• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
13. 13
13
14. 14
14
15. 15
15
16. 16
16
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 4565

# Number Grid Aim: The aim of this investigation is to formulate an algebraic equation that works out the product of multiplying diagonally opposite corners of a particular shape and finding the difference between the results

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Amanda Gaber

March 2006

Mathematics Coursework

Number Grid

Aim: The aim of this investigation is to formulate an algebraic equation that works out the product of multiplying diagonally opposite corners of a particular shape and finding the difference between the results.  I will start off by working this out on a 2x2 square in a 10 x 10 grid and then will investigate varying the widths and lengths of squares and rectangles.

Method: In order to simplify the process, the investigation has been divided into sections according to the size of squares in the grids.

2 x 2 Squares

To begin with, I used a 10 x 10 grid, looking at 2 x 2 squares:

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100

Then I took 2 x 2 squares from this grid and multiplied the opposing corners to calculate the difference between the two products.

 1 2 11 12

1 x 12 = 12

2 x 11 = 22

22 – 12 = 10

So the difference between the answers is 10. I then took another 2 x 2 box from the above 10 x 10 grid:

 47 48 57 58

47 x 58 = 2726

48 x 57 = 2736

2736- 2726 = 10

The difference is 10 again.  Perhaps this means that because it is a 10 x 10 grid, that all the differences would be 10.  I would still like to further investigate this theory.

The grid below is once again a 2 x 2 box derived from the original 10 x 10 grid.

 89 90 99 100

89 x 100 = 8900

90 x 99 = 8910

8910 – 8900 = 10

This once again confirms what I stated; that the difference between the products of cross-multiplied boxes will always equal 10 in a 10 x 10 grid.

I would like to determine if this is definitely correct, so I am going to do it again twice.

 27 28 37 38

27 x 38 = 1026

28 x 37 = 1036

1036 – 1026 = 10.

 43 44 53 54

43 x 54 = 2322

44 x 53 = 2332

2332 – 2322 = 10.

Middle

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

242

243

244

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254

255

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

263

264

265

266

267

268

269

270

271

272

273

274

275

276

277

278

279

280

281

282

283

284

285

286

287

288

289

290

291

292

293

294

295

296

297

298

299

300

301

302

303

304

305

306

307

308

309

310

311

312

313

314

315

316

317

318

319

320

321

322

323

324

325

326

327

328

329

330

331

332

333

334

335

336

337

338

339

340

341

342

343

345

346

347

348

349

350

351

352

353

354

355

356

357

358

359

360

361

3620

As before, the highlighted boxes are the ones I am going to calculate, to see if the difference between the product of multiplying the opposite corners, equals the size of the grid.  In this case, I am looking for that number to be 19.

1. 1 x 21 = 21

2 x 20 = 40

40 – 21 = 19

1. 32 x 52 = 1664

33 x 51 = 1683

1683 – 1664 = 19

1. 177 x 197 = 34869

178 x 196 = 34888

34888 – 34869 = 19

1. 302 x 322 = 97244

303 x 321 = 97263

97263 – 97244 = 19

1. 305 x 325 = 99125

306x 324 = 99144

91444 – 99125 = 19

Once again, I can conclude that the difference between the cross multiplied products is the size of the grid; 19.

To confirm this, the number 19 has been inserted into the formula to prove that this is correct.

 n n + 1 n + g n + g + 1

n(n + g + 1) = n2 + ng + n

n + 1(n + g) = n2 + ng + n + g

[n2 + ng + n +g] – [n2 + ng + n ] = g

where g = 19;

n(n + 19 + 1) = n2 + 19n + n

n + 1(n + 19) = n2 + 19n + n + 19

[n2 + 19n + n +19] – [n2 + 19n + n] = 19

My prediction of what the difference would be was correct. So for any 2x2 square taken from any size grid, the difference will be the number of the grid size.

I can now work out the difference of any 2x2 square as long as I know the grid size.

5 x 5 grid        = Difference of 5

19 x 19 grid         = Difference of 19

100 x 100 grid         = Difference of 100

31 x 31 grid         = Difference of 31

58 x 58 grid         = Difference of 58

1000x1000 grid         = Difference of 1000

3 X 3 Squares

Having studied 2 x 2 boxes within different sized grids, I would like to study 3 x3 boxes within grids of varying sizes to see if there is an emerging pattern.

I have decided to look at an 8 x 8 grid first to see if there is a pattern.

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64

I am going to leave out all of the numbers in the middle of the 3 x 3 box and will concentrate on the four corners of this box.

Firstly, I need to work out the difference of the products for the highlighted 3 x 3 box.

26 x 44 = 1144

28 x 42 =1176

1176 – 1144 =32

From this, I can see that the difference is not the size of the grid (g).  However, I will formulate an expression to predict the size of the difference for any 3 x 3 box within an 8 x8 grid,

The first top left hand box is shown as ‘n’ and the size of the grid is still ‘g’.  The top right hand corner of the box is 2 more than the top left hand corner, so this is n+ 2.  The bottom left hand corner of the box is two rows down exactly, so this n + 2g and finally, the bottom right hand corner of the box is n + 2g + 2.

Therefore;

 n n + 2 n + 2g n + 2g+ 2

After multiplying the diagonal corners of the box, the algebraic formula is as follows:

(n )( n + 2g + 2) = n2 + 2ng + 2n

(n + 2)(n + 2g) = n2 + 2ng +2n + 4g

Then subtract either sides of the equation from each other to confirm what the difference is.

(n2 + 2ng +2n + 4g) – (n2 + 2ng + 2n) = 4g

This is accurate because the 8 x8 grid had a difference between the products of 32, which is equal to 4 x 8.  Therefore, I can confirm that, according to my calculations, the difference between the products of the diagonal corners is 4g.

I will now use a different 3 x 3 box within the same 8 x8 grid to see if this rule remains the same;

 6 7 8 14 15 16 22 23 24

Here, I will also multiply the corners only so:

6 x 24 = 144

8 x 22 = 176

176 – 144 = 32.

This proves that my prediction is correct.

I will now investigate if this formula for 3 x 3 boxes works in a different sized grid.

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

The box I have highlighted will be used to work out the product of the corners and the difference between them.

1 x 17 = 17

3 x 15 = 45

45 – 17 = 28.

This fits the pattern, as 4 x 7 is equal to 28, where 7 is the grid size.

4 X 4 Square

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
1. 4 x 31 = 124

1 x 34 = 34

124 – 34 = 90

1. 24 x 57 = 1368

27 x 54 = 1458

1458 – 1368 = 90

1. 61 x 94 = 5734

64 x 91 = 5824

5824 – 5734 = 90

1. 67 x 100 = 6700

70 x 97 = 6790

6790 – 6700 = 90

In a 10 x 10 grid, the difference between the diagonal corners of a 4 x 4 square is always 90.

2 x 3 Rectangle

As yet, I am unable to determine a general formula to predict the difference between multiplying the diagonals of a square or a rectangle in any sized grid.  I will therefore investigate the difference between the products of the diagonal corners of a rectangle.

I am going to begin with a 2 x 3 rectangle in a 10 x 10 grid.

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100

Conclusion

If the number in the top left hand corner is n then the following squares will be…

For a 2 x 3 rectangle when the first square is n the difference is:

 n n+2 n+G n+2+G

(n+2) (n+G) = n2 + nG + 2n + 2G

n (n+G+2) = n2 + nG + 2n

(n+2) (n+G) - n (n+G+2) =  2G

The algebraic expression for the difference of a 2 x 3 rectangle is 2G, the width of the grid multiplied by two.

For a 2x4 rectangle when the first square is n the difference is:

 n n+3 n+G n+3+G

(n+3) (n+G) = n2 + nG + 3n + 3G

n (n+G+3) = n2 + nG + 3n

(n+3) (n+G) - n (n+G+3) = 3G

The algebraic expression for the difference for this size of rectangle is 3G, the width of the grid multiplied by three.

From this information, I have been able to tabulate my results:

 L H nG 2 3 2 2 4 3 3 5 6

From the table above, it is apparent that between 2 x 3 and 2 x 4 rectangles, nincreases by 1. This could be due to the height increasing by 1. I think that the height is probably related in some way to the difference value.

Evaluation:

I have formulated the algebraic formula that can predict the difference for any sized rectangle or square for any sized grid.  Having investigated this observation, I can only ascertain that this is correct and that;

L – 1 x G (H -1)

Perhaps further investigations on different grid sizes would be suitable.  Also, given more time, I would have liked to look at different shapes in different sized grids and to determine a general formula for them. For example, I would like to know if the same formula fits a rhombus on a 10 x 10 grid.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

## Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is a well written piece of work with only a couple of minor errors. This piece of work shows a good application of some algebraic techniques. There are specific strengths and improvements suggested throughout.

Marked by teacher Cornelia Bruce 18/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences essays

1. ## opposite corners

5 star(s)

- (n2+44n) 160 I am now going to create a table displaying my results so far Square Opposite Corners 2 x 2 10 3 x 3 40 4 x 4 90 5 x 5 160 6 x 6 ???

2. ## Opposite Corners. In this coursework, to find a formula from a set of numbers ...

4 star(s)

34 35 36 37 44 45 46 47 54 55 56 57 64 65 66 67 In the 4 � 4 square: 34 � 67 = 2278 37 � 64 = 2368 The difference between the products is 90. 25 26 27 28 29 35 36 37 38 39 45

1. ## Number stairs

T=6x - 44 T= The total value of the 3-step stairs X= The bottom left hand corner stair number so in this case X=71 6x is the number of the squares in the 3-step stair 44 is the sum of all the algebra formula in the 3-step stair and they are: Total= X +(x+20)

2. ## GCSE Maths Sequences Coursework

I then went to look at the next stage in the sequence. I divided it up into sections the same way as the previous shape. This time I was able to divide it into 4 sections made up of 4 squares and 3 sections made up of 3 squares.

1. ## Opposite Corners Investigation

(X + 20) = X2 + 4X + 20X + 80 = X2 + 24X + 80 X (X + 24) = X2 + 24X = 80 X X + 5 X + 30 X + 35 (X + 5) (X + 30)

2. ## Number Grid Coursework

Testing My formula works as shown with the following, previously unused values: 1) Where a = 5 Difference = (a + 1)(a + 10) - a(a + 11) (5 + 1)(5 + 10) - 5(5 + 11) 6 x 15 - 5 x 16 90 - 80 10 2)

1. ## Number Grid Investigation.

In Mathematics, Algebra is designed to help solve certain types of problems; letters can be used to represent values, which are usually unknown. I will now attempt to prove my results algebraically. Let `N` represent the number in the top left of the square.

2. ## How many squares in a chessboard n x n

+ 9 + 4 + 1 = 16 + 9 + 4 + 1, which gives the total number of squares in this particular square. This result will be added to the next 5 x 5 square. This is 5 by 5 square plus previous sequence (16 + 9 + 4 + 1).

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to