• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 2272

# Number grid

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mathematics Coursework; Number Grid

I have been asked to investigate a mathematical problem, in this piece of work I will explore the problem investigating a number of variables, using algebra to prove that the results hold for any combination of number.

12 x 23 = 276

13 x 23 = 286

The difference between the above two products is equal to 10.

I will repeat this using different numbers to see if there is a recurring pattern.

35 x 46 = 1610

36 x 45 = 1620

The difference between the above two products is equal to 10.

I predict that if I work out the following, the difference will be equal to 10.

38 x 49 =

39 x 48 =

I will now check to see if I am correct.

38 x 49 = 1862

39 x 48 = 1872

I was correct there is a difference of 10.

I am now going to try to prove that this holds for any 2 by 2 square using algebra.

Let n be the top left number and n + 11 be the bottom right number.

n(n+11) = n²+11n

Let n + 1 be the top right number and n + 10 be the bottom left number.

(n+1)(n+10) = n²+n+10n+10

= n²+11n+10

I will now subtract the two algebraic products to get an overall product.

n²+11n+10

n²+11n       -

+10

This proves that the difference is always 10

I have proved that the above results hold for any 2 by 2 square.

This shows that for any 2 by 2 square the difference will always be equal to 10.

To extend this investigation I am going to investigate the effect of changing the shape of the box.

Middle

This shows that the difference is 60, I will use a 2 by 7 rectangle to see if I am correct.

1 x 17 = 17

7 x 11 = 77

The difference between the above two products is equal to 60, I was correct.

I will now use algebra to try and prove that this holds for any 2 by p rectangle.

Let n be the top left number and n + p + 9 be the bottom right number.

n(n+p)-9 = n²+np+9n

Let n + p - 1 be the top right number and n + 10 be the bottom left number.

(n+10)(n+p-1) = n²+np-9n+10P-10

I will now subtract the two algebraic products to get an overall product.

n²+np-9n+10P-10

n²+np+9n           -

10p-10

This proves that the difference is always 10P-10

The above algebra tells me that for any 2 by p square the difference is always 10P-10.

To extend the investigation further I am going to investigate the effect of changing the size of the square, I will begin with a 3 by 3 square.

35 x 57 = 1995

37 x 55 = 2035

The difference between the above two products is equal to 40.

I am now going to try to prove that this holds for any 3 by 3 square using algebra.

Let n be the top left number and n + 22 be the bottom right number.

n(n+22) = n²+22n

Let n + 2 be the top right number and n + 20 be the bottom left number.

(n+2)(n+20) = n²+2n+20n+40

= n²+22n+40

I will now subtract the two algebraic products to get an overall product.

n²+22n+40

n²+22n       -

+40

Conclusion

(n+1)(n+w) = n²+nw+w+1

I will now subtract the two algebraic products to get an overall product.

n²+nw+w+1

n²+nw+1    -

+w

This proves that the difference is always equal to w

I have proved that the above results hold for any n by w square. W is equal to the size of the overall number grid.

It shows that the rule applies to any combination of letters or numbers, within its limits, there are certain limitations which mean that the solution will not hold for every number, it will not hold for any grid which contains 100 or more numbers, (in other words greater than 10 by 10), this shows that although that the solution does hold for most possibilities certain limitations mean that it cannot fit for absolutely every possibility.

I will now co-ordinate all three of my variables to see if there is any link, when I changed the size of square I discovered that the difference of any m by m square was equal to 10 (p-1)², when I changed 10 (p-1), already I can spot that the only difference between these two differences is that the square difference is squared, and the rectangle difference isn’t.

In conclusion, I have learnt that the by simply exploring and investigating different variables you can discover that there are certain links and connected outcomes, from my investigations I have discovered that the differences that I have found, hold for that particular shape or grid size, I have proved this algebraically, providing the general solution which shows that it holds for any number or letter.

Robert Shaw

Candidate Number: 1075 Centre Number: 41284

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences essays

1. ## Number Grid Aim: The aim of this investigation is to formulate an algebraic equation ...

3 star(s)

2 x 6 Rectangle 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 x 16 = 16 6 x 11 = 66 ? Difference = 50 My prediction appears to be correct. I also predict that the 2 x 7 rectangle will have a difference of

2. ## Investigation of diagonal difference.

From discovering this I think it's safe to assume that all coinciding square size cutouts anywhere on a 7 x 8 grid have the same diagonal differences of coinciding square size cutouts anywhere on a 7 x 7, as this was the case with 8 x 7 and 8 x 8 grids.

1. ## Number Grid Investigation.

Abbreviated formulas 'z' => width of grid. 'n' => width of square within grid. 'd' => depth of square. For 2 X 2, 3 X 3, 4 X 4 etc... 1. z ( n - 1 )� For 3 X 2, 4 X 2, 5 X 2 etc...

2. ## Algebra Investigation - Grid Square and Cube Relationships

that each box follows a certain trend (each progressive increase in width shows an overall increase in the difference by +20). It is possible to use the 3x2, 3 and 4 rectangles above to find the overall, constant formula for any 3xw rectangle on a 10x10 grid, by implementing the formulae below to find a general calculation and grid rectangle.

1. ## Investigate the differences between products in a controlled sized grid.

equation for any size e square box in a 10 by 10 grid. Size of Box Relationship between square numbers 2 by 2 (2-1) �*10 3 by 3 (3-1) �*10 4 by 4 (4-1) �*10 5 by 5 (5-1) �*10 I am now going to try and form an algebraic equation using the information in the table.

2. ## For other 3-step stairs, investigate the relationship between the stair total and the position ...

The results are conclusive and consistent, proving the theory to be accurate and reliable. Using any of the algebra equation from the above table, e.g. 15x-180 or 15x-220 we can prove the results for any 5-step grid: 11 Formula: 15x-180 21 22 1: 15x51-180= 585 31 32 33 2: 21+31+41+51+32+42+52+43+53+54+11+22+33+44+55=

1. ## Investigate Borders - a fencing problem.

needed for border number 6 using the formula, I found out, above: nth term = 4 x 6 + 10 = 34 Common Difference nth Term Results My prediction was 34 which is the correct answer, for the number of squares needed for border number 6, and which also proves that the formula is in working order.

2. ## Maths coursework. For my extension piece I decided to investigate stairs that ascend along ...

for any given stair-number of a 3-stair shape on a 5 x 5 grid, I will draw out the 3-stair shape on a 5 x 5 grid in terms of 'n' and 'g'. Grid: 5 x 5 21 22 23 24 25 16 n + 2g 18 19 20 11

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to