• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

America has a two-party political system.

Extracts from this document...


Today it is widely considered that America has a two-party political system, i.e. two major political parties which regularly obtain over 40% of the popular vote in each major election. Today these are the Republicans and the Democrats, however in the time of Jefferson and Hamilton the distinctions which would serve to become the history of the present system were much more blurred and indistinct. With this in mind, my essay will discuss the reasons why a party system developed at all in America, and specifically the involvement of the two key players and the end of the 18th Century, namely Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Firstly I believe it is important to mention that the founding fathers did at no point envisage a party system breaking out. It was their intention, it is believed, to have had a system by which a plethora of different individuals would voice their views through Congress and the partisanship which had characterised the corruption of the British Parliament throughout the 1700's would not be emulated in the New Land. Thus when partisanship began to develop, it was to the disappointment of the first president George Washington, who, in his Farewell Address, urged his countrymen to 'forswear excessive party spirit'1. ...read more.


This caused major controversy as at this time manufacturing was an infant industry and many Congressmen could not see the benefit of attempting to invest this industry. Hamilton claimed that it was to make the America less dependant on imports, especially from Britain, of tertiary goods12. Jefferson and Madison however saw Jefferson's other aims; to take Federal money away from agriculture and from the pockets of their main support base, and to transfer it to the pockets of the already wealthy; Hamilton's support base. It was not until further into the same year, (1791), that general ideological opposition turned into rebellion. Whisky was an important part of the western states economy and when a tax was levied on Whisky, dissatisfaction swept the states in which republicanism was growing in popularity. Hamilton claimed the tax was to cut down the excessive drinking of the Western Americas, but Jefferson saw it as a more sinister tax, specifically targeting his supporters13. More people now started to support Jefferson in protest to the government, and the movement became more organised, and thus it is this piece of legislation, which I believe was the spark to the blue paper of unrest that had been growing throughout the Americas towards Federal Government. Unrest turned to rebellion and what is significant I believe, in contradiction to Professor Norton*, is that the true importance was ...read more.


However, other events, such as the French Revolution and the Whisky rebellion clearly had the effect of developing the party's from small scattered 'interest groups' into organised political opposition. Hamilton's financial plan I believe is especially crucial. I believe that because it was deliberately controversial, and in a time when the people were adjusting to a new Federal government, it may have been this antagonism which mobilised organised political opposition. 1 http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/gw1.html 2 P 197 Norton ..... A People and a nation 7th Edition 3 P.29 Bowers - Jefferson and Hamilton 4 P.28 Bowers - Jefferson and Hamilton 5 P.29 Bowers - Jefferson and Hamilton 6 P.198 Norton .... A people and a Nation 7th Edition 7 http://www.jimpoz.com/quotes/category.asp?categoryid=31 8 P.120 James Read - Power Versus Liberty 9 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3851909.stm 10 P. 199 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition 11 P.199 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition 12 P.199 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition 13 P.200 Norton .... A people and a Nation 7th Edition *I will refer to the Authors of A People and a Nation collectively under the name Professor Norton 14 P201 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition 15 P202 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition 16 P.207 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition American History - Q4A114 1 By David Weinberg 4020504 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    Neopopulist leadership has lead to the increase of corruption in Latin America. Keeping neopopulist leaders accountable to their populations is very difficult and enables neopopulist leaders to take bribes with a reduced risk of getting caught. Furthermore one of the classic traits of neopopulist leadership is disregard for democratic norms such as an independent judiciary.

  2. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    this and have expressed their views with the largest rally in London which bought together over two million people from all over England. As Rousseau argued that ('the people of England think they are free. They are gravely mistaken. They are free only during the election of Members of parliament').

  1. Russia - political past, present and future

    Tatarstan and the Republic of Chechnya were the only autonomous states that cause problems to the federation. They both declared independence together with other states, which separated from Russia when the Soviet Union collapsed. The Russian government settled things with Tatarstan through peaceful negotiation and both sides came to a

  2. To what extent does Britain have a two party system?

    In 1988 the merger of the Liberal Party and the SDP was clearly not working since they continued to fight elections under their old party names. When the Green Party beat the Liberal Democrats in the European elections of 1989, it was clear that third party politics was in serious decline.

  1. jeffersonian republicanism

    He wanted peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations without forming alliances with any. He proposed that a peoples' militia would be implemented to protect the country rather than an army or navy; Jefferson felt a country, so isolated as America, needed little defence.

  2. What is the best description of the UK party system? Two-party, Three-party, Multi-party or ...

    During that time it enjoyed several lengthy uninterrupted spells in power. Although these figures look persuasive the Conservatives never have got a very large percentage share of the vote but still managed to get into power thanks to the 'first past the post' electoral process.

  1. Why Was the Aristocracy Widely Perceived to be in Crisis in 1880-1950?

    Also many of the aristocracy benefited from their land in other ways other to farming, many gained revenue from mines, and property development, perhaps one of the most famous of all was, the Duke of Westminster. Though these alternatives could not make the ownership of land worthwhile.

  2. Decentralization and development of modern local government systems in Eastern Europe

    Service providers (schools, public works companies, et cetera) also cooperate without the patronage of local governments. The remaining budgetary institutions, though directly supervised by municipalities, have new modes of operation. Their positions increasingly are defined as direct labor organizations that are clearly separated from the local public administration.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work