• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A new democracy will face many difficulties in deciding its new Governmental structure.

Extracts from this document...


The presidential model of government exists in a republic, where all the branches of government are separate.1 It is based on the premise that the power sharing bodies are clearly separated from one another in order that one may not exercise extraordinary powers over any other. The best example of this is the United States where the three branches of government; the Judiciary, the Legislature, and the Executive all have reserved powers and all can keep a check on the actions of any other. In this case the executive is elected completely separately that from any other branch of government, which is in contrast to a parliamentary system of government when the executive is drawn directly from the legislature; such as in Britain. The Presidential system works by making the process of legislation difficult and specifically needs approval by different branches of government. For example, for legislation to be passed in the United States, a Congressman, (Not the president) must propose the legislation; then it must be voted on in both houses; it must then go to committee stage in each house; it must further have the amended versions of this legislation passed by both houses; and only then can it be put in front of the President to sign. He can then veto the legislation or pass it; if he decides to veto it, Congress, if it has big enough majorities in both houses, can bypass the President and the legislation becomes law. In all this time, the Supreme Court, i.e. the Judiciary, can stop any piece of legislation as being unconstitutional. ...read more.


One problem which is normally glossed over is that the President is a 'winner take all contest', i.e. there is no ability to split the executive like there is Congress. The office therefore cannot become a coalition, because in a Parliamentary system when a party wins on a slim majority, it must rely on others, who the public would also see as fit to run the country to come to policy decisions collectively. Thus, a President, can in effect be in control of his reserved powers, (such as the power to grant pardons) without constraint, which can be worrying to certain members or groups in society. The parliamentary system would have to be sensitive to the greater plethora of views which the house holds in order to make certain decisions otherwise it will not get a majority and thus will be liable to a vote of no confidence. What this can however prevent is the ability for extremists to get into power. In most Parliamentary systems, the electoral system is a Proportional Representation one in which the vote more naturally reflects minorities in society. This can lead to extremist parties getting into Parliament and then being able to steer legislation to unfair or even racist ends. This touches on another problem the Presidential system suffers from. It is very difficult to remove the President from office. In the United States, the President has to be formally impeached by the House of Representatives, which requires a two-thirds majority of its members. ...read more.


to the Government, thus the President must rely on their support and especially their funding in a way that is not experienced in Parliamentary systems. It can therefore be argued that the expense spared in the bureaucracy means that the Government must source other areas of capital and thus loses some of its democracy in letting un-elected officials to have a say in legislation. In conclusion, a new democracy will face many difficulties in deciding its new Governmental structure, and a lot will depend on the previous administration and especially the history of the country.8 A Presidential system, although with its stable leadership and its greater democratic nature, is susceptible to outside influences such as big pressure groups and the inability to remove the leadership provide serious issues for the public to consider. Whereas in a Parliamentary system, personnel are easily moved around and the passage of legislation is clearly much easier to get through in times of crisis; although, like in the UK, a second chamber can sometimes not provide a good enough separation of powers and thus may lead to an over-powerful Prime Minister. What is important is consider the previous history, and in a country where authoritarian leaders have characterised its past, a Presidential system may not be so wise, whereas a country which has had a lot of ineffective coalitions through semi-democracies, may see a single head of state as preferable. 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_system 2 P. 270 Hague and Harrop Comparative Government and Politics 3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_system#Parliament_versus_Congress 4 http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=lame%20duck 5 http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/gw1.html 6 P.273 Hague and Harrop Comparative Government and Politics 7 http://.cepr.org/press/DP2051PR. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. INquisitorial Indonesia

    The degree of rigidity of these rules displays what each system feels is most important, with Indonesia's inquisitorial system focusing on attaining the most evidence from the most sources and Australia's adversarial system focusing on attaining the best evidence from the most reliable sources.

  2. Revision 2. Democracy and Identity Key Terms

    Discrimination This means making a distinction in favour of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs to. One example of a type of discrimination is if someone was Hindu and others were not people may exclude that

  1. Free essay

    Outline the principal sources of authority available to US presidents. How similar is executive ...

    authority on the President, or he soon discovers that he has no power at all. Obviously, public and media focus is always on the President and as a result, expectations of a President often far exceed the individual's personal, political, institutional or constitutional capacities.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of federalism in the USA?

    This idea, because of its success in NY, was introduced in the rest of the country and it is still fairly popular. There are, however, also disadvantages of the federalism in USA. One of them cam be conflict within the country over power.

  1. The United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; ...

    In terms of a parliamentary government system, unlike the presidential system the executive is organically linked to the legislature. The three main features would include that the governing parties emerge from the assembly. Government ministers are usually drawn from, and remain members of the legislature.

  2. Legislators have three essential functions: representation, law-making and control of the executive. How does ...

    * Use of the question hour has increased markedly over the past forty years, with more than 20,000 questions being posed during the 1987-90 term. Understandably, the opposition parties are active in exercising the parliamentary right to scrutinize government actions.

  1. American Democracy: An Ongoing Experiment

    Initially, a moratorium had been placed on the practice because of a disproportionate amount of minorities being sent to death. Many Democrats, however, suggested that capitol punishment should be abolished altogether arguing that it was "cruel and unusual punishment". Republicans, citing original intent, argued against the ban and eventually had it overturned.

  2. Notes on Citizenship and Democracy.

    Diplomatic protection in non-U state. Chapter 14: Democracy and Pluralism in Broadcasting: The Maltese Experience. 1. For democracy to work properly, citizens should be active and informed. With the help of the mass media citizens can share information and opinions and become critical and independent citizens.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work