• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A new democracy will face many difficulties in deciding its new Governmental structure.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The presidential model of government exists in a republic, where all the branches of government are separate.1 It is based on the premise that the power sharing bodies are clearly separated from one another in order that one may not exercise extraordinary powers over any other. The best example of this is the United States where the three branches of government; the Judiciary, the Legislature, and the Executive all have reserved powers and all can keep a check on the actions of any other. In this case the executive is elected completely separately that from any other branch of government, which is in contrast to a parliamentary system of government when the executive is drawn directly from the legislature; such as in Britain. The Presidential system works by making the process of legislation difficult and specifically needs approval by different branches of government. For example, for legislation to be passed in the United States, a Congressman, (Not the president) must propose the legislation; then it must be voted on in both houses; it must then go to committee stage in each house; it must further have the amended versions of this legislation passed by both houses; and only then can it be put in front of the President to sign. He can then veto the legislation or pass it; if he decides to veto it, Congress, if it has big enough majorities in both houses, can bypass the President and the legislation becomes law. In all this time, the Supreme Court, i.e. the Judiciary, can stop any piece of legislation as being unconstitutional. ...read more.

Middle

One problem which is normally glossed over is that the President is a 'winner take all contest', i.e. there is no ability to split the executive like there is Congress. The office therefore cannot become a coalition, because in a Parliamentary system when a party wins on a slim majority, it must rely on others, who the public would also see as fit to run the country to come to policy decisions collectively. Thus, a President, can in effect be in control of his reserved powers, (such as the power to grant pardons) without constraint, which can be worrying to certain members or groups in society. The parliamentary system would have to be sensitive to the greater plethora of views which the house holds in order to make certain decisions otherwise it will not get a majority and thus will be liable to a vote of no confidence. What this can however prevent is the ability for extremists to get into power. In most Parliamentary systems, the electoral system is a Proportional Representation one in which the vote more naturally reflects minorities in society. This can lead to extremist parties getting into Parliament and then being able to steer legislation to unfair or even racist ends. This touches on another problem the Presidential system suffers from. It is very difficult to remove the President from office. In the United States, the President has to be formally impeached by the House of Representatives, which requires a two-thirds majority of its members. ...read more.

Conclusion

to the Government, thus the President must rely on their support and especially their funding in a way that is not experienced in Parliamentary systems. It can therefore be argued that the expense spared in the bureaucracy means that the Government must source other areas of capital and thus loses some of its democracy in letting un-elected officials to have a say in legislation. In conclusion, a new democracy will face many difficulties in deciding its new Governmental structure, and a lot will depend on the previous administration and especially the history of the country.8 A Presidential system, although with its stable leadership and its greater democratic nature, is susceptible to outside influences such as big pressure groups and the inability to remove the leadership provide serious issues for the public to consider. Whereas in a Parliamentary system, personnel are easily moved around and the passage of legislation is clearly much easier to get through in times of crisis; although, like in the UK, a second chamber can sometimes not provide a good enough separation of powers and thus may lead to an over-powerful Prime Minister. What is important is consider the previous history, and in a country where authoritarian leaders have characterised its past, a Presidential system may not be so wise, whereas a country which has had a lot of ineffective coalitions through semi-democracies, may see a single head of state as preferable. 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_system 2 P. 270 Hague and Harrop Comparative Government and Politics 3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_system#Parliament_versus_Congress 4 http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=lame%20duck 5 http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/gw1.html 6 P.273 Hague and Harrop Comparative Government and Politics 7 http://.cepr.org/press/DP2051PR. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    When the legislative authority is exercised by the masses, they could frequently make hasty and unwise decisions on public policy. As Plato believes that all men are not created equal. With this in mind he favours an aristocracy of wise and educated philosophers, for democracy in his view would result

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of federalism in the USA?

    and the war was to decide. It is also important to mention that state and local governments can simply ignore minor groups, whereas reach communities will benefit from services provided by the state. Historically speaking, governments in USA have put their efforts in the groups which participate in politics and have an overall effect on forming of the economy.

  1. Green is the Colour: "how people of different races, the heirs of colonial and ...

    Mohammad A. Quayum comments about Dahlan in "Shaping a New National Destiny with Dialogic Vision": He is in favour of racial equality and religious tolerance, and yet his speeches at rallies incite more violence. This is because, despite his ideology, he lacks the stability to act upon it in a proper way.

  2. To what extent was the 1867 Reform Act a turning point in parliamentary democracy ...

    How they would vote was always a concern of the politicians with the magic wand, and large-scale treating would now not be possible as it had been in the past. Parties had to reorganise themselves, at local and national level but it would take a long time to do this

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    In France the second ballot 'majority-runoff' system is used in elections for the Presidency. Candidates obtaining an absolute majority of votes (50 percent+) in the first round are declared elected. If this is not the case a second round is held between the two candidates who got the highest number of votes.

  2. Free essay

    Outline the principal sources of authority available to US presidents. How similar is executive ...

    authority on the President, or he soon discovers that he has no power at all. Obviously, public and media focus is always on the President and as a result, expectations of a President often far exceed the individual's personal, political, institutional or constitutional capacities.

  1. INquisitorial Indonesia

    The accused is required to give evidence and therefore does not have the right to remain silent. Alternatively, in Australia there are strict rules of evidence including relevance, privilege, hearsay, similar fact and corroboration. The accused does not have to give evidence and are entitled to the right to remain silent.

  2. Notes on Citizenship and Democracy.

    This happen because one might be influenced by egoistic reasons such as a favor from a friendly parliamentarian or genuine reasons such as good concern for the society and its? environment. 1. Voluntary works: A group of people with the same interest such as guarding the flora and fauna or the physical and historical environment of their country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work