• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“Assess the reasonsfor and the success of the Liberal Welfare Reforms” (1906-14)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Assess the reasons for and the success of the Liberal Welfare Reforms" (1906-14) British politics' History Essay Following the unsuccessful electoral campaigns of 1890s the Liberals gradually began to accept the need for greater state intervention and more social reform. Following the 1906 electoral victory the Liberal party unintentionally set out to install a series of welfare reforms. According to the analysis of J. A. Hobson and L. T. Hobhouse the economic conditions in Britain caused inequality, inefficiency and the rise of radical pressure groups. In response to this 'New Liberalism' neglected the policy of laissez-fair and sought political and electoral co-operation from the Labour and Socialist intellectuals. Subsequently New Liberalism was constructed on the basis of state intervention and a gradual installation of a basic social service system, which increasingly worried the bourgeois section of society. Since George Dangerfield's influential study of the British society under the Liberal government, 'The Strange Death of Liberal England (1935)', many political historians produced coherent and successful attacks against New Liberalism. According to Dangerfield's interpretation the Liberal reforms of 1906-14 were rather limited if not doomed. Contrary to Daingerfield's criticism Peter Clarke's publication, 'Lancashire and the New Liberalism (1970)', emphasised the importance of the Liberal programme. According to Clarke the Liberal reforms, although meagre in essence, proved to be the first ever steps to modernise the infrastructure of the British society. ...read more.

Middle

As maintained by Murray both acts "gradually had an impact despite their opponents", who discredited the Liberal approach as being destructive by undermining the independence of the working class family. In spite of this it can thus be argued that the Liberal government took gradual steps to ensure that the disadvantaged section of society had access to basic education, medical care and free school meals, which arguably formed the foundation for a collective, welfare state and underlined the development of 'New Liberalism'. 'New Liberalism' was a radical, new attitude towards the state, which in many ways contradicted the classical approach of 'Gladstonian Liberalism'. Based on the conventional principles of laissez-faire and individualism 'Gladstonian Liberalism' dislocated the government from the economic affairs of the state. This meant that the role of the government had to be small, which as recalled by Potter "restricted the provision of limited social services." Contrary to this line of thought, many Liberals realised the need for more social reform especially to help the unemployed, the old and the sick. Influenced by the economist J. A. Hobson and the sociologist L. T. Hobhouse many government intellectuals accepted the fact that the Liberal party had to abandon the orthodox nature of 'Gladstonian Liberalism' in order to tackle the nationwide social problems. The introduction of Old Age Pension was an important component, which was part of the Liberal welfare package and the new line approach. ...read more.

Conclusion

Little was in order for the agricultural labourers who remained with unsustainable source of income. Between 1900 and 1914 the 'minimum wage standards' rose very little, and the Trade Unions were not impressed by the reforms, as they abandoned the somewhat drawn-out Liberal approach. Another disturbing fact was that in 1914 the percentage of army volunteers rejected as physically unfit was as high as it had been in 1900. However this as Lowe reinforces "was only to be expected". The sudden change made by the benefits of the 'new state aid' would have been unrealistic, there was bound to be a time lag. The deployment of criticism does not require much effort but it is important to remember that the Liberals had faced determined opposition from the Conservatives and sometimes from the right wing of the Liberal party itself. The danger of being perceived as socialists was ultimately there and the fact that many external groups still sustained the belief in individualism added to the pressure. In spite of this, the fact that the Liberals were willing to act upon the public needs should be granted recognition. Jo Grimond argues that "the Liberal reforms were so novel for the times they established all necessary basic principles and therefore as good as created the Welfare state." The vitally important point was that the government had laid the foundations for a welfare state, which Lloyd George and Churchill intended to build later. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    By this time it was clear that the sanctions for restricting UNITA's ability to sustain its forces were not working, and the UN launched an investigation into UNITA's sanctions' busting36. This external factor sought to tighten the belt around those supporting UNITA's illicit diamond trade by threatening to name and shame them.

  2. Critical Book Review - The Strange Death of Liberal England Dangerfield, G. (1966)

    More and more unions went out on strike; Railway workers, and Miners to name just two of the biggest unions to hold Industrial strike action. The Government, under Asquith was near breaking point and getting involved in too many individual disputes, yet they were at a loss as to what to do about it.

  1. 1. Why was 'a welfare state' introduced after the War (note here that the term ...

    Labour's universalistic strategy appealed to the people hungry for social change through jobs, better housing and free health care and education. While any coalition government might have been forced to accept the peoples' wishes it was Labour that took the initiative in assessing the political and social atmosphere at the time and pouncing with widespread social reforms.

  2. In detail describe the historical development of the welfare state since 1945 and how ...

    This enabled the government to manage big parts of the economy. High employment rates lasted until the 1970's, however, after 3 decades, in which time the welfare state became a fixed element in Britain, unemployment became rife, as did inflation, which caused people to believe that major social reform was in need.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Mixed Systems Additional Member System Lastly many newer systems, such as those recently adopted in Italy, New Zealand and Russia, use mixed systems, although with a variety of alternative designs. The Additional Member System used in Germany combines single member and party list constituencies.

  2. Critically evaluate/assess the achievements of Sergei Witte and their consequences for the social groups ...

    trial after that he announced that no law would become operative without the approval of the state Dumas; The revolution in 1905 created work unions but also People in professions and businesses joined together in a "union of unions" and set up a central committee to organize it called the St Petersburg Soviet.

  1. To what extent have the principles of the welfare state been eroded since 1979

    finance from the production of welfare state, competition in all services was escalated or/and introduced. Selectiveness soon haunted these services and critics still argue league tables etc are counter productive as failing services find it hard to pick up lost momentum (Modern schools being the main victim of this policy).

  2. 'How far had the British Government abandoned the policy of laissez-faire by 1914?'

    A welfare state did not fully exist yet and the system was still showing signs of laissez-faire. There were still various problems that did not allow laissez-faire to be fully abandoned. The liberal reforms did not create a full Welfare State, this was because of various reasons.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work