• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 2121

Mayfeild High School Statistic Coursework: height and weight

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mayfeild High School Statistic Coursework

This coursework will handle a mass amount of data, and accompanying it with graphs and tables to simplify this. The data will be shown in different ways, and will span most of this document. I will choose a random amount of subjects which is 30 random students. Then when extending this investigation, I will choose 30 random students of the each gender which boys and girls, with this information I will make hypothesis’s and make many graphs to represent this.

Below is the start of my investigation, I have chosen as you can see 30 students and I will extend this as the investigation carries on.

The 30 Random Students Sample:

Number

Gender

Height

Weight

1

M

1.65

41

2

M

1.49

67

3

F

1.48

34

4

F

1.62

50

5

M

1.73

47

6

F

1.80

110

7

M

1.50

55

8

F

1.46

45

9

M

1.75

65

10

M

1.53

48

11

F

1.61

47

12

F

1.55

42

13

F

1.60

53

14

F

1.72

65

15

M

1.20

36

16

M

1.82

70

17

M

1.68

45

18

M

1.65

40

19

F

1.60

40

20

F

1.50

45

21

F

1.80

62

22

F

1.40

41

23

M

1.60

70

24

F

1.56

54

25

F

1.02

55

26

M

1.80

66

27

F

1.60

48

28

M

1.67

48

29

F

1.62

45

30

M

1.71

60

Height Tally

Weight

Height (M)

Tally

Freq

Weight

Tally

Freq

1.00>1.10

||

2

30>40

||

2

1.10>1.20

40>50

|||||||| ||||

14

1.20>1.30

|

1

50>60

||||

5

1.30>1.40

60>70

|||| |

6

1.40>1.50

||||

4

70>80

||

2

1.50>1.60

||||

5

80>90

1.60>1.70

|||||||| |

11

90>100

1.70>1.80

||||

4

100>110

|

1

1.80>1.90

|||

3

Here is a tally chart to represent my data in an easy to read form.

...read more.

Middle

There are few people in the sample I choose that is taller then 1.90>2.00 indicated that there is a height span and restriction.The modal class interval is 1.60>1.70 which could be likely for both girls and boys.

Extending the investigation

Now I am ready to extend this investigation, to do so I will make a hypothesis to test.  This hypothesis can be true or false, and it is my investigation that will test it. My hypothesis for this investigation is: In general, the taller the person’s height is, the more they would weight. This hypothesis is made by looking at height and weight of the sample I will gather.

To do prove this, I will have to gather a new sample, I have done that below:

Random Boys

Random Girls

Number

Height

Weight

Number

Height

Weight

1

1.2

36

29

1.25

33

2

1.41

31

27

1.41

39

3

1.47

47

14

1.47

45

4

1.48

40

30

1.49

47

5

1.5

39

8

1.50

38

6

1.52

38

10

1.50

45

7

1.52

50

15

1.51

36

8

1.53

44

23

1.51

50

9

1.55

47

1

1.52

38

10

1.55

50

22

1.52

58

11

1.55

66

24

1.54

40

12

1.56

56

2

1.55

50

13

1.58

51

19

1.56

45

14

1.6

38

11

1.57

52

15

1.6

43

26

1.57

52

16

1.62

40

3

1.59

52

17

1.62

87

5

1.62

42

18

1.63

55

9

1.62

48

19

1.65

44

18

1.62

80

20

1.65

46

7

1.65

49

21

1.65

64

25

1.65

54

22

1.67

53

4

1.68

52

23

1.7

57

6

1.71

42

24

1.71

44

13

1.73

50

25

1.71

46

20

1.73

58

26

1.72

54

21

1.75

56

27

1.73

50

28

1.79

43

28

1.77

57

12

1.80

60

29

1.82

57

16

1.80

60

30

1.9

70

17

1.90

40

This is a sample of 30 boys and 30 girls, I have taken these at random by the process of a “lucky dip” way.

...read more.

Conclusion

  • The points on my scatter diagram for boys are less dispersed then to say the girls are, the boys are concentrated whereas the girl isn’t. This suggests that the correlation is better for boys then for the girls and boy’s height and weight is more predictable compared to the girls.
  • When looking at the mixed scatter diagram, the points that are less dispersed then to the singular points, this suggests that when combined they form a better picture compared to separate scatter diagrams. This suggests that the correlation between height and weight is equal and is predictable, and would make a better picture when mixed together.
  • The points on the mixed scatter diagram of boys and girls has a slight curve, suggesting that the points are not linear, but the range is predictable and isn’t a wild curve.
  • My scatter diagrams I compiled can be used to give reasonable estimates of height and weight; you can get this information by just reading off the scatter points, or looking at the line of best fit on the graph.
  • Cumulative curves show that girls peak earlier then boys, whereas boys peak the curve nearing the end of the curve. This suggests that boys are naturally taller then girls because of the shape of the curve of the boys and girls when comparing them.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. mayfield high statistics coursework

    there is a Correlation or a Trend between both variables which are Height and Weight and there is a Fairly Strong Positive Correlation and this shows me that the taller the person the higher the weight although there are always some irregularities which is unique as a symmetrical trend is rather impossible as every human being has various growth period.

  2. Maths Statistics Coursework - relationship between the weight and height

    1.7 0,1 1.8 0 Key: for example: 1.3 | 0 = 1.30 metres Here are the calculations for the girls' heights. Mean = 1.59 m Mode = 1.6 & 1.5 m Median = 1.595 = 1.60 m Range = 0.49 m Upper Quartile = 1.6575 = 1.66 m Lower Quartile

  1. height and weight investigation

    Firstly I will calculate what a 1.65 m tall male will weigh, the values of m and c are 51.48 and -32.21, therefore the equation is y=51.48�1.65+(-32.21). y = 51.48�1.65+(-32.21) y = 84.95+(-32.21) y = 52.74 Therefore I predict that a 1.65 meters tall male will weigh 52.47 kg.

  2. Conduct an investigation comparing height and weight from pupils in Mayfield School.

    But this may be due to pure chance. I may get different results with a larger or different sample of children. Now for the standard deviation for weight, for boys and girls. After taking everything into consideration I have decided than I cannot actually make an accurate hypothesis for weight.

  1. The effect of drop jump height on spinal shrinkage.

    Figure 3 shows the effect of which block height incurred upon the subjects stature change (mm). A one-way analysis of variance revealed a significant main effect for block height on stature change (SC), reporting; F 1, 9 = 5.6, P < 0.05, therefore indicating that stature change was significantly greater

  2. Mayfield High Coursework

    The highest height sampled is 1.80cm. 1.80 - 1.19 = 61 Therefore, the range is 61cm Frequency graph and box plots for height After investigation: Looking at the height CF line graph alone, girls tend to be a little taller than boys.

  1. Statistics Coursework

    * The lower and upper quartiles of the female data are closer to the median than their respective male counterparts. We can interpret from this that the data for the females is more consistent than that of the males - increasing the reliability.

  2. mayfield high school handling data coursework

    44 0.213189 7 Butler Leanne Female 1.65 40 0.476838 7 Dugan Maggie Female 1.49 53 0.28154 7 McMan Kelly Sue Female 1.43 38 0.079753 7 Hall Sarah Female 1.58 45 0.91427 7 Cook Melissa Female 1.62 49 0.906924 7 Knight Jane Female 1.57 45 0.334458 7 Biddle Vicky Joanne Female

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work