height up the ramp. 2. Range. 3. Velocity. 4. Time of flight.

  1. Mayfield High Statistics Coursework

    Year 7 boys = 151/1183 x 25 = 3 Year 7 girls = 131/1183 x 25 = 3 Year 8 boys = 145/1183 x 25 = 3 Year 8 girls = 125/1183 x 25 = 2 Year 9 boys = 118/1183 x 25 = 2 Year 9 girls = 143/1183

  2. Edexcel GCSE Statistics Coursework

    The first point on the male scatter graph shows us someone who is 1.24M tall weighing in at 43KG. It can be assumed that both these students are in KS3, (years 7-9), due to them being lighter and shorter than most others on the graph.

  1. Maths Statistics Coursework

    hypothesis is correct if this happens I will investigate the hypothesis further. The data I am using is continuous this will make the results more varied. The more varied the results are the more options I have in how I will study the data.

  2. Investigation on the shape and size of limpets on a sheltered rocky shore called ...

    Seeing that the problem experienced lower down the shore where the limpets have to have a small ratio so they are more stream line and more resistant to the strong wave action which can dislodge the limpets and wash them away isn't a major problem higher up the sea shore.

  1. Statistics GCSE Coursework. Height and weight of pupils. The sampling method I am ...

    1.51 85 38 93.5 -8.5 72.25 1.51 85 45 74.5 10.5 110.25 1.51 85 59 20 65 4225 1.51 85 48 63 22 484 1.51 85 40 88.5 -3.5 12.25 1.50 89.5 52 44 45.5 2070.25 1.50 89.5 49 57.5 32 1024 1.50 89.5 39 92 -2.5 6.25 1.50 89.5

  2. I am going to find out the year 10 male average student at Weavers ...

    After dealing with the outliers the range of 2009 data is less than the 1996 data which means that 2009 data is more reliable than 1996 data. I have redrawn box and whisker after finding the outliers to get a more accurate view of the spread and consistency of the data after discounting the outliers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work