• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 1826

# Open box. In this investigation, I will be investigating the maximum volume, which can be made from a certain size square piece of card, with different size sections cut from their corners. The types of cubes I will be using are all open topped boxes.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In this investigation, I will be investigating the maximum volume, which can be made from a certain size square piece of card, with different size sections cut from their corners. The types of cubes I will be using are all open topped boxes.

The size sections that I will be cutting from the square piece of card will all be the same size. The section sizes will go up to half of the original size of card. I will only go up to this size, because it is physically impossible to cut square sections, with sides over half the length of the original shape.

During this investigation, I will not account for the ‘tabs’, which would normally be needed to hold the box sides together.

Middle

0.5

0.5

3.0

3.0

4.500

0.6

0.6

2.8

2.8

4.704

0.7

0.7

2.6

2.6

4.732

0.8

0.8

2.4

2.4

4.608

0.9

0.9

2.2

2.2

4.356

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

4.000

1.1

1.1

1.8

1.8

3.564

1.2

1.2

1.6

1.6

3.072

1.3

1.3

1.4

1.4

2.548

1.4

1.4

1.2

1.2

2.016

1.5

1.5

1.0

1.0

1.500

1.6

1.6

0.8

0.8

1.024

1.7

1.7

0.6

0.6

0.612

1.8

1.8

0.4

0.4

0.288

1.9

1.9

0.2

0.2

0.076

2.0

5cm by 5cm, piece of square card

 Length of the section (cm) Height of the section (cm) Depth of the section (cm) Width of the section (cm) Volume of the cube (cm3) 0.1 0.1 4.8 4.8 2.304 0.2 0.2 4.6 4.6 4.232 0.3 0.3 4.4 4.4 5.808 0.4 0.4 4.2 4.2 7.056 0.5 0.5 4.0 4.0 8.000 0.6 0.6 3.8 3.8 8.664 0.7 0.7 3.6 3.6 9.072 0.8 0.8 3.4 3.4 9.248 0.9 0.9 3.2 3.2 9.216 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 9.000 1.1 1.1 2.8 2.8 8.624 1.2 1.2 2.6 2.6 8.112 1.3 1.3 2.4 2.4 7.488 1.4 1.4 2.2 2.2 6.776 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 6.000 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.8 5.184 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 4.352 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.4 3.528 1.9 1.9 1.2 1.2 2.736 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.000 2.1 2.1 0.8 0.8 1.344 2.2 2.2 0.6 0.6 0.792 2.3 2.3 0.4 0.4 0.368 2.4 2.4 0.2 0.2 0.096 2.5

6cm by 6cm, piece of square card

 Length of the section (cm) Height of the section (cm)

Conclusion

So if A = the size of the side I start with, and X = the size of the cut out, then my results can be described by the following equation:

X = 1/6A

To prove it further, I have decided to test my rule with one larger number, 100cm x 100cm. To test this equation, on the very large square gives the results below:

X = 1/6100

## X = 16.667 cm

VOL. = X ( A - 2X ) ( B - 2X )

= 16.667 ( 100 - 2 x 16.667 ) ( 100 - 2 x 16.667 )

= 16.667 ( 100 - 33.334 ) ( 100 - 33.334 )

= 16.667 x 66.666 x 66.666

= 74074.074 cm3

If I make X slightly bigger or smaller, then the volume should decrease. I will use X = 16.6, and X = 16.75.

Vol. = X ( A - 2X ) ( B - 2X )

= 16.6 ( 100 - 33.2 ) ( 100 - 33.2 )

= 16.6 x 66.8 x 66.8

= 74073.184

Vol. = X ( A - 2X ) ( B - 2X )

= 16.75 ( 100 - 33.5 ) ( 100 -33.5 )

= 16.75 x 66.5 x 66.5

= 74072.687

These are both smaller than my predicted value, and therefore my prediction is correct.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences essays

1. ## Opposite Corners Investigation

X (9(6-1) = (54 X 5) X (9 X 5) = 270 X 45 = 12150 9 54 279 324 54 X 279 = 15066 9 X 324 = 2916 Difference = 12150 My equation was right. Geometric Progressions There is a pattern for arithmetic progressions but what about geometric progressions?

2. ## Algebra Investigation - Grid Square and Cube Relationships

= n�+11nw-11n Stage B: Bottom left number x Top right number = (n+10w-10)(n+w-1) = n�+nw-n+10nw+10w�-10w-10n-10w+10 = n�+11nw-11n-20w+10w�+10 Stage B - Stage A: = [ n�+11nw-11n-20w+10w�+10] - (n�+11nw-11n) = 10w�-20w+10 The result of these calculations means that for any size square box, the difference should be easily calculated using the formula.

1. ## Step-stair Investigation.

+ (blank) g + (blank) How I solved the blanks is written below. 2 I investigated the step stair patterns and found another really helpful pattern. This is described below: X+4g+1 X+3g+1 X+3g+2 X+2g+1 X+2g+2 X+2g+3 X+g+1 X+g+2 X+g+3 X+g+4 X+1 X+2 X+3 X+4 X+5 The numbers outside the grid

2. ## I will take a 2x2 square on a 100 square grid and multiply the ...

1288 - 1248 = 40 DIFFERENCE = 40 Algebra I will assign a letter to the first number in the 3x3square, n. The right hand top corner will therefore be n+2 The left hand bottom corner will then be n+20 Carstens theorised sabkaurb's functionalism .

1. ## I will try to find a formula linking P (perimeter), D (dots enclosed) and ...

15 17 0 15 16 Triangles (T=16): P= D= T= 10cm 4 16 12cm 3 16 14cm 2 16 16cm 1 16 18cm 0 16 20 triangles (T=20): P= D= T= 12 5 20 14 4 20 16 3 20 18 2 20 20 1 20 22 0 20 It

2. ## Investigate the size of the cut out square, from any square sheet of card, ...

In the graph on the next page, you can see that it is curved. This is because that the volumes increase until it reaches the highest point, and then it starts to decline after 5cm by 5cm. I could also use my graphs for comparison as well.

1. ## I am doing an investigation into how get the maximum volume from a cuboid ...

I now went through the numbers 3.31cm to 3.36cm. I found the turning point at 3.33cm, it was 592.592cm^3. Now I have found out the maximum size for the cut out square I will experiment by changing the size of the square.

2. ## To do this I am going to be drawing different size grids, including 2,3,4,5,6,7, ...

the difference in the products of opposite corners for 2by2 squares is, 2 3 4 5 6 You can see that the difference in the products of the opposite corners is the same as the size of the grids. From this I predict that the difference of a 2by2 square in a 7 grid will be 7.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to