• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 1606

Mechanics 2 Coursework - Assumptions related to both the model and the experiment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mechanics 2 Coursework

image00.png


Mechanics 2 Coursework

Assumptions related to both the model and the experimentimage01.png

Assumptions that are made for both the model and the experiment:

  • The gravity, g, is taken to be 9.8ms-1
  • The ball is taken to be a particle
  • The accuracy of the timing is subjective – the start and end times are based upon the testers’ judgement.
  • Readings are taken from the bottom of the ball and not the centre.
  • The downward direction is taken to be positive, therefore any rebounds are negative.
  • Air resistance is not taken into account.
  • Values are taken to 2 d.p.

image12.png

Manipulating the modelimage19.png

Firstly, a theoretical equation needs to be obtained linking e (the elasticity of the ball), h1 (the downward height) and h2 (the rebound height).  This can be obtained using the equations of linear motion.

When dropping the ball:

s = h1                a = g                u = 0                v = ?

        Using         v2 = u2 + 2as

                v2 = 0 + (2gh1)

image14.png

                v =  2h1g

When rebounding the ball:

s = -h2                a = -g                u = ?                v = 0

        Using         v2 = u2 + 2as

                u2 = v2 – 2as

                u2 = -2 x –h2 x –g

image14.png

u = -  2h2g        

Using v = -eu, we can find an equation in terms of e.

image14.pngimage35.png

                2h1g = -e(-  2h2g)

image14.pngimage35.png

                2h1g = e  2h2g

image03.pngimage02.png

                     e = image04.png

image05.png

     e =

From the above model, it can be seen that the gradient will give us a value of e2.

...read more.

Middle

                2hog = 0 + gt

image15.pngimage16.png

t =image04.png

From this, the final equation for the sum time can be established:

image17.png

image18.png

 =

Where h is the initial drop height, g is the gravitational pull (at 9.8ms-1 and e is the elasticity (which is found using the first equation obtained in terms of h1 and h2)

image12.pngimage12.png

Conducting the Experimentimage20.png

Method:image21.png

image22.png

Other methods used to reduce the experimenter errors were to have two people checking the rebound height – this lowers the chance of experimenter judgement affecting the results adversely.  The whole method process was used for both the rebound heights and time taken to stop bouncing.  The results are shown on the following page.


Results:

Experiment One – rebound height (in cms)

Drop Height / Drop no.

1

2

3

4

5

Mean

100cm

50

52.5

53

50

51

51.3

80cm

27

29

28

27

28

27.8

60cm

21

22

19

20

21

20.6

40cm

12

11

11.5

12

12.5

11.8

20cm

9

5

6

7

7

6.8

Experiment Two – Time Taken to stop bouncing (in seconds)

Drop Height / Drop no.

1

2

3

4

5

Mean

100cm

4

3.8

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

80cm

3.3

3.2

3.1

3.1

3.2

3.18

60cm

2.9

2.8

3

2.8

2.5

2.8

40cm

2.5

2.6

2.5

2.6

2.4

2.52

20cm

1.9

1.9

2

1.8

2

1.92

image12.png

Applying the model to the resultsimage23.png

For values of e:

Using the first equation,

image05.png

e =

Using the graph, values for the maximum, minimum and mean gradients can be obtained, thus giving maximum, minimum and mean values of e.

image24.png

Mean value of e =

e = 0.75 to 2 d.p

image25.png

Maximum value of e =

e = 0.77 to 2 d.p

image26.png

Minimum

...read more.

Conclusion

Initial results indicated that taking the means, and rounding them to 2.d.p may have caused the difference between the model and the actual results.  However, workings have taken place using the maximum and minimum times and values of e, which also show a similar difference between the model and the actual results.

image33.png

Revision of the process

image34.png

In order to improve the model:

  • Fewer assumptions would be used
  • Air resistance would be taken into account
  • Also the fact that the ball is not a fixed particle needs to be taken into account – this is a major contributing factor to the difference between the model and the results.

In order to improve the experiment:

  • Take more measurements for the times and rebound heights.
  • Use a technological method to measure the times and rebound heights to increase the validity of the results.
  • Increase the accuracy of the value of gravity.

The effects that these amendments would have are that the accuracy of the results would be increased.  This, in turn, would mean the value of e would be more exact, thus giving a model that gives times closer to the experimental times.

image12.png

Page

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Investigate the effect of temperature on the bounce height of a squash ball.

    Other than that my results are very accurate as they are all very close to my line of best fit suggesting that there aren't any anomalies although some points are further away from my line of best fit than others.

  2. Investigate the factors affecting the motion of a trolley.

    2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4 3.076 3.002 3.020 3.033 23.08 6 1.632 1.673 1.626 1.644 42.59 8 1.273 1.214 1.224 1.237 56.59 10 1.091 1.066 1.069 1.075 65.10 12 1.011 1.078 1.007 1.032 67.83 14 0.913 0.905 0.936 0.918 76.25 16 0.818 0.847 0.835 0.833 84.00 18 0.761

  1. Liquid chromatography is a technique used to separate components of a mixture to isolate ...

    -2.67 3.57 65793 95.4 1.41 1 in 50 0.00129 -2.89 3.58 67830 98.4 1.10 1 in 100 0.000645 -3.19 3.58 66987 97.1 1.39 1 in 500 0.000129 -3.89 3.58 67785 98.3 1.31 1 in 800 8.16?10-5 -4.09 3.57 68484 99.3 1.27 1 in 1000 6.45?10-5 -4.19 3.58 68971 100 1.13

  2. Mayfield Maths Coursework

    This relationship is that, the higher the Key Stage 2 Score the higher the IQ. From the graph I can also see that there are a few points in the graph that does not follow this pattern. These points are called outliers I can see from this graph that there

  1. Maths Stats coursework

    Gemma 6 5 Wilson Alice 6 6 Durst Freda 6 7 LQ-6.75 Brown Emily 7 8 Fox Serena 7 9 Johnson Leigha 9 10 Watkinson-Powell Anna 9 11 Barry Kayleigh 10 12 Collins Louise 10 13 Bale Jemma 11 14 Hughes Donna 12 15 Median-13 Ullah Lisa 14 16 Black

  2. Mayfield Coursework

    I then choose quartile from the selection. Then after that I highlight the data that I am using in the array box and then press 1 in the quartile box. To choose the upper quartile I would do the same thing but instead I would press 3 in the quartile box.

  1. Physics Coursework: Bouncing Balls.

    The straight line of the graph remains constant throughout. As I stated in my prediction, the ball will bounced to a height less than its original height due to gravitational potential energy being converted into thermal energy. The ball gained gravitational potential energy when it is lifted off of the floor, some off this energy was converted into heat energy due to friction and compression/expansion.

  2. Statistics Coursework

    To find the IQ of each student, I simply have to read it off of the spreadsheet. However, the KS2 results are separated into the different subjects, and so I will have to total them to ensure that the data can be more accurately plotted and compared.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work