• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 3346


Extracts from this document...


THE STROOP EFFECT: FURTHER TESTS OF THE ATTENTION-CAPTURE HYPOTHESIS ABSTRACT Building on the work of Kahneman and Chajcek (1983) and MacLeod and Hodder (1998), this study examined the role of attention in the Stroop effect. A computer-controlled colour-word stimulus presentation and key-press response technique were used to study colour naming response times for dissimilar incongruent word pairs relative to identical incongruent word pairs, and response times for congruent-incongruent word pairs relative to congruent-congruent pairs and incongruent-incongruent pairs. The effect of word position was also investigated. It was found that a stimulus of two different incongruent words produced no more interference than a stimulus of two identical incongruent words and that congruent-incongruent word pairs produced more interference than congruent-congruent pairs but less than incongruent-incongruent pairs. The position of words in the pair had no significant effect. These results contradict the response competition hypothesis and provide further support for the attention-capture hypothesis of Kahneman and Chajcek (1983). However, the factors involved in allocation of attention remain unclear, and it is suggested that these be more thoroughly investigated. INTRODUCTION Presented with a stimulus varying on the two dimensions of word and colour, people seem incapable of ignoring the word dimension even when it is irrelevant to the task of naming the colour. This was first demonstrated by Stroop (1935): he gave subjects a list of words printed in different colour inks, and found that while incongruent colours did not interfere with word reading, incongruent words interfered significantly with naming colours, as indicated by longer response times for colour naming. ...read more.


The dependent variable in all conditions was the time taken to name the ink colour, measured in milliseconds. Subjects Subjects were 76 first year psychology students at Oxford Brookes University. No controls for visual acuity or colour blindness were applied. Data from one subject were excluded on the basis of an error rate of 25%. Data from 75 subjects remained for analysis. Materials Stimulus presentation and response were controlled by a computer system. The background of the computer screen was black; all instructions and fixation stimuli were presented in white. Stimulus materials consisted of four colour words - red, blue, yellow and green - presented in pairs, one above the other in the centre of the screen. Words were printed in these same four colours. Responses were made using a key-press technique. Red, blue, green and yellow stickers were placed over the numbers 8, 4, 6 and 2 on the computer's numeric key-pad. Procedure Subjects were tested over four days in groups of 18 - 20. The following display sequence was adopted for each trial: * a 'next trial' warning for 1 second * a blank screen for 250 ms. * a fixation stimulus (XXXXXX) for 250 ms. * a blank screen for 250 ms. * the word pair stimulus (displayed until response). Each subject experienced eight practice trials and sixty experimental trials: there were twelve trials for each of the five experimental conditions, presented in random order. ...read more.


and upheld by MacLeod and Hodder (1998). It seems that only one word of the pair is attended to and processed, and thus that, contrary to the assumptions of the automaticity and response competition accounts, reading on the Stroop task is not entirely involuntary and free of attentional demands: an initial stage of object discrimination appears to be involved. What factors might be involved in this object discrimination remain unclear, however. Whether the top word or bottom word was incongruent had no significant effect on response times, suggesting that word position is not a crucial factor in the allocation of attention. (It might, for example, have been supposed that the fact that we read from top to bottom could have some effect). This question is deserving of a more sustained examination. It has been briefly considered by Yee and Hunt (1991), who concluded that word length and the spatial allocation of attention were not important factors. A starting point for further investigation of such factors might be to repeat the present experiment but to analyse data on a within-individual level rather than averaging it across individuals. It is possible that, as Yee and Hunt claim, a study of individual differences may provide valuable information about the attentional mechanisms involved in the Stroop effect. In conclusion, the results of the present study provide further evidence against a response competition account of the Stroop effect, which argues that all words are involuntarily and automatically processed, and support for the theory that only one value on each dimension captures attention. However, the study offers no more information as to what influences attention capture, a question which merits further examination. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Comparing length of words in newspapers section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Comparing length of words in newspapers essays

  1. memory. This experiment is a replication of the 1973 study conducted by Gordon ...

    Using any memorization method you choose, memorize all six groups of words in sequential order; however, the groups of words do not need to be memorized in order. Here's an example: (poster 1) Poster 1 The first word of each list will be given.

  2. The aim of the experiment was to see if people's attention is affected by ...

    do not match, compared to the other condition where the words do match the colour. Null hypothesis: There will be no difference between the times taken for the participants reading the word lists if the ink and word do or do not match.

  1. Assesment of Reading Difficulties in Patient AM Following the Development of Vascular Dementia.

    BAL maintains the ability to name pictures from arrays indicating his attentional deficit arises after a stage of visual processing in which undifferentiated visual features are selected for further processing, therefore for BAL his attentional deficit is specific to reading.

  2. Aim: having been presented with some data, to come up with a hypothesis and ...

    added on, so I added 15% onto the 100% giving me 115%, I then divided this by 100 to take it out of a percentage. Finally I multiply it by the size of the angle (34) it then gave me the final result (39.1).

  1. Investigating the Levels of Processing Theory

    than from the list with associated questions related to the case of the word (shallow processing).' Method Design and Overview My investigation will be an experiment. I chose the independent groups design because there is an element of surprise in the task - the participants do not know beforehand that

  2. A dual-task study designed to permit inferences about cognitive processes

    and two different modes of responses (manual and verbal) are used. Studies carried out by Posner and Boies (1971) (cited by Edgar. G. 2002) suggested that participants had limited resources to process and make a response to two things simultaneously if both the tasks required a manual response (in this case the right hand clicking a button and the left hand clicking a button)

  1. Is color naming a controlled process or an automatic process?Experiment

    Consequently, the strength between the networks is the primary factor that decides which of the two processes is stronger. If two pathways are active simultaneously and the pathway leading to the naming color of the word is weaker, then interference results.

  2. Investigation into the effects of levels of processing.

    to long-term memory (LTM), includes that suggested by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968). They stated that there were three memory stores, the sensory, STM and LTM stores. This was called the Multi-store Model. However, there were some problems with this model.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work