• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13

A Critical Evaluation of UK's ID Card schemeA Government's proposal to monitor its Citizens

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A Critical Evaluation of UK's ID Card scheme A Government's proposal to monitor its Citizens Machine Word Count: 2.168 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. AN OUTDATED TOOL FOR A NEW KIND OF WAR 3 3. THE ID CARD BILL 4 4. POLITICAL CONFLICT 4 5. THE CATALYIST FOR THE CARDS INTRODUCTION 5 5.1 THE TERRORIST THREAT 5 5.2 IDENTITY THEFT / CRIME 6 5.3 ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION 6 6. THE TECHNOLOGY ON THE CARD 6 7. OPPOSITION TO THE CARD 7 8. THE COST OF THE CARD'S INTRODUCTION 7 9. CONCLUSION AND RECCOMMENDATIONS 8 10. BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES 9 11. APPENDIX 10 1. INTRODUCTION This commissioned report aims to hopefully provide the reader with an up to date analysis of the UK Governments ongoing proposal to introduce a national ID card for all UK citizens, from the perspective an independent management consultant. The word 'hopefully' has been used rather optimistically, due to the ever evolving developments concerning this issue, which are changing and unfolding even as this report is being written. Therefore, any temporal inaccuracies regarding recent developments either not covered or addressed in this report from the date of its publication, would gratefully be acknowledged as being absent solely for this reason. The report will look at the ID card bill itself, the proposed data to be included on the card, the technology used to store and read that data, in addition to the costs involved for the country and importantly for the individual. The controversial issues of human rights and civil liberty violations associated with the introduction of the card will also be addressed, explained and attempted to be presented in an unbiased fashion throughout. 2. AND OUTDATED TOOL FOR A NEW KIND OF WAR? As a concept, the ID card is not a new one for UK citizens, although with all the controversy and differences of opinion regarding the current version's introduction, one could easily be excused for thinking that this is the first time such a scheme had been considered for implementation. ...read more.

Middle

These advances are highly efficient and effective. "Biometrics can provide a greater degree of security than traditional authentication methods". [11] It has been learned that a small handheld device used by Police officers will be used to perform these verification tests, crosschecking the biological identity via the National Identity database. However some quarters claim that the level of sophistication the proposed version of this system is not 100% reliable, the European Union points out that "All 10 fingers and thumbs are needed to ensure reliable identification, and reduce the number of false positives".[8] However it is unlikely that this state of the art version will be used in the UK due its high cost, and consequently a system which will only hold fingerprints will be used instead. 7. OPPOSITION TO THE CARD This most contentious of bills, has continued to divide the public, the politicians and a number of pressure groups alike "In response to a parliamentary question from MP Anne McIntosh, Home Office minister Beverley Hughes has confirmed that over 5,000 of the 7,000 responses to a public consultation on the issue were against the scheme." [5] Of the many groups that oppose the introduction of the card for a number of reasons, the Civil Liberties Group 'Liberty' appear to have the had loudest voice in highlighting the negative aspects of the card's introduction to the British people via the media. Shami Chakrabarti (Liberty's Director) states that "No positive vision of society was ever built upon compulsory identity cards" [9] and goes on to suggest that the disadvantages associated with the card, by far outweigh the benefits. Many of the opposing views are firmly centred around the suggestion that an ID card would be a violation of human rights, concerning an individual's fundamental right to walk freely, proudly and unchallenged within the UK, to have to carry and/or produce such a document in order to justify their status regardless of whether or not they have breeched UK law or not. ...read more.

Conclusion

* Ensuring that the public are kept fully in touch with additional information being added to the card SWOT ANALYSIS [C] Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats *Adoption of a state of the art secure system to combat and control crime , immigration and Terrorist Activity ----------------------------------------------- *.Ensuring the safety of UK Citizens is maintained through the implementation of the of the scheme ---------------------------------------------- * Excellent collaboration between the Government and the Police to ensure smooth running of the system --------------------------------------------- *Generation of government documents detailing required changes and amendments, on the identification of any problems with the system . *The possibility for terrorist networks to infiltrate the National Database -------------------------------- *The possibility for the refusal of the general Public to go along with the scheme -------------------------------- *Inadequate Policing to be able to enforce penalties -------------------------------- *Inadequate Policing to stop and check suspected criminals and unlawful illegal entrants *Future technology advancements could ensure a safer and more secure system. ------------------------------------- *The ability to be able to modify the system in order to sell a modified version to other countries ----------------------------------- *Possibility of providing a more tailored service to include additional information on the card ---------------------------------- *Withdrawal of supplier's equipment and after sales service/support could cripple the system. --------------------------------- * Unforeseen failure to renew any licences could affect the scheme (as above) --------------------------------- *Possibility of internal staff stealing vital personal information for criminal purposes. --------------------------------- *The possibility of civil liberty/ pressure groups lobbying parliament to overturn the bill, at huge cost post implementation STAGETIC TOOLKIT ANALYSIS TECNIQUES (ACKOWLEDGEMENTS) [A] Partially modified content (Original Table) taken from an example, and directly applied to the National ID Card Scheme URL ADDRESS: http://www.ucc.ie/quality/INTERNET/PESTAnalysis.pdf ELECTRONICALLY ACCESSED ON: 28/3/2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [B] Partially modified content (Original Table), taken from an example, and directly applied to National ID Card Scheme URL ADDRESS: http://www.wmin.ac.uk/page-5179 ELECTRONICALLY ACCESSED ON: 20/3/2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [C] Partially modified content (Original Table), taken from an example, and directly applied to the National ID Card Scheme URL ADDRESS: http://www.ggu.edu/university_library/library_departments/administration/swot_analysis_planning_the_new_university_library ELECTRONICALLY ACCESSED ON: 2/4/2005 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Define and discuss an autocratic system of government - While most essays are likely ...

    But in essence, autocracy is invested in the interests of the countries' ruler and not of those who are being ruled. The design of this top-down model displays how such dictatorship is being used to direct all the activities of the state in to being concentrated into the hands of

  2. The debate over immigration and French identity is one of the most controversial questions ...

    Although immigrant crime was not immune for assassinations, there is a profound distinction between the high profile crimes wich immigrants are mostly associated with and the administrative infringments they are most often convicted for. Nevertheless, these moderating elements hardly ever reached the french public, who were convinced that french society was suffering a sanitary and moral contamination.(schor)

  1. The problem of illegal immigration in America.

    America - according to a study conducted by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). (Illegal Immigration.... Finds). "it is the first and most detailed look at costs of illegal immigration ever done," says Bob Dane, Director of communications at FAIR.

  2. The Uk policy making process.

    Again, astute lobbyists will certainly target the members of these committees and make sure to keep them updated about relevant issues. Civil Service I want to say a little about the Civil Service, because it is here that much of the detailed thinking about government policy is conducted.

  1. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    The UN has more powers under Chapter VII, but such involvement requires a level of commitment on the part of major players in the UN which is rarely seen, and in the case of military middle powers such as Pakistan and India, the use of brute force is never really an option.

  2. Nationalism as applied to business

    jointly organized a Genomics Policy Executive Course, from January 20 - 23rd, 2003, at Kumarakom in Kerala, India. This 4-day course was conducted by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in collaboration with the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics and was sponsored by Genome Canada, the International Development Research Centre, and the Confederation of Indian Industry.

  1. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    What is are Institutions? * Government * Parliament * Judiciary * Executive * Legislative * Monarchy * Parliament THE UK DOESN'T HAVE A CONSTITUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Constitutions can be * Written/Unwritten * Flexible/Inflexible * Relates to the ease in which a constitution can be changed.

  2. Section 1 of this report provides an introduction, which deals with the issue of ...

    were they in danger in their home country which means that a move to the UK would improve their quality of life or are they simply using the UK as an easy ride for benefits that include free health care, housing and child benefits that are not available in their

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work