• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 3821

Mayfield igh Investigation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mayfield High Handling Data Coursework Hypothesis I believe that the taller the person, the more they will weigh. This will be more visible in year 11, due to the rate of puberty. Also, boys in year 11 will mostly be taller than the girls, however in year 7 the heights will be more even or girls may even be taller due to their rate of puberty is at a lower age than boys. There should be a positive correlation between the weight and height of the pupils. Pre-test I will do a pre-test to ensure that my hypothesis will be correct. I will take a stratified sample from year 11 and then random sample the number of data needed for each gender and investigate the correlation between height and weight. I will then put this into a scatter graph which should then show a positive correlation between the weight and the height of the students. I have chosen year 11 above year 7 as the puberty rate will have slowed as the students approach adulthood, and the results should be clearer. I am selecting 40 students, and I will now work out how many girls and boys I will use. For year 11, there are 86 females (51% approx), and 84 males (49% approx) and 170 for the whole year. Year Sample number for year group Girls Boys 11 40 (86/170)*40=20.235 rounds to 20. (84/170)*40=19.76 rounds to 20. These are the random sample of the stratified sample in numerical order: Females: 2, 6, 7, 17, 20, 23, 24, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 55, 60, 64, 69, 72, 79, 81, 86 Males: 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 95, 97, 98, 103, 105, 106, 111, 115, 123, 140, 161, 156, 164, 167, 170 Pre-test conclusion My graphs for my preliminary show that there is a positive correlation between weight and height, and that it is slightly different from females and males, as the males correlation is showing stronger than that of females. ...read more.

Middle

Cumulative Frequency graph A cumulative frequency graphs shows the total running frequency of the data in a graph, and allows you do plot where the median and inter-quartile ranges are. The line of best fit on the year 7 girl's cumulative frequency graph is flat and then all of a sudden steepens. This shows that after a certain point all the data is towards the higher end of my heights. This may suggest that some girls have not started puberty and not had their growth spurts, where as a lot of girls may have. Year 7 boys Heights (cm) Frequency Heights (cm) Cumulative frequency 135?h>140.5 2 135?h>140.5 2 140.5?h>145.5 3 140.5?h>145.5 5 145.5?h>-150.5 9 145.5?h>150.5 14 150.5?h>160.5 14 150.5?h>160.5 28 160.5?h>165.5 7 160.5?h>165.5 35 165.5?h>175 2 165.5?h>175 37 The modal class is 150.5?h>160.5 The median class is (37+1)/2=16 which means 150.5?h>160.5. Estimated mean: 5678.5/37=153.47 Heights (cm) 135?h>140.5 2 137.75 275.5 18975.0625 37950.125 140.5?h>145.5 3 142.5 427.5 20306.25 60918.75 145.5?h>150.5 9 147.5 1327.5 21756.25 195806.25 150.5?h>160.5 14 155 2170 24025 336350 160.5?h>165.5 7 162.5 1137.5 26406.25 184843.75 165.5?h>175 2 170.25 340.5 28985.0625 57970.125 Totals 37 5678.5 873839 Standard Deviation:= 7.96 cm The modal class and the median class are exactly the same as the year 7 girls. This may be because in year 7, girls and boys work at different puberty rates so the difference between them isn't as visible as in adults because the boys haven't started developing yet. However, the standard deviation is very different from the girls. As this one is much lower than the other, this suggests that the girls are more wide-spread due to puberty. As boys generally start puberty later, there is a much less variety to the outside data, which is why there is less of an average distance difference between each piece of the data. Scatter graph The graph shows a positive correlation as I predicted in my hypothesis. ...read more.

Conclusion

If I were to do it again, I may want to take 30 - 40 % of students from each year, instead of the initial 25 % I used. I would also include other years in my sample, so investigate how it would progress and possibly increase my variety of showing data, i.e. histograms and using spearmen's rank. I would also consider taking out more outliers to make sure my end results weren't skewed or anything by them and then maybe look at the data as a whole without grouping it first, to make it even more accurate. However, this is very time consuming. The approach I had in my hypothesis got supported the whole way through my findings - which height and weight had a positive correlation and that puberty affected the rates so that year 7 would be different to year 11 and that girls would be different to boys. I have found that the data I had suggests that the older you get, the more stable the heights and weights become, and they are not so all over the place and the clusters are tighter the older you get. I also found that the data suggests that in year 7 girls, there is a wider range compared to year 7 boys. This could be because of the puberty rates. By the time we get to the year 11 data, both girls and boys are pretty stable, of course there are some slightly off-the-cluster data, which is normal due to no human being is the same. All in all, what I have discovered is that my findings support my hypothesis, but if I were to investigate this again, I would do some things slightly differently, but some things I would keep very much the same - after all my data did support what I predicted in the first instance. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. A hypothesis is the outline of the idea/ideas which I will be testing and ...

    10 Sosay Kaiser Angel 8 124 10 Grimshaw Jane Bad Girls 10 95 10 Fox Serena Bad Girls 7 108 11 Cripp Justin M.T.V. Base 24 100 10 Dolt Anthony Big Brother 28 100 11 Donald Adam The Simpsons 28 103 10 Quershi Abduraheim Charmed 17 103 11 Slim Andre

  2. Mayfield. HYPOTHESIS 1: Boys at Mayfield School are Taller and Weigh more on ...

    Calculations: Year 7: 282 Divided by 1183 Multiplied by 360 = 86 Degrees Year 8: 270 Divided by 1183 Multiplied by 360 = 82 Degrees Year 9: 261 Divided by 1183 Multiplied by 360 = 79 Degrees Total 360 Degrees Mean and Mode of Frequency Data I will now find

  1. Maths Data Handling

    I also used the cumulative frequency curves for height and weight to predict percentages of students that had a height within a given range. For example I estimated how many boys in my sample had a weight between 50 and 65 kg.

  2. Statistics Mayfield High

    The lowest KS2 Maths result is also the lowest IQ result; however the highest IQ is not the highest KS2 result. The PMCC is 0.764 this shows that there is a strong relationship between the variables in a positive direction: this is shown with the line of best of fit.

  1. maths coursework-Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations

    height of 1.50 m: y = 59.706x - 44.838 So y = (59.706 X 1.50) - 44.838 = 44.721 Using the equation of my line of best fit for girls, I can predict that a girl with the height of 1.50 m will have a weight of 44.72 kg.

  2. Mayfield data

    between 130- 139 cm, which shows that my data may be misleading or there is a lapse in growth. Both Girls and Boys have average heights and are fairly balanced and of equal size. Although my Sample shows that boys on some occasion grow to above average height such as

  1. Maths open box

    year 9 chosen males showing height weight surname and forename Year 8 Chosen Females 1 Dison Ayeshia 1.55 60 2 Cat Bev 1.61 52 3 Watson Bethany 1.58 52 4 Munro Chelsea 1.43 40 5 Packham Dawn 1.58 40 6 Bamford Emma 1.61 48 7 Connify Elizabeth 1.59 38 8

  2. Hypothesis"The taller you are, the bigger is your foot length". I think my hypothesis ...

    foot length I added together all of the sample of each and divided by 100 (the number in my sample). Height: 15885/100 = 158.85 Foot length: 2371.8/100 = 23.718 The median is the middle number in the list of each sample, To work this out I found out the middle

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work