• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

American Democracy: An Ongoing Experiment

Extracts from this document...


American Democracy: An Ongoing Experiment At the conclusion of the American Revolution in 1776, the newly born United States had a very uncertain future ahead. Under the Articles of Confederation, which had led the colonies to victory against the British, the government was not entitled to perform the actions necessary to unify a nation. This central, yet limited government was an accurate representation of feelings toward government in the nation at the time. People were wary of executive power because of the unjust rule they had been subjected to. Prominent leaders of the young nation, however, recognized the drawbacks of the Articles of Confederation and called for the drafting of a constitution. Under a veil of secrecy, a Federal Convention was called. Fifty-five delegates convened in the State House (Independence Hall) in Philadelphia on May 14, 17871. These men enumerated the powers of the government under which we live today. The Federal Government was divided into three branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary. Furthermore, the legislative branch was divided into a bi-cameral legislature. The executive would take the form of a democratically elected president. Finally, the judicial branch would be known as the Supreme Court and be comprised of justices appointed by the president. ...read more.


They jeopardized the social norms instituted by the previous majority. As pluralism became more accepted in the early, twentieth century, Protestants fought not just to preserve the predominance of their religion, many also battled to enforce the moral norms associated with it.3 Though their numbers have grown exponentially in the past century, arguments made by the Christian Right based on the Bible are often dismissed as implausible for social policy. Refusing to resign themselves from a potentially corrupt society, the Christian Right attempts to use the vitality of its membership to bolster political power. This groups sees the pluralism and social liberalism in our society as a direct assault on their way of life. Since the 1970's, this religious minority has attempted to regain its status as the moral majority. It is where religion meets politics that consistency is muddled. While conservatives are quick to site the text to protect the right to bear arms, they do not see the same clarity in the stipulation that the church and state shall remain separate. Voting records suggest that most Republicans favor some form of religious teaching or practice in public schools. These schools receive public funding, however, and are thus considered part of the state. ...read more.


Furthermore, while in some cases the Republican party fights for original intent and to protect the rights of every citizen from the government, where religion is involved they not only vote their conscience, but attempt to force others to live in a way that is acceptable to their beliefs. Rather than commit wholeheartedly to a position that would alienate moderates, concessions are made. What has yet to be determined, however, is if the party is truly a religious group masking its Christian intentions or if they are committed to the rights and freedoms of the citizen yet aim to appeal to a religious audience. In either case, concessions are made that sacrifice ideology for political expediency. A core set of principals has long been out of sight in American politics. In an age where campaigns depend so heavily on finance, parties can little afford to offend potential supporters. Moreover, while some compromises in ideology are made, change is accomplished in smaller steps by moving the opinion of the moderates rather than by sweeping, radical effort. Unfortunately, this speaks poorly of American politics. It suggests that dogma has been defeated by the dollar and that convictions have lost out to convenience. It is apparent that two political parties, with broad, moderate views, cannot satisfy all issues with a consistent set of ideas. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    And in a politics characterized by techniques of "char dokhol" or "chandabaji", it is easier to justify extortion to their political leaders if the victims happen to be political opponents or their die-hard supporters or in other words those outside the purview of state power.

  2. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    In relating to the Detainee Crisis, the CCN tried to justify itself on the grounds that it thought the widespread reports about SWAPO imprisoning and abusing innocent people were South African propaganda. While some churches did express their regret, there was a failure for the 'CCN leaders to acknowledge their

  1. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    In 1922, the Conservatives won the election under Andrew Bonar Law, with the Labour Party finally making the breakthrough and finishing second, relegating the Liberals to third, a position that becomes familiar to them in the years to come. This meant that the Labour Party was able to finish second

  2. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    Settlement Proposals Despite the numerous third parties involved in the Angolan conflict, the UN has been the only one able to mediate and attempt to facilitate between the two warring parties. Throughout the conflict there was negligible dialogue between the two sides, who both desired an all-encompassing victory.

  1. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    modernising polity, the weaker and less accepted the political parties, the greater the likelihood of corruption." (8) Venezuela's two main established political parties are in a mess, Peru's long-dominant parties have lost ground to an amalgam of independent parties and in Argentina, the Peronist party which has dominated the country

  2. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    with an aura of sanctity' amid muted criticism. The public perception in Pakistan (thanks to army and government propaganda) was that the war had been going well- the 'invaders' had been successfully repulsed from Lahore-that even agreeing to a cease-fire had been a mistake.

  1. There are many different issues of disagreement between the British government and American ...

    On 5th March 1770 duties on glass, paper and china were repealed. However the 3-penny tax on tea remained. By continuing at the government maintained the central principal that parliament was entitled to levy duties.12 On the same day British soldiers fired on a threatening crowd killing five people.

  2. Why did Delegates from 12 States Meet in Philadelphia in 1787

    It also helped ensure that a similar kind of rule would not emerge following independence. The American colonists knew that to achieve independence all the separate colonies would have to work together, however the colonies enjoyed their individuality and were strongly against the notion of becoming one large country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work