• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should public figures expect a right to personal privacy? If so, how much privacy should they reasonably expect to enjoy?

Extracts from this document...


Should public figures expect a right to personal privacy? If so, how much privacy should they reasonably expect to enjoy? Privacy is "an individuals right to be let alone" (Gordon: 163). Everyone views privacy differently and where one person might regard some thing as very private, another may not see it in the same light. Therefore, when in comes to reporting on a public figure, it could be fair to say that if the facts are retrieved legitimately, then it is not an invasion of privacy. This means that as long as the Journalists means are moral and legal, then it should cause no harm to others.Public figures are constantly in the limelight. Some say that this is a price they pay for being celebrities or highly rated recognisable figures. However, increasingly the issue of privacy has been raised and it would seem that some Journalists go too far in order to get the latest gossip or scandal. The death of Princess Diana brought home to the public something that many successful actors have known for years: the stress of being a "public figure". Celebrities and public figures have to deal with constant exposure and coverage which can be annoying, embarrassing, or worse. ...read more.


They are voluntary public people and therefore maybe scrutinised, but the papers should do so in an "accurate and fair context" (Reuss: 165). Campbell's case can also be used here to show that although a Celebrity and in the public eye, Naomi chose to keep her addiction and treatment secret. I feel that this was her every right as she is not some one who is in control of important decisions that will effect the public, e.g. an MP or countries leader. It is wrong to take photographs that have been obtained without permission, for example through trespassing on private property and stolen photographs just for public entertainment. Subjects should surely know if photographs are being taken and therefore give their permission. Fair enough the press cannot always advertise when they are observing people in such cases of having long lens cameras from off shore but if they are using these types of cameras, then surely they are doing something deceitful. They should be only allowed to take such pictures if their actions can be justified by their subjects actions causing harm to others. Publication is wrong in a variety of circumstances. In many circumstances publication of photographs often follows on from a pattern of harassment of a figure. ...read more.


Archard agrees that revealing politicians "sexual peccadilloes" (Archard: 85) can effectively display his hypocrisy and unsuitability for high office. This shows a high concern for public interest as it will prevent the public from being misled by showing officials as corrupt and dishonest. Therefore, if the exposure of a private matter serves a public interest then an invasion of privacy could be justified. Ultimately, there must be a line when it comes to invading ones privacy, especially in an illegitimate way. "Privacy has to do with keeping personal information non-public or undisclosed" (Archard: 83). Peoples views on privacy differs greatly and where one person may be happy to disclose certain information, another might be embarrassed. Therefore, we must only disclose private matters when they cause harm to others. Celebrities must expect some invasion of privacy in being famous but it should not cross a line. I believe that only when it causes harm to others need it be made public. For example, although it was not our right to know about ex-Presidents Clinton sexual liaisons, it was our right to know that he had lied under oath. Therefore, when celebrities do commit adultery or use drugs, they must be aware that their actions might lead to other consequences that will involve all information coming out. They deserve as much privacy as an every day person in most cases but not when it comes to causing harm to others. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Narrative section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Narrative essays

  1. The mass media has played a major role in structuring public perceptions of crime ...

    I will also be adding my personal contact details such as my name, email address and my tutor class so that if anybody has a problem with the questionnaire they can come straight to me. Lastly I will be making sure that the precipitant is aware that the questionnaire will

  2. John Keane (1991) suggested,

    This maybe considered as power and influence, but if The Sun has so many readers, maybe it is just agreeing with the public and not exerting any power or influence. News Corporation also own 20th century Fox, which advertise all of their films in other news Corporation interests.

  1. 'How is the recent broadcasting of the BBC documentary 'The Secret Policeman' relevant to ...

    If the media's hegemonic reports and editorials in the 1980's were classed as a barely disguised belief in White supremacy, The Secret Policeman strangely that that attitude to Blacks is as strong today as ever it was then. "I'm a firm believer that Paki's create racism."6 "Most Asians carry knives."7

  2. who is 2 blame

    Essential elements of our own identity, and the identities we assume other people to have, come from concepts of gender - what does it mean to be a boy or a girl? Many objects, not just humans, are represented by the media as being particularly masculine or feminine - particularly

  1. Is the ideology of media blame really justified in present day society?

    This, I feel only strengthens the desire to watch the television programme or film. The great Psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud once said that '...We want what we don't have, and we have what we don't want...' a good example of this can been seen within and surrounding the film 'The Exorcist'.

  2. The President and the Media - Bill Clinton and George W. Bush's First Three ...

    Furthermore he argues that early successes can forecast later ones while early failures will be negative for the future of the president (Pfiffner 1996). John Maggs and James A. Barnes, however, claim that the First 100 Days is just a myth and they show based on historical evidence.

  1. This research sought to examine the relationship between television news portrayals of African Americans ...

    In contrast, when the need results from an intentional act on the part of the person, the need is seen as illegitimate (Schwartz & Fleishman, 1978). Legitimacy of need is evoked in studies of altruism by presenting study participants with a scenario depicting a need and the circumstances which have produced it.

  2. "News may be true but it is not the truth, and reporter and officials ...

    Advertisers are a strong influence, even on a paper's content, because without advertising revenue the newspapers could not print. This verges on the extent that the news becomes a commodity to meet the demands of different market players. It has been claimed, "the media grew out of gossip and propaganda."7

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work