• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Alexander, a True Liberator

Extracts from this document...


September 13, 2007 HL History 2 Alexander II: The Reformer The defeat of Russia in the Crimean War unquestionably played significant role in urging Alexander II to trigger change, yet nothing could have been achieved in Russia had Alexander II refused to acknowledge the need for reform. Thus, Czar Alexander II accession to the throne in 1855, raised hopes for millions of peasants across the country. These hopes were in effect justified. As early as 1861, Tsar Alexander introduced a series of reforms that were by far the most "radical and far-reaching of any attempted by a European government" (41). Political prisoners were released, censorship was relaxed, tax debts were annulled, and most importantly, serfdom was abolished. In 1864, a new legal system provided open trials, jury system, and an independent judiciary. In addition, Alexander II improved the stagnating educational system, wherein he repealed the harsh measures which were implemented during the rule of Nicholas I. ...read more.


Thus, Alexander II was caught in the middle of a crisis: on one hand he was expected to pacify the nobility, and on the other, to please the peasants. To limit ourselves to these failures would be wrong and unfair towards this autocratic leader. It was expected of him to carry out one of the most difficult tasks that could ever confront an absolute ruler, "to completely remodel the enormous state which had been entrusted to his care, to abolish an age-old order founded on slavery, to replace it with civil decency and freedom..." (56) The will to accept to changes is already a big alone a big deal, but to ask of him to turn back on the philosophy of his ancestors is too selfish of a request. Beyond a doubt, the political and social liberation that resulted from the reforms was not exactly how Alexander II had pictured it to be, yet it was liberation ...read more.


This claim can be substantiated when analysing the inconsistent nature of Czar Alexander II reforms. He acknowledged the necessity for improve the system that had failed his people in the Crimean War, however, he was quite confused and anxious when he came across the more radical implications of his reforms. In the words of David Saunders, "the laws which freed the serfs emerged from a process that the Tsar barely understood and over which he had only partial control" (55). All in all, many of policies instituted by Alexander II were unconvincing, yet these failures cannot overshadow efforts. The intentions behind the implementation of these reforms was essentially driven by his will to assist his people, and not for his own self-interest. And for this selflessness, he most certainly deserves the title of the "Great Reformer". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent did Alexander II succeed in reforming Russian life and institutions?

    In the Phase 1, which was between 1861 and 1863, inventories concerning the division of the land amongst the peasants were made. Besides, they were tied to the Mir (peasant commune) as it was it that regulated each peasant dues and the taxes each peasant had to pay.

  2. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    works; exaltation of law or formula, red tape), authoritarianism (right to enforce obedience) and rationalism (practice of explaining the supernatural in religion in a way consonant with reason, or of treating reason as the ultimate authority in religion as elsewhere; theory that reason is the foundation of certainty in knowledge).

  1. Civil Service Reform.

    A new account set up to replace the faulty system was full of 'unexplained errors'. His criticism followed an annual audit of the accounts which found that the ministry missed its planned spending targets by �375 million and had not realised the errors until days before the end of the financial year.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    The Quarantine rules were also t strict and this slowed down the trade. They would spend 40 days in the port of Marsamxett. Another thing was the extension of warehouses. Protection was against freedom, thus protection from Britain was against the freedom and rights because if freedom were granted it would had upset the needs of the protector.

  1. Liberal Reforms.

    The writer is more concerned with the image of Britain and not the shocking reality of the true state of Britain was in at that time. He has a very unsympathetic attitude towards poor people in general. 'Get rid of them (the tramps)

  2. Once the war ended, Alexander Hamilton settled in New York, and began his great ...

    Right away Hamilton began to place the nation's unorganized finances on a sturdy grip. In a series of reports in 1790, he presented a program not only to calm down public funds but also to set a course for the prospect of the country as a powerful and industrial nation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work