Analyse and compare the effectiveness of the techniques used by the film makers in the creation of the trailers for the films 'Armageddon' and 'Deep Impact'.

Authors Avatar

‘Armageddon’ and ‘Deep Impact’                                                                 03/04/2003

Analyse and compare the effectiveness of the techniques used by the film makers in the creation of the trailers for the films ‘Armageddon’ and ‘Deep Impact’

This is essay is about the deference in two movie trailers which are ‘Deep Impact’ and ‘Armageddon’ these are both science fiction/action films I will also be looking into the different types of sounds and music used and how this reflects the image.

Both trailers are quite long but ‘Deep Impact’ is the shortest lasting around 30 – 45 seconds, the trailer gives away a lot of the plot. From the trailer I am going to describe what I think would have happened in the film.  There is a comet found to be heading towards the earth, they build large bunkers under the earth were they can keep one million people alive.  They found two hundred thousand people with higher ranking jobs to go into the bunker first they then hold a lottery to see who the other eight hundred thousand are.  At the end of the film the comet does not hit and all the people although very shocked survive.

Join now!

The second film ‘Armageddon’ goes on for about 45 – 60 seconds this trailer also gives a lot of the plot away virtually all of it, ‘Armageddon’ is based on the same storyline as ‘Deep Impact’ but they stop the comet in a different way but they still survive.

Both these trailers are to detailed to leave any unanswered questions but ‘Deep Impact’ leaves more suspense.

‘Armageddon’ starts of with comedy these makes the film less tense but than suddenly the mood changes apart from the minor comedy at the start both trailers are serious throughout.  

...

This is a preview of the whole essay