• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should public figures expect a right to personal privacy? If so, how much privacy should they reasonably expect to enjoy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should public figures expect a right to personal privacy? If so, how much privacy should they reasonably expect to enjoy? Privacy is "an individuals right to be let alone" (Gordon: 163). Everyone views privacy differently and where one person might regard some thing as very private, another may not see it in the same light. Therefore, when in comes to reporting on a public figure, it could be fair to say that if the facts are retrieved legitimately, then it is not an invasion of privacy. This means that as long as the Journalists means are moral and legal, then it should cause no harm to others.Public figures are constantly in the limelight. Some say that this is a price they pay for being celebrities or highly rated recognisable figures. However, increasingly the issue of privacy has been raised and it would seem that some Journalists go too far in order to get the latest gossip or scandal. The death of Princess Diana brought home to the public something that many successful actors have known for years: the stress of being a "public figure". Celebrities and public figures have to deal with constant exposure and coverage which can be annoying, embarrassing, or worse. ...read more.

Middle

They are voluntary public people and therefore maybe scrutinised, but the papers should do so in an "accurate and fair context" (Reuss: 165). Campbell's case can also be used here to show that although a Celebrity and in the public eye, Naomi chose to keep her addiction and treatment secret. I feel that this was her every right as she is not some one who is in control of important decisions that will effect the public, e.g. an MP or countries leader. It is wrong to take photographs that have been obtained without permission, for example through trespassing on private property and stolen photographs just for public entertainment. Subjects should surely know if photographs are being taken and therefore give their permission. Fair enough the press cannot always advertise when they are observing people in such cases of having long lens cameras from off shore but if they are using these types of cameras, then surely they are doing something deceitful. They should be only allowed to take such pictures if their actions can be justified by their subjects actions causing harm to others. Publication is wrong in a variety of circumstances. In many circumstances publication of photographs often follows on from a pattern of harassment of a figure. ...read more.

Conclusion

Archard agrees that revealing politicians "sexual peccadilloes" (Archard: 85) can effectively display his hypocrisy and unsuitability for high office. This shows a high concern for public interest as it will prevent the public from being misled by showing officials as corrupt and dishonest. Therefore, if the exposure of a private matter serves a public interest then an invasion of privacy could be justified. Ultimately, there must be a line when it comes to invading ones privacy, especially in an illegitimate way. "Privacy has to do with keeping personal information non-public or undisclosed" (Archard: 83). Peoples views on privacy differs greatly and where one person may be happy to disclose certain information, another might be embarrassed. Therefore, we must only disclose private matters when they cause harm to others. Celebrities must expect some invasion of privacy in being famous but it should not cross a line. I believe that only when it causes harm to others need it be made public. For example, although it was not our right to know about ex-Presidents Clinton sexual liaisons, it was our right to know that he had lied under oath. Therefore, when celebrities do commit adultery or use drugs, they must be aware that their actions might lead to other consequences that will involve all information coming out. They deserve as much privacy as an every day person in most cases but not when it comes to causing harm to others. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Narrative section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Narrative essays

  1. who is 2 blame

    selected, and what might the alternatives have been? * What frame of reference does the audience use when understanding the representation? Gender is perhaps the basic category we use for sorting human beings, and it is a key issue when discussing representation.

  2. The mass media has played a major role in structuring public perceptions of crime ...

    The mass media report what they consider to be newsworthy, but the new focus on issue uncovers hidden or borderline examples which themselves would not have been newsworthy except in as much as they confirm the "pattern". For a variety of reasons, what is not frightening and would help the

  1. Having viewed the footage and studied the coverage of 'Fight Night' in three different ...

    Big Brother then cleverly decided that whilst the housemates were locked up in the bedroom the two girls were to sneek back in with the food for the party, by this time the girls had plenty to say. Big Brother contestants had already made their way through 10 bottles of wine and were unable to control themselves.

  2. Introduction Communication Design

    According to reports, the underworld was making calls to the two filmmakers for oversees rights of their films "Veer-Zaara" and "Naach". Chopra himself seems far from rattled or scared. So, how did the story of underworld activities in Bollywood surface again?

  1. Is the ideology of media blame really justified in present day society?

    * TV7+ = for seven year olds. * Tv7fv = may include fantasy violence e.g. 'Power rangers' * TVG = general audience i.e. 'countdown' * TVPG = suggested parental guidance e.g. 'The Simpson's' * TV14 = strongly cautioned. * TVMA = mature audience only 17+ e.g. 'Sex and the city' The History of 'rating' television or film

  2. 'How is the recent broadcasting of the BBC documentary 'The Secret Policeman' relevant to ...

    Crimes involving Blacks were given disproportionate coverage that suggested a behavioural generalisation that would never be suggested of Whites. Stereotyping was not the only form of racism; more covertly the press would exclude or misconstrue statistics such as those that showed Blacks to be twice as likely to be out of work as their counterparts.

  1. "News may be true but it is not the truth, and reporter and officials ...

    Advertisers are a strong influence, even on a paper's content, because without advertising revenue the newspapers could not print. This verges on the extent that the news becomes a commodity to meet the demands of different market players. It has been claimed, "the media grew out of gossip and propaganda."7

  2. The President and the Media - Bill Clinton and George W. Bush's First Three ...

    Furthermore he argues that early successes can forecast later ones while early failures will be negative for the future of the president (Pfiffner 1996). John Maggs and James A. Barnes, however, claim that the First 100 Days is just a myth and they show based on historical evidence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work