Rees Curran                 PE Coursework

My Analysis of my classmates performance as an official



Referees are an integral part of football. Without them, the game, whether played by 5 a-side teams, Sunday morning park footballers or Premiership players would be very different to the one played by over 2 million people each week. To read the game as a referee, you must be one step ahead of play, anticipating the next move of the phase of play before it happens.
 This gives you more time to react, allowing you to become pro-active rather than re-active to situations that may occur.

There is now currently a nationwide shortage of referees. There are 33,000 referees in this country, covering the 40,000 games played each weekend. Every year 7,000 referees are both recruited and lost, through age, fitness and abuse, leaving a shortfall of 8,000. This means that 20 % of all games have no referee.

According to Chris Checketts, referee development officer at Bedford FA, the essential qualities of a good referee are "good communication, calmness, good fitness and an air of authority".

For this specific piece of coursework, I have been asked to analyse my classmate’s (Chris Owens) ability to officiate a 5 a-side-match. I will be observing him on the following 5 key areas:

  • His ability to deal with pressure
  • His knowledge of the game and the governing rules and regulations
  • His communication skills
  • His levels of observation
  • His consistency thorough-out the game


The observation took place during Thursday practical training session was held on the schools Astro Turf courts. My role is to analyse Chris’ skills in officiating whilst the PE teacher filmed the session. The other students will then watch the taped sessions back in the classroom after they have refereed a match and we will then all be asked to judge each person on their individual strengths and weaknesses.

Part A – Audit


Strengths and Weakness’
 

Ability to deal under pressure


The role of the referee is to control the game using the skills that are available to him. During the first game, Chris was asked to be the referee. Although obviously feeling quite anxious about his role, Chris stood up to the task admirably. He immediately took control and was determined in his approach. By remaining close to play, Chris was able to make well-informed decisions, which the players had no choice but to adhere too. He controlled the tempo of the game well and kept play flowing. Even though many of the players would complain a lot about the judgments given he stayed calm and all the decisions where fair and unbiased and ensured that the players were kept safe from injury. Chris remained consistent with his decisions throughout the first half, dealing successfully with pressure from both players and spectators and remained calm thorough-out.  Unfortunately, during the second half the pressure finally started to get to Chris and he started loosing control of the game and listening to the players more than making his own decisions. Chris also lost track of the time and the session ran over its allotted time on the pitch. This meant that other teams did not get to play.

 
Knowledge

In the games Chris showed great knowledge in his role as referee.  He was aware of rules governing fouls and illegal tackles and tried to control these from the start verbally without relying on the use of his cards. He warned players of the “foot high” rule and this maintained that the players remained free from injury. Chris used the “drop ball” method when ever possible due to the fact free kicks are hard to play on a 5 a side pitch. He also introduced a rule to ensure that players could not score a goal if they were positioned in the opposition’s area. This helped keep the game flowing and prevented goals galore being scored. This made sure both sides remained relatively happy because more play was held in the centre of the pitch. Chris’ weaknesses included limited knowledge on regulations governing throw-ins and goal kicks. This provided instances where there were arguments between players and Chris’ concentration and nervousness became evident.

Join now!

Communication

Communication is another tool in which we can anticipate play.
 During the session, I witnessed some effective verbal communication towards the players. Chris spoke loudly and clearly and easily commanded the attention of all the players bringing them under control. Chris also demonstrated an abundance of none verbal communication.  By using the stance of his body or gesturing with his arms and legs, he was able to convey directions clearly when needed.

Chris kept up with play, which allowed him to maintain verbal and non-verbal communication with the players involved in that specific ...

This is a preview of the whole essay