• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To find out if there is a correlation between height and foot length using Fathom.

Extracts from this document...



I was given some data for 60 pupils in the school, with their height, foot length and gender. Firstly, I decided to compare this data by putting this data onto a graph and see if there is a correlation between height and foot length. I think that taller people will have bigger feet, which will be my hypotheses.


My hypothesis is that taller people have bigger feet.


To find out if there is a correlation between height and foot length using Fathom.


When you square root 0.69 you know to take the positive value, not the negative value, because the line has a positive gradient.

A scatter graph to show the correlation between height and foot lengthimage00.png

The graph measures r, the strength of the linear relationship between height and the length of foot. If all the points lie very close to the line, I expect the value of r2 to be close to 1. If r2= 1 all the products lie on the straight line.


This circle shows a few of the anomalies on the graph. The height is very big but the foot size is not. I can see this because the points are far away from the line of best fit.

The graph shows a positive correlation, which means there is a positive gradient.

...read more.


Refining my Hypothesis

I wanted to see if r would increase if I calculated the product moment correlation through gender. I will make a scatter graph for girls first and then a graph for boys. I think there will be a closer link between height and foot length by separating the genders.

A Scatter Graph for Males Only



I can see that there are not many anomalies on this graph, but the two that are circled show that there are a few boys who are taller than predicted and a few that are shorter than predicted. E.g. ‘a boy has a height of about 180cm, and foot length of about 24cm’, which means the boy is 30cm taller than predicted. I can see that there is a strong correlation between height and foot length for males only. A short boy will most likely have small feet. The value for the product moment correlation coefficient is higher than that for mixed gender, which proves my hypothesis was correct.

A Scatter Graph to show the foot lengths for females.


There are many more anomalies in this graph than in the male one, which implies that the coefficient is lower than expected, when I had expected the coefficient to be higher for both male and female, but it is only true for male.

...read more.


Boys (cm)        

Min Value:         15

LQ:        20

Median:          23

UQ:                 25

Max Value:  29

IQR:                  5

Range:          14

Girls (cm)

Min Value:         15

LQ:             20

Median:         23

UQ:                 24

Max Value:  25.5

IQR:                 4

Range:         10.5

From the above results, I can see that the median foot length for boys was 23 cm which also applies to the median foot length for girls (23 cm). This does not show that the boys and girls have got the same size feet because there may be one girl who has very big feet, or one boy who has very small feet or vice versa, bringing the median down or up. However, in this data, my hypothesis that boys will have bigger feet is not accurate.

The interquartile range for girls was 4 cm, whereas it was 5 cm for the boys. This shows a larger range for the males, which may be caused by a few individuals with anomalous results. These anomalous results may be caused by some boys suddenly growing, i.e. their foot length and height will increase.


My investigation could have been improved by taking out any anomalies in the graphs, and looking at how this would affect the results and the value of r.

I also could have used another source e.g. the Internet, to look at other examples of data for pupils’ heights and foot lengths, and compare them with the data I had.

Overall, I think the data was fairly accurate and there were not as many anomalies as expected.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Biology coursework is to find the different variations in our science class.

    This has totally nothing to do with genetics. Analysis of graph 6 - Hair colour By looking at the graph we can relate the hair colour to the eye colour. There is a relationship between the two because as said earlier, eye colour depends on the family's ethnic background and which allele is more dominant.

  2. we can see if there is any correlation between a person's height and weight ...

    that 0-1.60 m is a more popular range for females than males, but for males the range 1.60-1.70 m, is more popular than females. On the other hand 1.70-1.80 m is a more popular height range than it is for males.

  1. Data Handling - Height and Foot Length

    22 41 139 21 42 153 22 49 147 23 50 160 24 66 144 20 68 140 23 76 141 19 78 161 23 81 161 24 87 165 25 93 145 23 98 150 25 101 138 20 102 145 23 104 159 24 109 150 22 115

  2. For this investigation I have four hypotheses, which are: 1) ...

    22.2% of 100 males are 22 males and 22.2% of 80 females are 18. These are the amount of data I am going to use from each population and if both are added the amount to 40 which is the amount of sample data I wanted (22 males + 18 females = 40 males and females).

  1. How the mass and height of the pupils differ from each other in different ...

    These are ridiculously out of the pattern and are therefore anomalies. I overcame this by sifting through the data and highlighting the anomalies to make sure I was aware of them.

  2. Statistics Is there a correlation between 100m times and shot-put distances compared to BMI ...

    Is there a similar correlation between females and males in 100m and shot put performance? If so any trends 1 I will again be using a sample of 24 males and females; however, I will examine the data separately, and compare the two through means of scatter graphs and box and whisker diagrams.

  1. The hypotheses I have to find out are the following:Boys are taller than girls ...

    Male 24.86395196 7 Cohen Neil 7 1.55 38 Male 15.81685744 7 Dawson James 20 1.43 33 Male 16.13770845 7 Gwerm Matthew 16 1.62 50 Male 19.05197378 7 Hughes Anthony 4.5 1.44 42 Male 20.25462963 7 Khan Jamal 13 1.63 60 Male 22.58270917 7 Madden Ben 10 1.47 47 Male 21.75019668

  2. Hypothesis"The taller you are, the bigger is your foot length". I think my hypothesis ...

    I will also draw the regression line of my sample where one can estimate values of variable given values of the other if we know one of them. Collecting, Processing and representing the data Preliminary- Is my data reliable? I used the data from Census at School Data Selector for

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work