• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 2573

# Number Grid

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kim Williams        St Austell College         GCSE Maths

Number Grid

For this piece of coursework I have been asked to identify the connections between calculating the top numbers in a square sized grid with the bottom numbers. This is to identify what connections there are for the four sets of numbers.

This is the 10 x 10 number grid, which I will use to investigate the products of the top and bottoms numbers when multiplied.

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100

This is achieved through the following rule:

• A box is drawn around four numbers
• The top left number is multiplied with the bottom right number to find the product
• Then the top right number is multiplied with the bottom left number to find the product
• Then through calculating these products the difference will be attained

For example

2 x2 Grid

12 13

22 23

12 x 23 = 276    The difference from the two products are 10.

13 x 22 = 286   This is how I worked the difference out: 286-276 = 10

From this example I can now form my hypothesis, which in this case is a statement. I will aim to either prove my hypothesis correct or incorrect through investigating further.

Hypothesis

## “Calculating the product of the top left and bottom right number will be less than the product of the top right and bottom left number when calculated”.

This is a general hypothesis that I will aim to prove throughout the investigation.

## Investigate further

I will start by developing the task and investigating different sized grids.

Middle

7   8   9 10        7x40 = 280         The difference for this 4x4 square grid is 90.

17 18 19 20        10x37 = 370         This calculation was worked out by: 370-280 = 90

27 28 29 30

37 38 39 40

### I will do another 4x4 square grid to prove that this is correct.

45 46 47 48     45x78 = 3510    The difference for this 4x4 square grid is 90.

55 56 57 58     48x75 = 3600    This calculation was worked out by: 3600-3510 = 90

65 66 67 68

75 76 77 78

### From the calculations of the 4x4 square grids above the difference of the products is 90.

The algebraic calculation for the 4x4 square grid is the following:

 n n + 3 n + 30 n + 33

(n + 3)(n + 30) – n(n+33)

n² +30n+3n+90-n² -33n

n²+33n+90 - n²- 33n   = 90

From this calculation it shows that the answer is the correct, hence the 4x4 square grid product difference is 90.

This algebraic formula proves that it can be used for any 4x4 square grid in a 10x10 master grid.

I will now calculate the products of the 5x5 square grid to find the difference.

## 35 36 37 38 39        35x79 = 2765    The difference for this 5x5 square grid is 160.

45 46 47 48 49        39x75 = 2925    This calculation was worked out by:

55 56 57 58 59

## 65 66 67 68 69        55x99 = 5445     The difference for this 5x5 square grid is 160.

75 56 77 78 79        59x95 = 5605     This calculation was worked out by:

85 86 87 88 89                                    5605-5445 = 160

95 96 97 98 99

## The algebraic calculation for the 5x5 square grid is the following:

 n n + 4 n + 40 n + 44

(n + 4)(n + 40) – n(n + 44)

n² +40n+4n+160-n² -44n

n² + 44n+160 - n² - 44n =160

Conclusion

I decided to carry out two examples for each individual size grid in a 10x10 master gird, as I wanted to ensure that I was conducting the calculations correctly. It therefore gave accurate and reliable results. Although I did not do two examples for the individual sized grids in the 6x6 master grid or for the rectangle size grids. This was because my method procedure was correct throughout the calculations for the squares in the 10x10 master grids so I did not feel it was necessary.

From the results/findings in the 6x6 master grid table it shows that the product differences of the 2x2, 3x3 and 5x5 square grids are multiples of six but not the 4x4 square grid product difference. The calculation for the 4x4 product difference is correct and as noted doesn’t follow the same pattern as the other square grid sizes.

The rectangles product differences increases by 40 each time as the grid size goes up, which proves my prediction correct. I stated in my prediction that as ‘the rectangle sizes goes up i.e. 2x5, 3x5 and 4x5 the product difference will increase. This would be because the rectangle grid sizes are increasing and therefore would have a higher number in the bottom left and right corner of the rectangle to multiply by when calculating’ From the prediction I showed an examples of an 2x5 and a 4x5 grid to justify my prediction.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences essays

1. ## I am going to investigate the difference between the products of the numbers in ...

4 star(s)

+ A2-A2 +(GA(W-1))-(GA(W-1) + A(L-1)-A(L-1) = G(W-1)(L-1) Extension: Rotating 90and 180 (Old values, before rotation, will be marked with a ?1?. New values, after rotation, will be marked with a ?2?) Using our previous rule, working out whether rotation the rectangle by 90, 180 or 270 degrees would affect the difference is easy.

2. ## I am going to investigate by taking a square shape of numbers from a ...

4 star(s)

Then I move on and use the 3x4, 4x5 and the 5x6. number Left corner x right corner Right corner x left corner Products difference 1 9x30=270 10x29=290 20 2 41x62=2542 42x61=2562 20 3 77x98=7546 78x97=7566 20 I have noticed that the products difference of 2x3 rectangles in a 10x10 grid equal to 20.

1. ## I am going to investigate taking a square of numbers from a grid, multiplying ...

3 star(s)

Straight away we can call the top left corner 'x'. x - - - - - - - - In this 3x3 square the only numbers in the grid we need to use are the corner numbers, so when drawing the 3x3 squares, with expressions in, from now on I will leave those middle numbers out.

2. ## Number Grids Investigation Coursework

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61

1. ## Number Grid Investigation.

Below are a few examples of 3 X 2 squares taken from a 10 wide grid. I am still using the formula: (TL X BR) - (TR X BL) Example 1. 36 37 38 46 47 48 (36 X 48) - (38 X 46) = 20. Product difference = 20.

2. ## Investigation of diagonal difference.

7 x 8 grid 7 x 7 grid 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42

1. ## For other 3-step stairs, investigate the relationship between the stair total and the position ...

For example for a 10x10 numbered grid using a 6-step stair the formula is 21x-315 then we increase the grid size by 1, 11x11 and using the same 6-stepped stair approach the formula is 21x-350, etc. We can clearly see the constant number [35] is consistent every time the grid size increases by [1].

2. ## Number Grid Investigation.

I can see from the results that for every multiplication and subtraction carried out the difference will always be 10. Can this be true for any square size ? I shall carry this formula on, and investigate further and see if this works for different sized selection squares e.g.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to
improve your own work