• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

My hypothesis is that people with siblings have a lower IQ than people without siblings. Also that people with lower IQ's have lower KS2 results.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Data Handling Task

Matthew Moorhouse

Hypothesis

My hypothesis is that people with siblings have a lower IQ than people without siblings.   Also that people with lower IQ’s have lower KS2 results.

IQ Levels

        Using all the pupils available for KS4, I made a scatter graph showing how many siblings a pupil has against their IQ.   I saw several points, which were extreme so I deleted these from my graphs.   At this point I looked for a line of best fit but the line was almost horizontal so it would have been of no use.   After this I made a bar graph so I could see how many pupils had a given IQ.   This showed a concentration of pupils around the 100 – 104 area.  

        I produced several bar graphs so I could easily see any relation between sibling numbers and IQ.    The sort of relation I was looking for was that pupils with no siblings had a higher IQ than those with lots of siblings.

The number of pupils in certain sibling groups from KS4 was in some cases very low (11 in one case).

...read more.

Middle

In fig 1 I found the average of the KS2 results for each sibling group,  however there is very little difference between the average score.   The only real difference is in the 6+ sibling group were the Science and English results are highest in the table,  but in Maths the 0 siblings are highest.   This table dispels my theory that pupils with, 0 siblings have better results than pupils with siblings.

        I then went on to make fig 2 (which uses the data from fig 1),  so I could see any sort of trend easier.   Although fig 2 didn’t quite achieve what I was looking for it did show a drop in marks towards the higher sibling count groups,  but a strange peak in the 6 and above sibling count group.   After examining fig 2 I averaged the 3 subject results again so I could better see the trend.  

...read more.

Conclusion

0; 3.888889

    4.013889

    4.013889

4

    3.857143

    3.75

    3.892857

5

    4

    3.909091

    3.818182

6 to 12

    4.10989

    4.098901

4.296703

Fig 2. image00.png

Fig 3.

image01.png

Fig 4

image02.png

KS2 Conclusion

From these results my conclusion is that if you are an only child or have 6+ siblings you have a better chance of getting a high KS2 result.   If you have 1 to 5 siblings your results will get lower as your siblings increase.

Final Conclusion

        My original hypotheses do not stand up when confronted with this evidence.   An increase in the number of siblings does not result in a decrease in IQ,  but those with 5 siblings stand out as having a higher average IQ.

        A lower IQ does not result in lower KS2 results.   The pupils with the highest KS2 results have an average IQ and the pupils with the highest IQ have an average KS2 result (I found this by comparing Fig 3and Fig 4).

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE IQ Correlation section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE IQ Correlation essays

  1. Perform a statistical enquiry that will either prove or disapprove my hypothesis.

    As a result any number between 1 and number of pupils in that stratum had an equal chance of being chosen. This method gave me all the Random numbers I needed. Now I knew which samples to take from the database.

  2. Comparison of SATs results to obtain statistical data on students.

    7-3= 4 The range of levels in maths in 1999 is: Range= 7-3= 4 English. The mean level for females in English in 1999 is: ?fX??f= 4.89 The mean level is 5 for females in English in 1999. The mean level for males in English in 1999 is: ?fX??f= 5.04

  1. The 3 statements I am going to investigate are: -Does the gender of the ...

    I will now move on to expressing my data and back up my hypothesis further using a method called standard deviation. The symbol used for standard deviation is (a Greek symbol pronounced sigma). "Standard deviation is the statistical measure of the amount by which a set of values differs from

  2. An Investigation into Gender-Based Stereotyping Using IQ Estimates

    They were then given another scale and told to indicate what they thought their fathers IQ score would be. The results were added together, for each category and divided by ten to give a mean IQ estimate. The results were put in a table and a combined mean estimated IQ was obtained.

  1. Maths Coursework: investigation into the correlation between IQ and KS2 results

    The final data set is as follows: Year Group Number of students % of the total school* Number out of 100 ** 7 282 23.8 24 8 270 22.8 23 9 261 22.1 22 10 200 16.9 17 11 170 14.4 14 No.

  2. My hypotheses are: -1. People's average SAT and average GCSE results will have a ...

    (Amount of boys and boys) = 310.66 55 = 5. 648363636 = 5.65 (2.D.P) GCSE mean point = (Sum of GCSE average) (Amount of boys and girls) = 294.36 55 = 5.352 = 5.35 (2.D.P) Analysis From my three scatter graphs I notice that their is a strong positive correlation between average SAT and GCSE results.

  1. Mayfield Maths Coursework

    Explanation on correlation This is a following scatter graph on the following correlation and is a positive correlation between the less weights you gain the less number of sick days you will have. The correlation is showing that if people were to gain a certain less amount of weight they would have a less amount of sick days.

  2. HYPOTHESIS Blonde girls are more intelligent than non blonde girls. Blonde girls that ...

    and therefore different methods will have to be employed. I will again have to use relevant data, techniques etc to present and prove/disprove my hypothesis. Again I will have to make all of the previously mentioned considerations as to what methods of analysis are the most effective. For this I will use: * Scatter graphs and lines of best fit.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work