• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Advantages and Disadvantages of First Past the Post System.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Advantages and Disadvantages of First Past the Post System The simple plurality system, commonly known as the First Past the Post System (FPTP), was designed in 1885 by the Conservatives and the Liberals to ensure that radical parties would not win any seats in parliament. Just over 650 single member constituencies send one MP to parliament, from all across the UK. The number of candidates has no bearing on the result of the election as the candidate with the greatest vote is the winner, even if the majority do not vote for the winner. One of the greatest advantages of the FPTP is that it tends to give the larger proportion of the total seats than its proportion of the votes, with the largest party usually having a clear majority. ...read more.

Middle

Finally, the FPTP system usually produces a strong government (with some exceptions) and the public generally feel happy with it, serving the purpose of a democratic state. On the down side, a majority of voters in a constituency vote against the winner and this could be seen as undemocratic, under the FPTP system. Moreover, any government elected represents only a minority of the voters. For example in the 2001 general election, only 42% of the British people voted Labour, the remaining majority (58%) voted for other political parties. With the FPTP system, the votes and the seats do not always correlate. Hence the majority of the people can vote for one party, while another party can get more seats and hence win the election. ...read more.

Conclusion

People are able to vote tactically, which can change the results of elections dramatically. For example, in 2003 Brent East by-election, the Liberal Democrats overturned a 13,000 Labour majority in a Labour 'safe' seat and won. This could be due to tactical voting by the Conservative voters who wanted to weaken the Labour position, and this makes it difficult to predict the outcome of future elections, and can be seen as undemocratic in its very nature. In some cases, for example in the 1997 elections of Scotland, almost 20% of the voters voted for the Conservatives, yet they failed to win a single seat. The final but very important downside is that voters only have one vote; they still have one vote even if they like the candidate but don't agree with the party's policies or vice-versa. Zafar Abbas Naquvi ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Describe the process by which MPs are elected to Westminster. What are the ...

    4 star(s)

    This means that confusions and uncertainties within public are prevented unlike the ones witnessed in the 2000 US elections. The speed of the process allows the new or re-elected government to take over without any disruptions to the countries political stability.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the devolution process in Scotland and Wales?

    Devolution has been very expensive, especially in Scotland. The escalating costs of the construction of the new Parliament building has led to widespread criticism. It was opened in 2004, three years later than expected and its estimated final cost was around �409 million, a huge increase from the original budget of �100 million.

  1. Russia - political past, present and future

    Dictatorship never saw a prosperous future, and Russia was not an exception. People were long fed up with the unlimited abuse and needed a strong leader that would change their lives. Vladimyr Ilyich Lenin was a good candidate to take this role.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of federalism in the USA?

    It can be seen while comparing states like Illinois and Oklahoma, Massachusetts and Oklahoma. In Illinois the death penalty is no more practised, whereas in Oklahoma it is still allowed. Oklahoma, on the other hand, does not support single-sex marriages, whereas it is allowed in Massachusetts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work