Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Document length: 4124 words

Statistics Is there a correlation between 100m times and shot-put distances compared to BMI (Body Mass Index)?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE Statistics Coursework Introduction Project Title: Is there a correlation between 100m times and shot-put distances compared to BMI (Body Mass Index)? I plan to investigate the following: 1. Whether BMI ranking affects performance in 100m and shot put. I predict that people with a higher BMI, will perform better than people with low BMI in shot put, however I also predict that people with a low BMI will be perform better in 100m than shot put compared to people with a high BMI. 2. Is there a similar correlation between females and males in 100m and shot put performance? If so any trends I predict that boys will have an overall better performance at both events compared to females. Background Research Definition of BMI: BMI or Body Mass Index is a mathematical formula to access relative body weight. It is a ratio of height and weight, which determines approximately how much body fat a person has on their body. This can be used as a guide to weight levels and can establish whether a person is obese or not as it correlates highly with body fat. It is calculated as weight in kilograms, divided by the square of the height in meters or kg/m2 for short. I will use me as an example of how BMI is calculated; 65/1.72 = 22.49 The sections of weight categories are as follows : Underweight = <18.5 Normal weight = 18.5-24.9 Overweight = 25-29.9 Obesity = BMI of 30 or greater Data Collection In order to answer any of the above questions, I must first look at samples of select data from year 10 students. I will conduct the above in the following way: 1 I will take my sample from year 10 students, with 50% boys and 50% girls. I will be taking from only year 10 students as age will not be taken into account. ...read more.

Middle

The data is clustered around certain areas and are in a flat line so to speak, which indicates that BMI has no real evident effect on performance. There is, however, a clear outlier in the female 100m times, again could be down to numerous factors - errors in recording, laziness etc. In order to see if there were any similarities between BMI and shot-put and 100m times, and between genders, it is clear that I would need to produce a box and whiskers graph. Male Female These two box and whisker graphs show 100m times and shot-put distances against BMI for both male and female gender types. For male BMI, we see that the median is slightly skewed to the left, and that the range is very wide on the right, making it fairly unsymmetrical. This is down to an outlier, most likely from an error in calculating BMI. However, for male shot-put, we can see an almost perfect symmetrical result, if only for the median which is once again skewed to the left slightly. The 100m results are similar to the BMI in terms of ranges and position of median, as the median is skewed to left, and the whiskers or ranges of the 100m are longer on the right, making it unsymmetrical. The long whiskers of the 100m data could be down to errors again or laziness. However for females, the BMI is much more symmetrical compared to males, and the median is much more central, with the whiskers quite close to the box indicating a close spread of data. The same can be said for shot-put distances, however the range is much more narrower than that of males, yet the median is skewed to the left as it is in males, which could indicate positive correlation between the two. However for 100m times, the data is very wide spread, with the right whisker extending much further out then what should be. ...read more.

Conclusion

1.85 20.71585099 8.9 13.91 high 77.7 1.79 24.25017946 8.1 13.29 high 59.5 1.74 19.65253006 7.1 13.64 low 65 1.84 19.1989603 7.76 15.45 low 95 1.77 30.32334259 7.37 20.15 high 106.4 1.83 31.7716265 6.95 26 high 80.9 1.73 27.03063918 6.88 17.23 high 78 1.82 23.54788069 8.5 13.6 high 45 1.63 16.93703188 6.8 13.6 low 37 1.5 16.44444444 5.6 13.8 low 57 1.64 21.19274242 10.4 11.9 High 57 1.67 20.43816558 6.25 15.38 High 64 1.78 20.19946976 9.3 11.3 Low 40 1.56 16.4365549 5.15 13.84 Low 55 1.69 19.25702882 9.2 12.54 Low 68 1.8 20.98765432 7.59 14.46 High 64 1.69 22.40817899 6.7 13.45 High Average 21.36176291 7.67375 14.59583333 Lower quart 18.92136707 6.84 13.195 Upper quart 23.52024569 8.725 14.83 Median 20.31881767 7.48 13.82 Standard deviation 4.010422062 1.360608971 2.951622318 Standard deviation Above mean 25.37218497 9.034358971 17.54745565 Standard deviation Below mean 17.35134085 6.313141029 11.64421102 Female Kilograms Height BMI Shot-put 100m time High/low BMI 51.8 1.57 21.01505132 4.4 26.53 High 55.9 1.61 21.56552602 6.2 18.24 High 33.2 1.51 14.56076488 4.27 21.48 Low 58.6 1.68 20.76247166 3 19.07 High 38.2 1.62 14.55570797 5.05 13.1 Low 36.4 1.58 14.58099664 5.35 18.45 Low 43.2 1.55 17.98126951 5 16.54 Low 60.9 1.74 20.11494253 5.2 20.15 High 48 1.61 18.5178041 5.2 17.54 Low 57 1.61 21.98989237 5.3 17.51 High 60 1.72 20.2812331 4.4 17.55 High 65 1.65 23.87511478 5.1 17.83 High 65 1.69 22.75830678 7.5 13.87 High 65 1.72 21.97133586 6.71 18.24 High 50 1.63 18.81892431 2.2 47.83 Low 50 1.6 19.53125 4.1 18.21 Low 68 1.68 24.09297052 4.1 20 High 49 1.68 17.36111111 4.3 18.54 Low 52 1.58 20.82999519 3.3 20.2 High 67 1.68 23.73866213 4.1 16.03 High 50 1.6 19.53125 4.4 15.52 Low 53 1.7 18.33910035 4.2 15.03 Low 49 1.6 19.140625 3.5 14.77 Low 52 1.71 17.78324955 4.4 14.55 Low Average 19.73739815 4.636666667 19.0325 Lower quartile 18.76032385 4.1 15.775 Upper quartile 19.248861 5.2 19.535 Median 19.82309626 4.4 18.02 Standard deviation 2.71156419 1.122937616 6.6126295 Standard deviation Above mean 22.44896234 5.759604282 25.645129 Standard deviation Below mean 17.02583396 3.513729051 12.419871 ?? ?? ?? ?? Robert Hanson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Edexcel GCSE Statistics Coursework

    Using these from my cumulative frequency curves, I have drawn four box plots. Outliers are not present in every box plot drawn, except one where there is an extreme value which deviates significantly from the rest of the sample. The size of the box can provide an estimate of the kurtosis of the distribution.

  2. Liquid chromatography is a technique used to separate components of a mixture to isolate ...

    Symmetry values for the peaks tend to follow the same trend as efficiency- staying constant then dropping off at high volumes. This indicates that the peaks are becoming more asymmetric as the column is overloading. COLUMN 3: 100 ? 4.6mm column of Kromasil 5µ C18 A.

  1. Mayfield High Statistics Coursework

    shows me that nearly 75% of the female students are between 1.50 to 1.70 metres. It also shows me that the students are slightly tall for their age as there is a positive skew to the frequency. This could be because of the sample I have taken or it could be for the whole school.

  2. mayfield high statistics coursework

    0 TOTAL 20 980 Mean = Total Frequency Times Midpoint Divided by Total Frequency 980 Divided by 20 = 49 kg for BOYS GIRLS Weight (kg) Tally Frequency (f) Mid-point(x) fx 30?w<40 IIIII 5 35 140 40?w<50 IIIIIIII 8 45 360 50?w<60 IIIIII 6 55 330 60?w<70 I 1 65

  1. Mayfield High School

    result would be: Y = -0.0003x² + 0.1134x - 4.4287 Y = (-0.0003 x 112²) + (0.1134 x 112) - 4.4287 Y = -3.7632 + 12.7008 - 4.4287 Y = 4.5089 However, when the IQ is 112 the actual average Key Stage 2 result is 5; the quadratic equation provided an answer which was 0.4911 less.

  2. A hypothesis is the outline of the idea/ideas which I will be testing and ...

    Right -Handed 11 6 16 Left -Handed 1 3 4 Total 11 9 20 Probability Tree Diagram My variables are Male and Female and Left and Right Handed. M= MALE R= RIGHT F=FEMALE L= LEFT R = RM M L = ML R = FR F L = FL Calculations

  1. Maths Statistics Coursework - relationship between the weight and height

    more than the upper quartile (UQ) or 1.5 times the IQR less than the lower quartile (LQ). Any outlier is marked on the box and whisker diagram but the whisker extends only to the lowest and highest values that are not outliers.

  2. GCSE Maths Coursework: Statistics Project

    This bar chart shows that the modal class interval for weight is 50<w<60 kg for the year 10 girls. The bar chart shows that not many people weigh between 30<w<40 and 70<w<80, probably because these intervals are said to be underweight and overweight.

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.