• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
13. 13
13
14. 14
14
15. 15
15
16. 16
16
17. 17
17
18. 18
18
19. 19
19
20. 20
20
21. 21
21
22. 22
22
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 5177

# mayfield course work -boys are generally heavier than girl. This has to do with their body structure. Therefore I predict that my results will produce a pattern which shows that boys weight more than girls.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chioma Akunna                Mathematics Coursework: Statistics

11 Beatrice

Introduction

In this coursework I will be looking at various lines of enquiry based on data collected from Mayfield High School. Therefore I will be doing an investigation into the relationship between height, weight, body mass index and age of boys and girls at this school.

People’s height and weight are affected by their age and gender.

I assume that in year 7-9, more girls would be taller than boys. This is because girls tend to grow faster than boys at the early stages of development but boys eventually grow taller than them. Therefore in year 10-11, more boys would be taller than girls. This also applies to the adults aged 20 and above.

As for the weight, boys are generally heavier than girl. This has to do with their body structure. Therefore I predict that my results will produce a pattern which shows that boys weight more than girls. This pattern will be produced for all age groups: 7-9, 10-11 and 20+. The scatter diagram will have no correlation between age and BMI. This is because the data being used is non-continuous as age group 17-19 has been skipped in this investigation.

The histogram for year group 7-11 will show that most of the students will be underweight but more girls would be overweight than boys. As for the adults aged 20 and above, most of them will be overweight.

Method

There are 1183 students in Mayfield but I need to sample only 60 students. The population has been divided into strata according to their year group and gender too.

Middle

0

Male

1.82

80

24.2

10

39

7

Male

1.83

90

26.9

11

39

3

Male

1.75

81

26.4

14

27

10

Male

1.78

70

22.1

18

27

7

Male

1.78

65

20.5

19

41

2

Male

1.74

89

29.4

PIE CHART:  The pie charts will be used to show the relationship between height and age group. The result will then compared between boys and girls of the different age groups.

11 – 14 years:                              Male                                                 Female

 Height Interval (m) Tally Frequency Angle Tally Frequency Angle 1.4 – 1.49 || 2 34 |||| | 6 108 1.5 – 1.59 |||| 4 69 |||| 5 90 1.6 – 1.69 |||||||| || 12 206 |||| || 7 126 1.7 – 1.79 ||| 3 51 | 1 18 1.8 – 1.89 | 1 18

15 – 16 years:                      Male                                                   Female

 Height Interval (m) Tally Frequency Angle Tally Frequency Angle 1.5 – 1.59 || 2 80 || 2 72 1.6 – 1.69 ||| 3 120 |||| 5 180 1.7 – 1.79 || 2 80 || 2 72 1.8 – 1.89 | 1 40 | 1 36 1.9 – 1.99 | 1 40 36

20+                             Male                                                          Female

 Height Interval (m) Tally Frequency Angle Tally Frequency Angle 1.50 – 1.54 | 1 36 1.55 – 1.59 | 1 36 1.60 – 1.64 || 2 72 1.65 – 1.69 |||| 4 144 1.70 – 1.74 | 1 36 1.75 – 1.79 |||| 5 180 || 2 72 1.8 – 1.84 ||| 3 108 1.85 – 1.89 | 1 36

With reference to table 1, the median group and estimated mean in the sample were higher for boys than for girls. However the sample for girls in year group 7-9 were more spread out with a range of 0.49m compared to 0.39m for the boys. This must have affected the mean. The evidence from the sample suggests that in year group 7-9, 12 boys out of 41 pupils, have a height between 1.6m and 1.69m whilst 7 girls out of the same 41 pupils have a height of 1.6m and 1.69m. This prove that the first part of my hypothesis is wrong: i predicted that in year 7-9, more girls would be taller than boys but my result shows more boys to be taller than girls.
However in year group 10-11, there were more girls than boys with a height between 1.6m and 1.69m though the samples for boys were more spread out with a range of 0.49m compared to 0.39 for the girls. Once again my hypothesis is wrong because i predicted that in year 10-11, boys would be taller than girl.
These conclusions are based on a sample of only 60 pupils. Therefore the limitation of data could have affected the accuracy of my hypothesis. If I could extend the sample my hypothesis is likely to be right.

MEASURES OF AVERAGES

Heights

Year group 7 - 9:                     Male                                                         Female

 Height Interval (m) Frequencyf Midpointx fx Frequencyf Midpointx fx 1.4 – 1.49 2 1.445 2.89 6 1.445 8.69 1.5 – 1.59 4 1.545 6.18 5 1.545 7.725 1.6 – 1.69 12 1.645 19.74 7 1.645 11.515 1.7 – 1.79 3 1.745 1.745 1 1.745 1.745 1.8 – 1.89 1 1.845 1.845 ∑f = 21 ∑fx = 34.045 ∑f = 20 ∑fx = 31.52

Estimated mean = 34.045                                                   = 31.52

21                                                      20

= 1.62                                                                 = 1.57

Year group 10 - 11                  Male        Female

 Height Interval (m) Frequencyf Midpointx fx Frequencyf Midpointx fx 1.5 – 1.59 2 1.545 3.09 2 1.545 3.09 1.6 – 1.69 3 1.645 4.935 5 1.645 8.225 1.7 – 1.79 2 1.745 3.49 2 1.745 3.49 1.8 – 1.89 1 1.845 1.845 1 1.845 1.845 1.9 – 1.99 1 1.945 1.945 ∑f = 9 ∑fx = 15.305 ∑f = 10 ∑fx = 16.65

Estimated mean = 15.305        = 16.65

9              10

= 1.70                                                               = 1.67

20+                                     Male        Female

 Height Interval (m) Frequencyf Midpointx fx Frequencyf Midpointx fx 1.54 – 1.54 1 1.52 1.52 1.55 – 1.59 1 1.57 1.57 1.6 – 1.64 2 1.62 3.24 1.65 – 1.69 4 1.67 6.68 1.7 – 1.74 0 1.72 0 1 1.72 1.72 1.75 – 1.79 2 1.77 3.54 5 1.77 8.85 1.8 – 1.84 3 1.82 5.46 1.85 – 1.89 1 1.87 1.87 ∑f = 10 ∑fx = 16.55 ∑f = 10 ∑fx = 17.452

Estimated mean = 16.55        = 17.452

10                    10

= 1.66        = 1.75

Table 1

Measures of average: heights (metres)

 Estimated Mean Median Group Modal Group Range Year group 7-9malefemale 1.62 1.6 – 1.69 1.6 – 1.69 0.39 1.57 1.5 – 1.59 1.6 – 1.69 0.49 Year group 10-11malefemale 1.70 1.6 – 1.69 1.6 – 1.69 0.49 1.67 1.6 – 1.69 1.6 – 1.69 0.39 20+malefemale 1.66 1.65 – 1.69 1.65 – 1.69 0.29 1.75 1.75 – 1.79 1.75 – 1.79 0.19

CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY: the cumulative frequency graph will be used to compare the boys and girls weight in each age group. I will be commenting on the inter-quartile range and median and making reference to the box plot.

Year group 7-9                         Male                                              Female

 Weight Interval (kg) Tally Frequency Cumulative Frequency Tally Frequency Cumulative Frequency 30 – 39 | 1 1 | 1 1 40 – 49 |||||||||| 12 13 |||||||| | 11 12 50 – 59 ||||| 6 19 |||| | 6 18 60 – 69 | 1 20 || 2 20 70 – 79 0 20 80 - 89 | 1 21

Year group 10 - 11:                        Male                                                 Female

 Weight Interval (kg) Tally Frequency Cumulative Frequency Tally Frequency Cumulative Frequency 30 – 39 | 1 1 40 – 49 || 2 2 ||| 3 4 50 – 59 ||| 3 5 |||| 5 9 60 – 69 ||| 3 8 | 1 10 70 – 79 0 8 80 –  89 | 1 9

20+                                 Male                                                    Female

 Weight Interval (kg) Tally Frequency Cumulative Frequency Tally Frequency Cumulative Frequency 40 – 49 | 1 1 50 – 59 ||| 3 4 60 – 69 | 1 1 ||| 3 7 70 – 79 ||| 3 4 7 80 – 89 |||| 5 9 || 2 9 90 –  99 | 1 10 | 1 10

Conclusion

• All three measures of average are higher for boys than for girls. In year group 7-9 the median and mode as a measure of average was similar. However, the data shows that boys weight more than girls in the same age group. Table 3 shows the estimated mean for boys in year group 10-11 to be 58.9kg and 50.5kg for girls in the same year group. The box plot shows that the girls’ inter-quartile range is 4.6kg less than the boys’. This suggests that the boys’ weights are more spread out than the girls. As for the adults all three measures of average are greater for the men than for the women. The adult data supports my hypothesis and proves that it is right.
• There is no correlation between body mass index and age both for the adult data and the sample. This is as a result of non-continuous data as age group 17-19 was skipped. This proves my hypothesis right.
• Histogram shows more than half of the sample (61%) to be underweight. This proves prediction right.
• Standard deviation for adult shows that male data is closer to mean than female data. With a standard deviation of 2.54, we can conclude that BMI values of male are close to the mean (24.89). On the other hand, female values are more spread out with a mean of 24.39 and a deviation of 4.71. This could be as a result of limited data.

Further sampling of data could make all my hypothesis correct. Therefore I could improve on the result obtained by extending the sample. It would give a wider range of data which could change the result obtained.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

1. ## For my project I am investigate the relationship between weight, height and body mass ...

Conrad Male 1.49 47 21.2 2 0.00695607 7 Boyoh Jake Male 1.54 43 18.1 3 0.018260925 7 Morrison Anthony John Male 1.68 40 14.2 4 0.035408359 7 Whale Steven Stewart Male 1.5 59 26.2 5 0.040128911 7 Andrews John Male 1.41 45 22.6 6 0.042855668 7 Lillie Ben Male 1.54

2. ## Conduct an investigation comparing height and weight from pupils in Mayfield School.

Girls Gradient = 0.8 Intercept = 140 y = mx + c y = 0.8x + 140 x = y - 140 0.8 So if a girl is 164cm tall the equation of the line would suggest If y = 164cm then X = 164 - 140 = 24 = 30 (30 + 30 = 60)

1. ## Maths Statistics Coursework - relationship between the weight and height

To make up that correlation with a more accurate calculation, I used PMCC which exactly told me that there was a relatively strong positive correlation which was about half between 0 and 1 (1 being perfect positive and 0 being no correlation).

2. ## Maths data handling &amp;quot;girls are more intelligent than boys&amp;quot;.

Also, in this case, these calculations disagree with my hypothesis: girls are more intelligent than boys, as these results indicate than the average IQ for boys and girls is exactly the same. Then again, these results are only estimates because you can only estimate the average (mean)

1. ## Boys are taller than girls, I am going to investigate this by looking at ...

Female 1.71 35 Yr 10 boys 10 Slone Mark 15 9 October Male 1.58 60 10 Leech Alistair 15 10 September Male 1.65 55 10 Larry Liam 15 5 February Male 1.65 47 10 Saj Shida 15 3 April Male 1.65 68 10 Jones Paul 15 5 February Male 1.68

2. ## Does Foot Size Increase With Height and Do Boys Have Larger Feet than Girls?

Also, the majority of male results are densely situated towards the higher values on the y-axis while the majority of female results although sparsely spread are situated around the middle y-axis. This justifies my hypothesis as I said earlier in my investigation that male shoe size tends to be larger than female shoe size.

1. ## Statistics GCSE Coursework. Height and weight of pupils. The sampling method I am ...

For a normal distribution the mean mode and median are the same. To see if my data fit this distribution I compared the obtained results for year 11 males and females separately with what I would expect for normally distributed data.

2. ## During this coursework unit I will be using statistical knowledge to analyse my data ...

From it I can see the highest and lowest value quite easily and see how much the data varies. Male adult illiteracy rate in 1990- Mean= 3001/125= 24.008% Range= 82-0.5= 81.5% Standard Deviation= 123935-242 = 20.38% 125 Stem and Leaf Diagram- 0 000000111111122222234455566666778899 1 000000111233333333444578889 2 00222233347889 3 01111233444555667889 4

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to