• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“The author of its own downfall” – Is this a fair verdict on the first Labour Government? Givereasons to support your answer.

Extracts from this document...


"The author of its own downfall" - Is this a fair verdict on the first Labour Government? Give reasons to support your answer The first Labour Government began in December 1923; by 1924, this Government had collapsed, There were many reasons for this downfall, and to assess the validity of the given statement it is necessary to investigate them. Some factors can be attributed to Labour itself, such as how they dealt with the issues that faced them, the internal pressures within the party, and MacDonald's leadership. However, it is essential to appreciate the obvious weaknesses of a minority government, and the effect of these on the party's demise. One of the major factors leading to the downfall of Labour were the internal pressures within the party, this was due mainly to the moderate policy line the party was forced to take, and the conflict this caused with trade union and left-wing members. The party was funded by, and had many members of, trade unions, this funding meant that the trade unions expected to be able to control the Government, and expected it to confront issues such as nationalisation. The trade union leaders were uncompromising and unrealistic, so there was great friction with the Labour party leaders. In addition, some left-wing party members wished to pursue unrealistic socialist policies, to deliberately engineer defeat, allowing Labour to rally support in the country in the next election for true radical social reform. ...read more.


Some historians would argue that by this stage he had lost all motivation to continue, he was tired with the continual struggle of trying to unite his own party, and deal with governmental issues, and wanted to leave office. This would explain his irrational decisions, although, they could just have been as a result of inexperience. MacDonald made a few serious mistakes and these were very damaging for the Labour party, there are several proposed theories as to why he made them, but it is possible that the pressure had become too much, and he wanted to leave power. It is important to remember that Labour were not completely ineffective as a party, they did have some successes both domestically and internationally. Generally, they were not particularly radical, and achieved little more than previous Governments. Domestically, they made a few changes, such as Wheatley's Housing Act, in which grants were given to local authorities to build council houses, (to relieve the housing shortages,) and the old age pension and unemployment benefits were increased. Also, more state education was provided. Although these things were good, they were undermined by the problems in the country. People expected Labour to be radically socialist, and make big changes, both members of the electorate, and Labour party members, were disappointed by how little was actually achieved. However, some historians would argue that since Labour needed to gain an image of respectability, more radical changes were impossible. ...read more.


As a minority government, Labour was weak, and so the many events, which led to increased association with Communism, were very damaging, undermining Labour's power and support. Labour had been unpopular from the very start, and this forced to take a moderate line in policies. This divided the Labour party. The struggle of trying to bring the party together, and keep the support of the trade unions, combined with the difficult domestic problems, would have been almost impossible for any political leader. Perhaps a stronger leader than MacDonald, faced with fewer problems within the party, might have just managed to survive this time by minimising fear of Communism and dealing more sensitively and diplomatically with events such as the Campbell case. However, MacDonald lacked the necessary experience, skills and strength as a leader, the pressures put on him were immense, he made several costly mistakes, which is not surprising considering the pressure he was under. In some respects, it could be argued that Labour brought about its own downfall, certainly, MacDonald could have dealt better with the situations he found himself in. However, as a minority government, in an unfortunate situation from the very start they were destined to fall, and it is unlikely that attempts by MacDonald would have done anything more than delay when the party fell. It was little more than an apprenticeship to power, and the Conservatives knew that Labour were not a great threat, and thus, tactically allowed them to have control, knowing that they would fall. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How effective were the social reforms of the Labour Government of 1945-1951 in dealing ...

    They were very more focused on replacing damaged and destroyed school buildings than tinkering with the education system. This appears to have been an oversight on their part because the bill didn't apply the ideals of equality of access and opportunity that influenced the Government's other legislation.

  2. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    His scathing wit made him a dreaded but respected debating opponent in the House. His opposition to the Boer War made Lloyd George very unpopular, albeit well known. Indeed, one public meeting at which he spoke even ended in riots and deaths.

  1. Was the Provisional Government fatally weakened from the first? Notes

    He argued that the Bolsheviks, having been behind the rising from the beginning, later tried to disclaim responsibility. The results of the unsuccessful July rising revealed a number of important facts: o The opposition forces were disunited o The Bolsheviks were still far from being the dominant revolutionary party o

  2. Assess Mao's domestic policies

    Severe activities took place, led by eager communist students proudly displaying their 'Red Guard' arm bands. As time went on, rumours were constantly circulating regarding Mao's health. It was questionable whether he was still a suitable leader for China if he was unable to make proper decisions.

  1. How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31?

    By modern economics, it is clear that reducing government expenditure decreases aggregate demand and therefore increases unemployment; however Snowdon actually believed the former. With unemployment, as mentioned earlier, Labour had no concrete policy, in fact the only real 'attempt' at a policy was to leave it alone and in the

  2. 'Asses the success of the Liberals from 1906-1914 in dealing with their domestic problems.'

    welfare of citizens, there were many Liberal legislations which could easily be viewed as their most successful achievements during this period. Regarding their dealings with poverty, early reforms concerning children such as the School Meals Act of 1906 and the 1907 Education Act seemed to have real benefits and meant

  1. DanielO’Connell – 1775 – 1847

    Most members of the political classes believed that it would be unwise to give full political rights to Roman Catholics when their loyalties were divided between allegiance to the British Crown and support for the spiritual supremacy of the Pope at Rome, especially as the latter still ruled as an independent sovereign in the papal territories.

  2. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    Before the end of the century their teachings, in a modified and impoverished form, had been transmuted into a base, violent and conservative nationalism. Nevertheless, in the beginning, Slavophilism was a genuine and fundamental criticism of the regime of Nick I; such was the richness (and confusion)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work