• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 2973

Mayfields data handling

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mayfield’s high school: GCSE Mathematics

image00.png

Introduction

In this coursework I will be investigating the contrast between girls and boys from years 11 and 7, in height and weight.  I am going to be using various methods to verify my hypothesis including producing graphs and diagrams.  I will be collecting my samples from Mayfield’s secondary school and will also be using stratified sampling to get accurate results from the samples.  I will then be putting the samples in to a series of graphs mainly scatter diagrams and cumulative frequency graphs as this will help me verify my hypothesis.

Hypothesis

In this investigation I predict that as the height of a pupil increases so     will the weights of the pupil.  I also think that as the males get older they will have a greater height and weight than the females.  But the females will have a greater height and weight than the males when they are younger; I feel this is due to the variations in puberty between males and females.      

Stratified sampling

The sampling method I am going to be using is stratified sampling.  This type of sampling involves calculations unlike random and quota sampling which do not use a stratified approach to sampling.

...read more.

Middle

Boyoh

Jake

Male

1.54

43

7

Brann

Jamle

Male

1.73

53

Year 9 Samples KS3 (key stage three)

Year Group

Surname

Forename 1

Gender

Height (m)

Weight (kg)

9

Ali

Aisha

Female

1.52

45

9

Ali

Hannah

Female

1.62

52

9

Al-Jiboun

Tarah

Female

1.8

60

9

Amjad

Samia

Female

1.55

36

9

Aneillz

Christina

Female

1.53

65

9

Ashworth

Samantha

Female

1.6

48

9

Atkins

Patience

Female

1.57

40

9

Bagnall

veronica

Female

1.49

37

9

Barlow

Billie

Female

1.62

49

9

Barlow

Sandra

Female

1.64

55

9

Bellfield

Janet

Female

1.58

40

9

Bennett

Susan

Female

1.6

41

9

Bertwistle

Laura

Female

1.48

47

9

Billard

Hailey

Female

1.63

52

9

Boneheyo

Olivia

Female

1.65

49

9

Border

Lucy

Female

1.57

38

9

Edwards

John

Male

1.60

58

9

Elliot

William

Male

1.65

50

9

Ether

Paul

Male

1.53

45

9

Fagg

Simon

Male

1.75

60

9

Fenton

Aaron

Male

1.85

55

9

Gibb

Mike

Male

1.75

52

9

Glenn

Edward

Male

1.48

40

9

Gorst

Lee

Male

1.44

49

9

Gregory

Andrew

Male

1.82

66

9

Grimshaw

Chris

Male

1.70

50

9

Gunet

Armede

Male

1.60

68

9

Hall

Patrick

Male

1.60

55

9

Handergon

Ben

Male

1.58

50

9

Hardy

Matt

Male

1.70

47

Year 11 samples KS4 (key stage four)

Year Group

Surname

Forename 1

Gender

Height (m)

...read more.

Conclusion

                                                                                                                                                        Upper Quartile= 166

                                                                                                                                                         Interquartile range= 18

I have noticed that the highest increase was in frequency between {1.5<x<1.6} and {1.6<x<1.7} (16-4=12) and therefore this is the most common height, whereas between {1.8<x<1.9} and {1.9<x<2.0} the difference was 1 (30-29=1) and this was the least increase in height and therefore the least common.

image09.png

Lower Quartile= 37

Median= 42

Upper Quartile= 48

Interquartile range= 11

I have noticed that the highest increase was in frequency between {40<x<50} and {50<x<60} (21-5=16) and therefore this is the most common weight, whereas between {70<x<80} and {80<x<90} the difference was 1 (30-29=1) and this was the least increase in weight and therefore the least common.

From my investigation in the year 11 height and weight using cumulative frequency I have found out that the most common height is between 160cm to 170cm and the most common weight is between 50 and 60 kg.


Evaluation of Hypothesis

In my opinion I feel that my investigation was successful, I believe that the evidence that I have proved successfully was key to my investigation and inevitably I have proved that my prediction was correct. Even though I could not evaluate all the students heights and weight I still believe that the trends that I discovered would be repeated if I extended my sample would be the same. In general I believe my hypothesis was correct.

Candidate Name: Ryan Crilly  Candidate number: 3040  Centre Number: 30104

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Mayfield. HYPOTHESIS 1: Boys at Mayfield School are Taller and Weigh more on ...

    BOYS HEIGHTS: BOYS Height (cm) Cumulative Frequency Less than 140 2 Less than 150 2 Less than 160 8 Less than 170 16 Less than 180 17 Less than 190 20 Less than 200 20 Using a Statistical Program that I have downloaded I entered my data into the

  2. Statistics GCSE Coursework. Height and weight of pupils. The sampling method I am ...

    Year 7 1.5?x<1.6 Year 9 1.6?x<1.7 Year 11 1.6?x<1.7 Results for weight (kg): Modal interval (males and females) Year 7 40?x<50 Year 9 50?x<60 Year 11 40?x<50 As you can see these results are inconclusive and do not support my hypothesis so I looked at the means instead: Average height and weight for females: Mean height (m)

  1. Maths Data Handling

    0, 0, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 8, 8 70 0, 0, 2, 2, 3, 4 80 0 90 2 Conclusion Weights (kg) Mean Modal Class Interval Median Range Girls 50.3 40-50 49 36 Boys 55 50-60 52 66 All three measures in the sample were higher for boys than

  2. Maths: Data Handling Coursework

    I thought that it wouldn't be as reliable if I used the same sample size of boys and girls because the actual total of girls were higher than of boys. For each year group, I am going to draw a stem and leaf diagram.

  1. Is there a difference between male and female conversational styles in today's society?

    NVC unseen she indicates someone to come in: A.B: because I'm not into all this love marriage thing init The use of 'init' is commonly found in Luton, it is something the youth have picked up on and have been comfortable in using.

  2. mayfield high school handling data coursework

    My population is boys and girls in year 7-11, so my sample size would be about 7-10% of the overall population. I have chosen this size because I feel that this size would give a fair representation of the entire population.

  1. Data Handling - GCSE Coursework

    I should also, to compare the weights and heights to see if my hypothesis is correct, do a frequency polygon showing both height and weight information on the same graph. This will help me compare the heights and the weights.

  2. Maxi Product

    My Maxi Product is (8, 8) which equals to 64. I got this by doing the partitions of the number and then with the partition I multiplied it to the power of 2. Now i am going to do this with an odd number to see the different results.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work