• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

1970's forced migration of Ugandan Asians to the United Kingdom.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Madhav Manek 3M6 25th April 2003 A Migration Case Study Topic: 1970's forced migration of Ugandan Asians to the United Kingdom Idi Amin, the head of Uganda armed forces, came to power in February 1971 in a relatively bloodless coup d'�tat while the President of Uganda, President Milton, was attending a Commonwealth Leaders Conference in Singapore. Amin initially was a General in the British army. The initial feeling of great happiness and well being demonstrated that Obote's measure of popularity with the Asians in Uganda was low. Idi Amin's astounding ignorance of the rule of law and how to govern a nation and to enhance and improve the well being of his peoples came to light incrementally. Idi Amin for the first 18 months indicated that there was no problem with the Asian Community and there was no known conflict or public scandal that might have explained the bombshell he dropped on the 5th August 1972. On that day in 1972 the lives of all the people living in Uganda were radically changed some for the better others for the worse. ...read more.

Middle

But the resentment against Asians had been building up within Uganda's black majority. Idi Amin himself was black as you can see in the photograph below: The photograph on the left shows Amin in his Ugandan Army General uniform showing his high ranking to the people of Uganda and showing them who was in control. Amin hated Asians but one of the worst things he ever called them was "bloodsuckers" and accused them of milking the economy's wealth. At the time there were many Asians who were British passport holders. Around 50,000 of the 80,000 Asians that were told to leave were British passport holders. Amin said that he would be summoning the British High Commissioner in Kampala to ask him for their removal. The expulsion had taken Britain by surprise. General Amin overthrew Uganda's elected leader in a military-backed coup last year but the British authorities had regarded him as a man they could work with. Around 30,000 people came to the UK. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Government feared that so many refugees would be a huge drain on British state benefits and tried to persuade General Amin to phase their expulsion instead of giving them 90 days' notice to leave. But Sir Alec Douglas-Home, the Foreign Secretary, told the Cabinet that the Ugandan dictator was becomingly increasingly unpredictable and that there was "little prospect of establishing rational communication with him". Idi Amin wanted Africa for Africans. If he could not do this for the whole of Africa he at least wanted it for Uganda. This was possible at the time because he was in charge. He changed the lives of many Asians who lived in Uganda. At the time many if not all would have thought that their lives were ruined but nowadays the people living in Britain have decent jobs with decent pay. This is enough to keep their families going. Many people may be doing better here than they might've been doing in Uganda had the expulsion not taken place. In the long term I think that the Ugandan Asians migration has worked out for the better. The photograph above shows the first Asians arriving from Uganda at Stansted Airport. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Source A is two graphs one of pay rates during 1919 to 1924 and ...

    Therefore the source is unlikely to be completely wrong, but we cannot trust it completely. If it was written in the 1970s it is unlikely to be one sided or biased. 2. Source A tells us that during the First World War the miners had a high rate of pay

  2. What did the post-war consensus in British politics amount to? Why did it ...

    It would be wrong to assume that the Conservatives applauded from the sidelines, however, as Attlee's grand vision materialised. The battle against the creation of the NHS was the most prominent example of Conservative dissent. Yet the Conservatives, once in government after 1951, did not dismantle what Labour had built.

  1. J. S. Mill Despre Libertate

    �n acest stadiu doctrina respectiva �si manifesta puterea prin faptul ca nu mai �ngaduie nici unei convingeri proaspete si pline de viata s-o mai confrunte, ci, dat fiind ea �nsasi nu mai are nimic de spus nici mintii si nici inimii adeptilor ei, ram�ne ca o sentinela de paza mintilor

  2. Who Holds Power in the United Kingdom Today?

    Pluralism argues that power is dispersed and fragmented throughout every spere of society and as a result ensures that the state cannot accumulate too much power. Robert Dahl coined this theory as 'polyarchy', meaning the rule by many. Most importantly, pluralists maintain that the electoral system reinforces polyarchy by guaranteeing

  1. In what ways were the lives of South Africans changed by the policy of ...

    The Group areas act, enforced in 1950, gave the government the power to declare areas 'for whites only' and move blacks out, whether the wished to or not. This meant that the black South Africans had to move out of their homes and this was infuriating for them.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Meanwhile England and France were arguing with each other's behaviour, especially regarding Malta. As a result of this Ball doesn't allow the Bailiff Tommasi to enter Malta and become the new Grand Master as the Maltese didn't want him, thus the order couldn't take Malta.

  1. How Is Power Distributed In The United Kingdom?

    The Judiciary is the court system within the UK. Juries within courts are made up of Citizens picked at random. Whereas Judges are usually highly educated officials who are paid a salary as it is their job.

  2. The Drug Policy in the United States

    The reasons for the Controlled Substance Act vary but there is one basic way that the policy works, the basic idea behind it all is that "Laws against selling and possessing certain drugs reduce their use by reducing supply and demand for the drug" (Edgmand et al.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work