• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  27. 27
    27
  28. 28
    28
  29. 29
    29
  30. 30
    30
  31. 31
    31
  32. 32
    32
  33. 33
    33
  34. 34
    34
  35. 35
    35
  36. 36
    36
  37. 37
    37
  38. 38
    38
  39. 39
    39
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 2282

Opposite Corners Investigation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

David Jacques

Opposite Corners Investigation

This investigation is about finding the difference between the products of the opposite corner numbers in a number square. There are three variables which I can change whilst doing my investigation, they are the size of the grid, the shape of the grid and the numbers inside the grid. I am going to start by looking only at number squares with consecutive numbers

Consecutive Numbers

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

4 x 13 = 52

      1 x 16 = 16

Difference = 36

image00.png

0

3

12

15

0 x 15 = 0

       3 x 12 = 36

Difference = 36

-2

1

10

13

1 x 10 =  10  

      -2 x 13 = -26

Difference =  36

The difference seems to be the same, for these 3 the answer is 36 but this isn’t proof.

Let X stand for the start number which can be any real number.

X

X + 3

X + 12

X + 15

(X + 3) (X + 12) = X2 + 3X + 12X + 36

                            = X2 + 15X + 36

X (X + 15)          = X2 + 15X

Difference          = 36

So, the difference between the products of the opposite corner numbers in a 4x4 number square is 36. What about a 3x3 number square?

X

X + 2

X + 6

X + 8

(X + 2) (X + 6) = X2 + 2X + 6X +12

                          = X2 + 8X +12

         X (X + 8) = X2 + 8X

        Difference =  12

So, the difference between the products of the opposite corner numbers in a 3x3 number square is 10. What about Other squares?

X

This investigation does not work with a square size of 1x1, as the square does not have four corners.

X

X + 1

X + 2

X + 3

(X + 1)

...read more.

Middle

64

69

19 x 64 = 1216

14 x 69 =  966

             = 250

My equation is right.

I Have noticed that the height of the outer square is irrelevant in the formula so this formula will also work for squares inside rectangles.

Rectangles

I have worked out the formula in number squares, but what about number rectangles?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

10 x 31 = 310

 1 x 40 = 40image35.png

            = 270

I’m now going to see whether the corners have any algebraic relation to each other.

image38.pngimage36.pngimage37.png

image39.pngimage40.png

1

10

21image41.pngimage28.png

30

image46.pngimage47.pngimage42.pngimage43.pngimage44.png

image48.png

image49.pngimage37.png

image50.pngimage51.png

1

10

41image52.pngimage53.png

50

image56.pngimage47.pngimage39.pngimage55.png

image57.pngimage58.png

image59.png

image60.png

X

X+(N-1)

image59.png

X+(M-1)Nimage49.pngimage61.png

X+(N-1) + (M-1)N

(X + (N–1)) ((X + (M–1)N) =X2 + XN(M-1) + X(N-1) + N(N-1)(M-1)image59.png

     X(X + (N - 1) + (M-1)N)= X2+ XN(M-1) + X(N-1)

                      Difference = N(N-1)(M-1)

Check

Using my equation I predict that for a rectangles sized 7x5 the difference will be

N(N-1)(M-1) = 7(7-1)(5-1) = 7 X 6 X 4 = 168.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

      7 X 29 = 203

      1 X 35 =   35

Difference = 168

My equation is correct

Rectangles inside rectangles

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

image62.png

image37.png

image63.pngimage64.pngimage65.png

47image66.pngimage67.png

50

62

65

67

72

97

102

91

95

106

110

26

28

41

43

X

X+(C-1)

X+A(D-1)

X+(C-1)+A(D-1)

(X + (C-1)) (X + A(D-1)) = X2 + XA(D-1) + X(C-1) + A(D-1)(C-1)

(X) (X + (C-1) + A(D-1)) = X2 + XA(D-1) + X(C-1)

                        Difference = A(D-1)(C-1)

Check

Using my equation, I predict that inside a 6x5 rectangle a 3x2 inner rectangle will have a difference of 6(2-1)(3-1) = 6 x 1 x 2 = 12.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

8

10

14

16

     10 x 14 = 140

       8 x 16 = 128

Difference = 12

My equation is correct.

Looking at these results I have realised that squares are actually rectangles where the length = width so I am now not going to treat squares and rectangles differently.

Patterns

What happens when I change the pattern inside a rectangle?

Arithmetic Progressions

2

8

18

24

2

6

14

18

3

12

39

48

To get the answer to the equation, you have to multiply the rectangle going up in consecutive numbers by the arithmetic number you are using this is because when you use consecutive numbers, you are actually going up in arithmetic progression of 1.

X

X+S(N-1)

X+SN(N-1)

X+(SN(N-1)+S(N-1))

(X + S(N-1)) (X + SN(M-1) = X2 + XSN(M-1) + XS(N-1) + SN(M-1) S(N-1)

 X (X + (SN(M-1) + S(N-1) = X2 + XSN(M-1) + XS(N-1)

                           Difference = SN(M-1) S(N-1)

Check

For a table 6x6 with an arithmetic progression of nine I predict that the difference will be (9X6(6-1)) X (9(6-1) = (54 X 5) X (9 X 5) = 270 X 45 = 12150

9

54

279

324

...read more.

Conclusion

X2 + SAX(D-1) + SX(C-1) + SA(D-1)S(C-1)

 (X) (X + S(C-1) + SA(D-1)) = X2 + SAX(D-1) + SX(C-1)

                            Difference = SA(D-1)S(C-1)

Check

Using my formula I predict that for a 6x4 outer grid with an arithmetic progression of 5 the difference of the product of the opposite corners inside an inner grid of 3x2 will equal 5x6(2-1)5(3-1) = 30(1)5(2) = 30 x 10 = 300.

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

15

25

45

55

     25 x 45 = 1125

     15 x 55 =   825

Difference = 300

My equation is correct.

Geometric progressions in grids within grids

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

242

243

244

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254

255

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

263

264

265

266

267

268

269

270

271

272

273

274

275

276

277

278

279

280

281

282

283

284

285

286

287

288

289

290

291

292

293

294

295

296

297

298

299

2100

After doing my original study on geometric progressions I have realised that it is easier to keep the numbers in powers form.

212

213

222

223

244

245

246

247

254

255

256

257

272

273

274

275

276

282

283

284

285

286

292

293

294

295

296

NX

NX+(C-1)

NX+A(D-1)

NX+(C-1)+A(D-1)

NX + (C-1) X NX + A(D-1) = N2X + (C-1) + A(D-1)

NX X NX + (C-1) + A(D-1) = N2X + (C-1) + A(D-1)

Difference = 0

Check

For a 7x3 outer grid a 4x2 inner grid with a geometric progression of 7 will be 0.

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

710

711

712

713

714

715

716

717

718

719

720

721

73

74

75

76

710

711

712

713

    76 + 710 = 716

    73 + 713 = 716

Difference = 0

My equation is correct.

Spirals

What would happen if I spiralled into the centre?

1

2

3

4

5

6

20

21

22

23

24

7

19

32

33

34

25

8

18

31

36

35

26

9

17

30

29

28

27

10

16

15

14

13

12

11

1

9

19

11

8

10

14

12

X

X+(N-1)

X+2(N-1)+(M-1)

X+(N-1)+(M-1)

(X+(N-1)) (X+2(N-1)+(M-1) = X2+X(N-1)+ X(M-1)+2X(N-1) +2(N-1)2+(M-1)(N-1)

             (X) (X+(N-1)+(M-1) = X2+X(N-1)+X(M-1)

                              Difference = 2X(N-1)+2(N-1)2+(M-1)(N-1)

Check

For a 7x5 rectangle with a starting number of 3 I predict that the difference will be

2x3(7-1)+2(7-1)2+(5-1)(7-1) = 6(6)+2(6)2+(4)(6) = 36+2(36)+24 = 36+72+24 = 132.

3

9

19

13

      9 x 19 = 171

       3 x 13 = 39

Difference = 132

My equation is correct.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Opposite Corners. In this coursework, to find a formula from a set of numbers ...

    4 star(s)

    374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 In a 3�3 square (below) obtained from a 20 by 20 grid, the difference is: 230 231 232 250 251 252 270 271

  2. Marked by a teacher

    I am going to investigate by taking a square shape of numbers from a ...

    4 star(s)

    * 3x4x10 * =120 this formula works. Conclusion I found a new formula which will find the difference of the two opposing corners on a 10x10 grid for any rectangle shape. Now that I have worked out a quadratic formula for a rectangle on a 10x10 grid, I can investigate further to see if I can work out a formula for an 8x8 number grid.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Opposite Corners

    4 star(s)

    I think that any 4*4 square would have a difference of 90. To prove this I will use algebra. z-number in the top left corner z z+1 z+2 z+3 z(z+33)=z�+33z z+10z+11 z+12z+13 (z+3)(z+30)=z�+33z+90 z+20z+21 z+22z+23 (z�+33z+90)-(z�+33z)=90 z+30z+31 z+32z+33 Difference = 90 This proves that with any 4*4 square, the opposite

  2. Marked by a teacher

    I am going to investigate taking a square of numbers from a grid, multiplying ...

    3 star(s)

    x x+(n-1) - - Now we need to look at the expressions in the bottom left corner of the squares. 2x2 bottom left corner = x + g 3x3 bottom left corner = x + 2g 4x4 bottom left corner = x + 3g When we found out the top

  1. Number Grids Investigation Coursework

    I can also see that they are all square numbers multiplied by 10 and that, when the difference between the numbers in the grid is 2, they go up in every other square number multiplied by 10. My previous formula was D = w (m - 1) (n - 1)

  2. Number Grid Investigation.

    So, if for example we were given a 9 X 6 square from a 14 wide grid the calculation would be: 14(9-1)(6-1) Changing the pattern of numbers within the grid: I have only tried this approach in a grid with a width of 10. (Z X (multiple number�)) X (n-1)(d-1)

  1. Investigation of diagonal difference.

    to that of square grids when looking at grids with the same length. To check that my assumptions are correct I will calculate the diagonal difference of a 4 x 4 cutout numerically and then by using my formula. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

  2. Algebra Investigation - Grid Square and Cube Relationships

    It is possible to use the 2x2, 3 and 4 rectangles above to find the overall, constant formula for any 2xw rectangle on a 10x10 grid, by implementing the formulae below to find a general calculation and grid rectangle. It is additionally possible to see that the numbers that are added to n (mainly in the corners of the grids)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work