The table below shows the cut off measured to 2 decimal places and the half waypoints between the cut sizes. Looking at the table you should be able to see again the largest volume in bold, is with a cut out of 3.335cm. I can see by looking at this graph and also the table that I would need to look between 3.33 and 3.335cm to obtain the maximum volume.
This is the final table for a sheet of length 20cm, showing the maximum area with the cut out measured to 3 decimal places. As you can see from this table, the maximum volume is obtained when the cut out measures 3.333cm. If I wish to work out the proportion of the box that needs to be cut away to obtain the maximum area, I need to divide 3.333 by 20. In doing this I get an answer of 0.16665, or a proportion of 1/6. You can find a general formula allowing you to achieve maximum area by using algebraic expressions for the height length and width.
20 cm is the length and width of the square, therefore
20 = 2H + L
Rearranging this it becomes
L = 20 – 2H
The formula for the volume is
Width * Length * Height
Or
(20 - 2H) * (20 – 2H) * H
The maximum area it found when the cut out is 1/6, meaning that:
H = 20/6
If I substitute this into the equation for maximum volume then it will become
V = (L – 2L/6)(L – 2L/6) L/6
I multiply the 2 in each bracket with L/6, giving you
V = (L – 2L/6) (L – 2L/6) L/6
To multiply brackets out I’ll separate them, and write the 2nd bracket out twice.
V = L (L – 2L/6) – 2L/6 (L – 2L/6) L/6
Then complete multiplication leaving
³V = (L² - 2L²/6 – 2L²/6 – 4L²/36) L/6
Then I multiply the whole thing by L/6, which gives me
V = L³/6 – 2L³/36 – 2L³/36 + 4L³/216
I put the whole equation over a common denominator to help me with simplification, meaning the whole thing becomes over 216. This means that it becomes:
V = 4L³ + 36L³ - 12L³ - 12L³
216
This can be simplified so you end up with:
40L³ - 24L³
216
Which then cancels out to give you
16L³
216
You then divide the top and bottom by 8, which is a factor of both, and you will end up with:
2L³
27
Proving this equation to be correct I have listed my results below:
12x12
18x18
24x24
30x30
8x8
15x15
25x25
100x100
I am now going to continue my investigation by looking at the shape of rectangles. As there are too many combinations of lengths and widths of rectangles for me to possibly even begin to investigate I am going to investigate in the following manner. I shall begin with a width of 20cm, and a length of 40cm, this is a ratio of 1:2, the length being twice as long as the width. The square cut outs will rise in measurements of 1cm at a time, beginning with a cut out of 1 cm, and 9cm being the maximum for there to be a box left. I will then investigate various other ratios. I have again constructed a spreadsheet to assist with my workings out. Firstly I am looking at whole numbers, a beginning with a width of 20cm and a length of 40cm, and cut outs from 1 to 9cm.
Below are the results that I got:
You should be able to see from this table, and the graph I have drawn that that the largest volume achieved is 1536cm², and this is obtained when the amount cut off from the corners measures 4cm². I can also see that to make my results more accurate, to more decimal places, I next need to look between 4 and 5cm² cut offs.
As you can see my results from calculating the volume when the cut out area is measured to one decimal place. I have also drawn a graph to illustrate my results. From these results, where the largest volume of 1539.522cm³ is achieved with a cut off of 4.2cm², I see that I should look between 4.2 and 4.3cm as a cut off next to get even more accurate results which are measuring to 2 decimal places. Below are my results showing the size of the cut off calculated to 2 decimal places.
I am going to finally calculate the size of the cut off to 3 decimal places for a very accurate result. The table above and my graph tell me that the largest volume will lie somewhere between the cut off sizes of 4.22 and 4.23cm, so I will finally look in between these numbers for the cut off size to achieve my most accurate results. Below is my final table of results, which shows the cut off measured to 3 decimal places. The largest volume is highlighted in bold. I have drawn one more graph to show these results easily. You should be able to see from this table, and from the graph that the largest volume I have obtained is 1539.600701cm³, and that this is got when the cut off area from each corner of the box is measuring 4.226cm.
When I divide the cut out which gives the maximum volume, 4.226 by 20 this gives me the proportion that should be cut off to give the maximum volume, which is 0.2113, almost a quarter.
The length of the rectangle is double the width (ratio 1:2) so length = 2L
Volume will be expressed as:
V = L x W x H
As square cut out is x.
Take it away from both sides of both length & width so it becomes
Length = 2L - 2x
Width = 2Lx
So the cut out is h = x
Expression for volume will be:
L * W * H
(2L - 2x) (L - 2x) * x
Multiplying it out becomes
(2L² - 2xL - 4xL + 4x ²) * x
Multiply X through and the equation will become
2L² (x) – 6xL (x) + 4x² (x)
So this can be
2L²X - 6X²L + 4X³
4X² - 6X²L + 2L²
I have fully worked out which cut off gives the maximum area with a ratio of 1:3, as I did above, but with a width of 20cm and a length of 60cm. I worked again to 3 decimal places. All of my results are shown below. I am not going to draw any further graphs, as they are all fairly similar.
When I divide the largest cut off, 4.515 by 20, this gives me the ratio that needs to be cut off each corner to achieve the largest volume. This is 0.2257, which is again almost a quarter. Next I fully worked out the cut off giving the largest volume when the width length ratio is 1:10. Again I calculated the ratio that needs to be cut off the card to create the box with the largest volume. This is 0.24345, which is close to ¼ again. The final volume I am going to work out is with a width: length ratio of 1:100.
I worked out the proportion that needs to be cut off the box to give maximum volume this was 0.24445, which is very close to ¼.
Ð stands for delta.
Firstly we should consider a graph of y = x² as shown below.
The line through X and Y has almost the correct gradient.
It’s gradient is
Increase in y-coordinate from X to Y
Increase in x-coordinate from X to Y
You have to find an expression for , which represents
the gradient of the graph at the point X.
So
y = x²
y + Ðy = (x + Ðx)(x +Ðx)
Multiply out brackets.
y+ Ðy = x² + x Ðx + x Ðx + (Ðx) ²
Add like terms together.
y + Ðy = x² + 2xÐx + (Ðx)²
Now here the x² at the end is y in terms of x.
Ðy = x² + 2xÐx + (Ðx) ² - x²
Then you divide by Ðx, which gives you
Ðy 2xÐx – (Ðx) ²
Ðx = Ðx
Ðy
Ðx = 2x + Ðx
Now because delta (Ð) is so tiny that it is insignificant, we forget all about it, which leaves us with
Ðy/Ðx = 2x = 0
I can use calculus to help me complete my calculations to solve the problem, for proof through exhaustion.
I have drawn a graph showing the proportions that I have worked out. I can see that they tend towards ¼. This is the amount that should be cut off each corner to give the maximum volume possible.