• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

America has a two-party political system.

Extracts from this document...


Today it is widely considered that America has a two-party political system, i.e. two major political parties which regularly obtain over 40% of the popular vote in each major election. Today these are the Republicans and the Democrats, however in the time of Jefferson and Hamilton the distinctions which would serve to become the history of the present system were much more blurred and indistinct. With this in mind, my essay will discuss the reasons why a party system developed at all in America, and specifically the involvement of the two key players and the end of the 18th Century, namely Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Firstly I believe it is important to mention that the founding fathers did at no point envisage a party system breaking out. It was their intention, it is believed, to have had a system by which a plethora of different individuals would voice their views through Congress and the partisanship which had characterised the corruption of the British Parliament throughout the 1700's would not be emulated in the New Land. Thus when partisanship began to develop, it was to the disappointment of the first president George Washington, who, in his Farewell Address, urged his countrymen to 'forswear excessive party spirit'1. ...read more.


This caused major controversy as at this time manufacturing was an infant industry and many Congressmen could not see the benefit of attempting to invest this industry. Hamilton claimed that it was to make the America less dependant on imports, especially from Britain, of tertiary goods12. Jefferson and Madison however saw Jefferson's other aims; to take Federal money away from agriculture and from the pockets of their main support base, and to transfer it to the pockets of the already wealthy; Hamilton's support base. It was not until further into the same year, (1791), that general ideological opposition turned into rebellion. Whisky was an important part of the western states economy and when a tax was levied on Whisky, dissatisfaction swept the states in which republicanism was growing in popularity. Hamilton claimed the tax was to cut down the excessive drinking of the Western Americas, but Jefferson saw it as a more sinister tax, specifically targeting his supporters13. More people now started to support Jefferson in protest to the government, and the movement became more organised, and thus it is this piece of legislation, which I believe was the spark to the blue paper of unrest that had been growing throughout the Americas towards Federal Government. Unrest turned to rebellion and what is significant I believe, in contradiction to Professor Norton*, is that the true importance was ...read more.


However, other events, such as the French Revolution and the Whisky rebellion clearly had the effect of developing the party's from small scattered 'interest groups' into organised political opposition. Hamilton's financial plan I believe is especially crucial. I believe that because it was deliberately controversial, and in a time when the people were adjusting to a new Federal government, it may have been this antagonism which mobilised organised political opposition. 1 http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/gw1.html 2 P 197 Norton ..... A People and a nation 7th Edition 3 P.29 Bowers - Jefferson and Hamilton 4 P.28 Bowers - Jefferson and Hamilton 5 P.29 Bowers - Jefferson and Hamilton 6 P.198 Norton .... A people and a Nation 7th Edition 7 http://www.jimpoz.com/quotes/category.asp?categoryid=31 8 P.120 James Read - Power Versus Liberty 9 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3851909.stm 10 P. 199 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition 11 P.199 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition 12 P.199 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition 13 P.200 Norton .... A people and a Nation 7th Edition *I will refer to the Authors of A People and a Nation collectively under the name Professor Norton 14 P201 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition 15 P202 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition 16 P.207 Norton .... A People and a Nation 7th Edition American History - Q4A114 1 By David Weinberg 4020504 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent does Britain have a two party system?

    The Labour Party held referendums for devolution in Scotland and Wales soon after they came into power and subsequently a Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly was formed. Since devolution has occurred Scotland and Wales have grown more in favour for nationalist parties.

  2. Is Britain a two-party or a multi party system, or something else?

    In contrast, if parties adopt a strong political ideology for either the left or right, you have only the option to be voted for by people on the political right or left extremes, rather than the majority in the middle and subsequently less chance of victory.

  1. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    A government needs power to protect you from the theft and violence of the lawless neighbour, but what if government itself becomes a source of theft and violence? This statement criticises Hobbs for his assumption that only those in government have not got an evil mind.

  2. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    Neopopulist leaders such as Argentina's Carlos Menem, Ecuador's Lucio Guti�rrez and Venezuela's Hugo Ch�vez have looked towards those members of society to gain support, using television to drum up interest in them and their parties. Neopopulist leaders have an element of authoritarianism to their rule, claiming to "represent the

  1. What is the best description of the UK party system? Two-party, Three-party, Multi-party or ...

    During that time it enjoyed several lengthy uninterrupted spells in power. Although these figures look persuasive the Conservatives never have got a very large percentage share of the vote but still managed to get into power thanks to the 'first past the post' electoral process.

  2. Analysing The British Political System.

    The five tests are; Better for jobs Better for investment Better for the City Flexible labour markets Economic cycles compatible Conservative Policies on the Euro are at best divided. The leadership through Ian Duncan-Smith are against entry; however there is much support for entry among conservative M.P.s.

  1. Russia - political past, present and future

    Those are just a few of the main parties in the State Duma, however there are many more parties which are not significant enough to be present in Duma, however, I believe that Russia's multiparty system is a better example of a democratic representation of different beliefs and ideas compared with British or American two party systems.

  2. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    However both India and Pakistan perhaps realized that failure in Tashkent could result in renewed hostilities, with unpredictable consequences. Hence on 10 January they did sign an agreement the Tashkent Declaration. This was less an agreement ending the Kashmir dispute, as one allowing it to be pushed to one side so that the two countries could resume relatively normal relations15.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work