• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 1606

Mechanics 2 Coursework - Assumptions related to both the model and the experiment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mechanics 2 Coursework

image00.png


Mechanics 2 Coursework

Assumptions related to both the model and the experimentimage01.png

Assumptions that are made for both the model and the experiment:

  • The gravity, g, is taken to be 9.8ms-1
  • The ball is taken to be a particle
  • The accuracy of the timing is subjective – the start and end times are based upon the testers’ judgement.
  • Readings are taken from the bottom of the ball and not the centre.
  • The downward direction is taken to be positive, therefore any rebounds are negative.
  • Air resistance is not taken into account.
  • Values are taken to 2 d.p.

image12.png

Manipulating the modelimage19.png

Firstly, a theoretical equation needs to be obtained linking e (the elasticity of the ball), h1 (the downward height) and h2 (the rebound height).  This can be obtained using the equations of linear motion.

When dropping the ball:

s = h1                a = g                u = 0                v = ?

        Using         v2 = u2 + 2as

                v2 = 0 + (2gh1)

image14.png

                v =  2h1g

When rebounding the ball:

s = -h2                a = -g                u = ?                v = 0

        Using         v2 = u2 + 2as

                u2 = v2 – 2as

                u2 = -2 x –h2 x –g

image14.png

u = -  2h2g        

Using v = -eu, we can find an equation in terms of e.

image14.pngimage35.png

                2h1g = -e(-  2h2g)

image14.pngimage35.png

                2h1g = e  2h2g

image03.pngimage02.png

                     e = image04.png

image05.png

     e =

From the above model, it can be seen that the gradient will give us a value of e2.

...read more.

Middle

                2hog = 0 + gt

image15.pngimage16.png

t =image04.png

From this, the final equation for the sum time can be established:

image17.png

image18.png

 =

Where h is the initial drop height, g is the gravitational pull (at 9.8ms-1 and e is the elasticity (which is found using the first equation obtained in terms of h1 and h2)

image12.pngimage12.png

Conducting the Experimentimage20.png

Method:image21.png

image22.png

Other methods used to reduce the experimenter errors were to have two people checking the rebound height – this lowers the chance of experimenter judgement affecting the results adversely.  The whole method process was used for both the rebound heights and time taken to stop bouncing.  The results are shown on the following page.


Results:

Experiment One – rebound height (in cms)

Drop Height / Drop no.

1

2

3

4

5

Mean

100cm

50

52.5

53

50

51

51.3

80cm

27

29

28

27

28

27.8

60cm

21

22

19

20

21

20.6

40cm

12

11

11.5

12

12.5

11.8

20cm

9

5

6

7

7

6.8

Experiment Two – Time Taken to stop bouncing (in seconds)

Drop Height / Drop no.

1

2

3

4

5

Mean

100cm

4

3.8

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

80cm

3.3

3.2

3.1

3.1

3.2

3.18

60cm

2.9

2.8

3

2.8

2.5

2.8

40cm

2.5

2.6

2.5

2.6

2.4

2.52

20cm

1.9

1.9

2

1.8

2

1.92

image12.png

Applying the model to the resultsimage23.png

For values of e:

Using the first equation,

image05.png

e =

Using the graph, values for the maximum, minimum and mean gradients can be obtained, thus giving maximum, minimum and mean values of e.

image24.png

Mean value of e =

e = 0.75 to 2 d.p

image25.png

Maximum value of e =

e = 0.77 to 2 d.p

image26.png

Minimum

...read more.

Conclusion

Initial results indicated that taking the means, and rounding them to 2.d.p may have caused the difference between the model and the actual results.  However, workings have taken place using the maximum and minimum times and values of e, which also show a similar difference between the model and the actual results.

image33.png

Revision of the process

image34.png

In order to improve the model:

  • Fewer assumptions would be used
  • Air resistance would be taken into account
  • Also the fact that the ball is not a fixed particle needs to be taken into account – this is a major contributing factor to the difference between the model and the results.

In order to improve the experiment:

  • Take more measurements for the times and rebound heights.
  • Use a technological method to measure the times and rebound heights to increase the validity of the results.
  • Increase the accuracy of the value of gravity.

The effects that these amendments would have are that the accuracy of the results would be increased.  This, in turn, would mean the value of e would be more exact, thus giving a model that gives times closer to the experimental times.

image12.png

Page

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Statistics coursework Edexcell

    Where as boys in year nine seem to be smaller than year sevens and year eights are larger than year nine for both genders. With respect to the hypothesis of this investigation the results show the following: Hypothesis Proved or Disproved Evidence That year seven boys will be smaller than

  2. Investigate the factors affecting the motion of a trolley.

    2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4 3.076 3.002 3.020 3.033 23.08 6 1.632 1.673 1.626 1.644 42.59 8 1.273 1.214 1.224 1.237 56.59 10 1.091 1.066 1.069 1.075 65.10 12 1.011 1.078 1.007 1.032 67.83 14 0.913 0.905 0.936 0.918 76.25 16 0.818 0.847 0.835 0.833 84.00 18 0.761

  1. Statistics Coursework

    the two sets of data and put it into a bar chart so that they could be compared. Looking at this bar graph, the results for the different genders appear much the same, with the median and mode results being identical.

  2. Investigate the effect of temperature on the bounce height of a squash ball.

    The only anomaly I got was at 10�C because the temperature kept dropping which made the average too low. I decided to do the test for 10�C again and my results were much better. The average result for 70�C was lower than the line of best fit because I think

  1. Physics Coursework: Bouncing Balls.

    This can be related to our ball bouncing. The greater the velocity the greater the force exerted on the ground which causes a greater compression and expansion of the ball propelling it to a higher bounce. This evidence almost entirely backs up my original prediction, however I found that the

  2. Liquid chromatography is a technique used to separate components of a mixture to isolate ...

    Retention time (min) Efficiency (plates/m) Efficiency (%) Symmetry (10%) height 2 5 3.57 62758 90.9 1.07 5 5 3.55 69063 100 1.23 10 10 3.57 67451 97.7 1.07 20 20 3.77 66302 96.0 1.38 50 100 3.77 67575 97.8 1.05 100 100 3.80 68538 99.2 1.09 200 200 3.92 72078 104.4 1.41 350 500 4.12 70753 102.4 1.39 500

  1. Mayfield Coursework

    I would then enter the heights for the boys and girls into separate stem and leaf diagrams and compare them. Firstly though I would need to highlight the heights of both the year 8 boys and year 8 girls in accumulative frequency graphs: Heights for year 8 boys Height (cm)

  2. My physics coursework is an experiment with gravity. The experiment is done by creating ...

    Weight of putty Time taken to fall 5 g 0.82 seconds 4 g 0.99 seconds 3 g 1.29 seconds 2 g 1.36 seconds 1 g 1.56 seconds Although there is a much greater range between the 5g and 1g tests in this set of experiments they still show the same basic pattern.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work