• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 2098

The correlation between height and weight.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Harriet Walden.

Maths investigation: Mayfield High School.

Mayfield is a fictitious high school but the data presented is based on a real school.

The data is secondary and I am reliant on Edexcel for its validity. There are a total of 31941 datum points, because of such a huge database I am going to select only some points to develop a statistical investigation.

 I have chosen to investigate the correlation between height and weight.

 I will sort the data into what is relevant to my specific investigation and what is not. I will hide the irrelevant data, which is everything except the year group, gender, height and weight.

 I expect the lower years to be shorter and lighter on average than those in the higher years. After grouping the data into year groups I will assign each pupil a number. I will take 30 stratified samples from the whole school. I have chosen to use stratified sampling because each year group is represented proportionally to their occurrence within the whole school. This means that I the results I obtain should show accurately the general trend in height and correlation throughout each year group. Without the sampling being stratified I could end up 30 samples all from the higher end of the school with none of the lower school represented.

I will use the formula:      

...read more.

Middle

  The line of best fit confirms that there is a positive correlation, however there are a few outliners and I have ignored these when I drew my line of best fit so I could have a more accurate diagram. I did use include all the data in my calculation for the mean.

To achieve a more precise diagram I need to separate the random sample into two categories: male and female.

  I took 30 stratified samples for females, and then for males.

Below is the table that shows how I worked out the 30 samples using a similar formula to previously mentioned, except I had to discount any boys so the formula became:  number of girls in year               x number of the samples

                         Total number of girls in school

YEAR

NO. OF FEMALES

SAMPLE SIZE

ROUND FIGURE

RANDOM NO.FROM CALC.

7

131

131 / 579 x 30 = 6.78

7.00

103.00

23.00

19.00

60.00

77.00

71.00

79.00

8

125

125 / 579 X 30 = 6.48

7.00

129.00

213.00

254.00

222.00

138.00

178.00

143.00

9

143

143 / 579 X 30 = 7.41

7.00

299.00

398.00

389.00

330.00

263.00

280.00

366.00

10

94

94 / 579 X 30 = 4.87

5.00

441.00

426.00

474.00

449.00

421.00

11

86

86 / 579 X 30 = 4.46

4.00

529.00

570.00

558.00

541.00

From this table I drew another table to show the 30 female pupils whose numbers were produced by the calculator.

From the results on the table I plotted another scatter graph to show the correlation between height and weight in females. This scatter graph shows a more precise representation of heights and weights, as it is gender specific. The reason for this is that females are generally shorter and lighter than males. This will be shown later.

...read more.

Conclusion

 These points are labelled on my cumulative frequency graph as follows:

Lower Frequency Q1

Median Q2

Upper quartile Q3

By taking the quartiles and median that I found from my cumulative frequency curve I could plot a box and whisker diagram. From this you can clearly see that the both the lower and upper quartile, and the median on the males diagram is higher than that of the females showing that males are taller on average. The range of the females is larger than the boys although both upper ends of the range are 180cm. This shows that some girls are as tall as boys are, but this may be due to results being to the extremes as the quartile range is lower than the boys.

 From this investigation I have concluded that there is a positive correlation between height and weight, in both males and females. By developing my results and plotting scatter graphs and working out the gradient of the line of best fit I could show that boys were generally heavier and taller than girls. This matched my initial predictions and was confirmed when I plotted a cumulative frequency curve and box and whisker diagram. The box and whisker plot showed the medians and ranges, which helped compare the genders more effectively. This confirmed that males were generally taller and heavier than females.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Height and Weight of Pupils

    The UQ for female's height and weight was 1.665m and 51.2kg. From this I can assume that my hypothesis is correct. I still believe that my hypothesis is correct but I can see how students can control there weight but not height.

  2. Conduct an investigation comparing height and weight from pupils in Mayfield School.

    Meaning the range of boys heights is more concentrated about the mean. So according to my data it is apparent that boys are more evenly developed in terms of height than girls. But this may be due to pure chance.

  1. Maths - Weight And Height Correlation

    From the table above I was able to create 2 dual bar charts 1 for height and the other for weight as you can see below. The chart above shows a sample of males and females taken from a sample of 20 (random sample)

  2. maths coursework-Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations

    The mode weight for girls is 50 kg. I can see from this that girls have a higher weight than boys. Height From the histogram for boys' height I can see that the modal interval is 160-170 and the mode height is 164 cm.

  1. Stratified sampling and Hypotheses - ...

    77 10.5 21.5 118 Blue M 178 70 11 24 125 Blue M 165 70 10 20.5 126 Blue M 185 57 10 21 127 Blue M 180 70 11 22 130 Blue M 150 57 7 24 159 Blue M 190 82 10 22.2 160 Blue M 174 60

  2. Mayfield High School

    4 4 4.00 9 14 Female 99 4 4 4 4.00 9 14 Female 101 4 4 4 4.00 9 14 Female 113 5 5 4 4.67 9 14 Female 120 5 5 5 5.00 9 14 Female 100 4 4 4 4.00 9 14 Female 101 4 4 4

  1. For this investigation I have four hypotheses, which are: 1) ...

    The problem with this method of sampling is that it is unrepresentative if there is a pattern in this list. I cannot take this chance as the data I am using is secondary data and may have a pattern that I don't know of in it.

  2. How the mass and height of the pupils differ from each other in different ...

    These are ridiculously out of the pattern and are therefore anomalies. I overcame this by sifting through the data and highlighting the anomalies to make sure I was aware of them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work