• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 3353

There will be a positive correlation between height and weight.The spread of boys' height will be larger than the spread of girls' height

Extracts from this document...


Mohamed Hassan                student number: 20042512


Mathematics Data Handling Coursework


For my investigation I am using data from a simulated school called Mayfield High School. This is a mixed secondary school with 1183 people, split into 604 boys and 579 girls. There are five-year groups, from 7 to 11. This contains many different records, including, first name, surname, height, weight, age (decimal, years and months), month of birth, sex, hand, favourite sport subject and TV program, hours of TV, IQ, distance between home and school, means of travel to school, and Ks2 and Ks3 results. I have chosen to investigate the relationship between height and weight, because it is quite probable that they influence each other. Here are my hypotheses, which are all related to height, weight or both. : -

  1. There will be a positive correlation between height and weight.
  2. The spread of boys’ height will be larger than the spread of girls’ height.
  3. The average boys’ weight will be larger than the average girls’ weight.
  4. The older someone is the better the correlation is between height and weight.

I will collect data on the height and weight of 60 pupils. I will also collect the data on their age and gender. To make sure my data sample is fair and unbiased. I will do a random stratified sample, which means I will have an amount of records from each gender year group, in correlation to their percentage of the school size.

I will investigate these hypotheses by drawing an assortment of graphs and diagrams, and making several calculations.

Any data, which seems implausible, such as a height less than 1m, or larger than 2.2m, or a weight less than 20kg, or more than 90kg, I will discount, and randomly choose another pupil of the same year and gender. I will now explain my hypotheses in more detail.


...read more.






The cumulative frequency graph showed me that the boys and the girls both had quite a small inter quartile range (IQR), because the gradient was quite steep for the central 50% of the y axis. The boys’ lower quartile was 1.55 metres and their upper quartile was 1.7 metres, meaning there was an IQR of 0.15 metres. The lower quartile of the girl’s data was 1.545 metres and the upper quartile was 1.68 metres, meaning there was an IQR of 0.135 metres. So the boys inter quartile range was larger than the girl’s inter quartile range, proving my hypothesis correct.

But, the minimum girls height was 1.2, and the maximum was 1.8, giving a range of 0.6, whereas the minimum boys height was 1.41 and the maximum boys height was 1.91, giving a range of 0.5, which is 0.1m lower than the girls, meaning that my hypothesis is incorrect, and the spread of the girls height is actually larger than the spread of the boys height. To make the minimum, maximum, IQR, and range data easier to understand, I have drawn box and whisker diagrams for the girls and boys heights on the same axis.

I will now investigate the standard deviation of the girls and boys height, which will be another indication as to whether the girls’ or the boys’ data has a larger spread. Standard deviation is the square root of the mean of the square of the deviation from the mean. To do this I will need to find the mean height, and subtract it from the mid class value for each group. The equation for standard deviation is  

Here are the standard deviation calculations









These calculations show that the girls’ standard deviation is larger than the boys’ standard deviation, indicating that there is a higher spread of height for girls than for boys.

...read more.



I think my project went well, and I have fulfilled my aims, to prove correct or incorrect my four hypotheses. But although my sample was large enough to come to a reasonable conclusion, as to whether my hypotheses were correct or incorrect, for my results to have been more foolproof, I think I should have had a larger sample, perhaps 100 pupils altogether, with 50 of either sex. For example I only had 8 pupils in year 11, whilst having 14 pupils in year7 and 8. Eight is quite a low number of data pints to plot a graph with, so to make my results more conclusive, I need more pupils. Because I need a stratified sample, to keep my pupil sample fair, the only way I can get more pupils in the higher year is to increase my total sample. So this was one of my limitations, that I did not have a big another sample to provide full proof results. I don’t think there was any bias in my results, because my sample was random, so there can’t have been any bias. I think my plan was very effective, because I went through it in order, and completed all of my graphs and calculations that I needed. To further my work, I could investigate other things which effect height and weight such as whether the pupil was left handed or right handed, and their IQ. One of my other limitations was grouping my data, because I did it with my data grouped, which meant my answer was only an estimate. So to improve my project, I could have done standard deviation for the height data, with the data ungrouped. So If I did the calculations with ungrouped data, my results would be more accurate.

©Mohamed Hassan


...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Height and Weight of Pupils

    Hypothesis 2 * Year 11 males will be taller and heavier than year 11 females. The median of yr 11 males weight was 57kg and females was 54.8kg. This suggests that males are heavier than females. This agrees with my hypothesis.

  2. A hypothesis is the outline of the idea/ideas which I will be testing and ...

    Modal Weight Stem and Leaf Diagram Boys weight Stem Leaf Frequency 3 4 5 2 8 4 4 3 0 9 1 5 6 7 7 5 6 0 3 9 7 1 6 6 4 0 2 3 7 0 8 0 Key 3 / 4 = 34 kg

  1. Determine the relationship between the range of the jump achieved by the ski jumper ...

    Actual Range -1- (m) Actual Range -2- (m) Actual Range -3- (m) Average Range (m) Velocity (m/s) Time of flight (s) Predicted Range (m) (without RKE) Predicted Range (m) (With RKE) 0.031 0.164 0.165 0.166 0.165 0.779 0.280 0.219 0.185 0.069 0.205 0.206 0.203 0.205 1.163 0.280 0.326 0.275 0.109

  2. Maths Statistics Coursework - relationship between the weight and height

    I am planning to do the calculations in a variety of ways. I will be calculating the averages by using a calculator using the statistical functions on it. I will be using Microsoft Excel software to help me to calculate the product-moment correlation coefficient (PMCC)

  1. Investigation on the shape and size of limpets on a sheltered rocky shore called ...

    Also I would follow one technique of measuring each limpet. To make sure I was at the right height on a shore I would not use an optical level, but instead a different technique called cross staffing.

  2. Statistics GCSE Coursework. Height and weight of pupils. The sampling method I am ...

    affects the gain in weight: Year Line of best fit equation Weight gain per 0.1m gained in height 7 y=-1.162+29.4315x 2.94315kg 9 y=-11.4998+38.515x 3.8515kg 11 y=-70.2834+74.1581x 7.41581kg The correlation coefficients support the results I obtained from the testing of my line of regression , proving that as height increases weight also increases, supporting my hypothesis.

  1. I am going to find out the year 10 male average student at Weavers ...

    have been because of different amount of fat to muscle proportion in different people. Conclusion Hypothesis 1: Right Hypothesis 2: Wrong Hypothesis 3: Wrong Hypothesis 4: Right So overall I was half and half, wrong and right. The modal hair colours in both years were brown, and the least common

  2. Investigating the relationship between the height and arm span of year 10 pupils and ...

    To do this I press the following keys: 2nd Function / Shift Random = population + round to nearest integer. 33 Boys 001 > 066 27 Girls 067 >121 15, 21, 58, 19, 10, 44, 48, 9, 48, 9, 40, 2, 62, 61, 42, 46, 5, 23, 31, 24, 4,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work