• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“The author of its own downfall” – Is this a fair verdict on the first Labour Government? Givereasons to support your answer.

Extracts from this document...


"The author of its own downfall" - Is this a fair verdict on the first Labour Government? Give reasons to support your answer The first Labour Government began in December 1923; by 1924, this Government had collapsed, There were many reasons for this downfall, and to assess the validity of the given statement it is necessary to investigate them. Some factors can be attributed to Labour itself, such as how they dealt with the issues that faced them, the internal pressures within the party, and MacDonald's leadership. However, it is essential to appreciate the obvious weaknesses of a minority government, and the effect of these on the party's demise. One of the major factors leading to the downfall of Labour were the internal pressures within the party, this was due mainly to the moderate policy line the party was forced to take, and the conflict this caused with trade union and left-wing members. The party was funded by, and had many members of, trade unions, this funding meant that the trade unions expected to be able to control the Government, and expected it to confront issues such as nationalisation. The trade union leaders were uncompromising and unrealistic, so there was great friction with the Labour party leaders. In addition, some left-wing party members wished to pursue unrealistic socialist policies, to deliberately engineer defeat, allowing Labour to rally support in the country in the next election for true radical social reform. ...read more.


Some historians would argue that by this stage he had lost all motivation to continue, he was tired with the continual struggle of trying to unite his own party, and deal with governmental issues, and wanted to leave office. This would explain his irrational decisions, although, they could just have been as a result of inexperience. MacDonald made a few serious mistakes and these were very damaging for the Labour party, there are several proposed theories as to why he made them, but it is possible that the pressure had become too much, and he wanted to leave power. It is important to remember that Labour were not completely ineffective as a party, they did have some successes both domestically and internationally. Generally, they were not particularly radical, and achieved little more than previous Governments. Domestically, they made a few changes, such as Wheatley's Housing Act, in which grants were given to local authorities to build council houses, (to relieve the housing shortages,) and the old age pension and unemployment benefits were increased. Also, more state education was provided. Although these things were good, they were undermined by the problems in the country. People expected Labour to be radically socialist, and make big changes, both members of the electorate, and Labour party members, were disappointed by how little was actually achieved. However, some historians would argue that since Labour needed to gain an image of respectability, more radical changes were impossible. ...read more.


As a minority government, Labour was weak, and so the many events, which led to increased association with Communism, were very damaging, undermining Labour's power and support. Labour had been unpopular from the very start, and this forced to take a moderate line in policies. This divided the Labour party. The struggle of trying to bring the party together, and keep the support of the trade unions, combined with the difficult domestic problems, would have been almost impossible for any political leader. Perhaps a stronger leader than MacDonald, faced with fewer problems within the party, might have just managed to survive this time by minimising fear of Communism and dealing more sensitively and diplomatically with events such as the Campbell case. However, MacDonald lacked the necessary experience, skills and strength as a leader, the pressures put on him were immense, he made several costly mistakes, which is not surprising considering the pressure he was under. In some respects, it could be argued that Labour brought about its own downfall, certainly, MacDonald could have dealt better with the situations he found himself in. However, as a minority government, in an unfortunate situation from the very start they were destined to fall, and it is unlikely that attempts by MacDonald would have done anything more than delay when the party fell. It was little more than an apprenticeship to power, and the Conservatives knew that Labour were not a great threat, and thus, tactically allowed them to have control, knowing that they would fall. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How effective were the social reforms of the Labour Government of 1945-1951 in dealing ...

    In 1944, the Wartime Coalition passed the Education Act. It raised the school leaving age from 14 to 15 and introduced secondary education without fees for the first time. An exam called the 11 plus designed to select the best students was brought it, with the most "able" students going to grammar schools, and the students who did less well going to Secondary Moderns.

  2. How far do Sources A-G support the view that Ramsay MacDonald deserves to be ...

    Seeming to want to incite revolution from above. As well as referring to those he is addressing as comrades. Source E on the other hand written in the "Beatrice Webb Diaries in 1926 this source is primary not of great use, it talks about the character of Ramsay Macdonald but

  1. DanielO’Connell – 1775 – 1847

    Most members of the political classes believed that it would be unwise to give full political rights to Roman Catholics when their loyalties were divided between allegiance to the British Crown and support for the spiritual supremacy of the Pope at Rome, especially as the latter still ruled as an independent sovereign in the papal territories.

  2. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    the capitalist system is inevitable, while Democratic Socialism argue for a more gradual approach using the existing democratic situation to gain power and then to transform gradually the state. Moreover, their aim is "to alter the balance of power in society to such an extent that the capitalist system ceases to exist".

  1. How successful was the 1945-51 labour government.

    Labour realised this was due to their balance of payments, and the supplies didn't equal the production. To combat this, the government set up the Ministry of Economic Affairs to be controlled by Cripps and also reshuffled the central government.

  2. How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31?

    The government further highlighted the problems in the relationship between elected politicians and the trade unions. This was due to the industrial disputes and the government had no guiding strategy in the interests of the whole Labour movement. When looking more specifically at domestic affairs, it is clear that Labour did not really achieve very much on the whole.

  1. Analyse the transition from 'Old' Labour to 'New' Labour.

    Attlee was replaced by Gaitskell, the youngest leader since 1894. A working group was appointed within the party to look at reasons for the defeat at the ballot boxes. The following report directed the party to target marginal constituencies and the modernisation of its party structure.

  2. What, if anything, is socialist about the Labour party?

    The danger is that one will either reduce socialism down to core essentials or simply give a historical narrative. Labours idea of socialism changed not only form old to new labour but from different stages of old labour. Before the representation of the peoples act labour was essentially a fringe party and as such had little responsibility except to itself.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work