• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"An Institution in decline." Discuss this view of the contemporary House of Commons.

Extracts from this document...


"An Institution in decline." Discuss this view of the contemporary House of Commons. The House of Commons has seven main functions; legitimating, Scrutinising, Accountability, Legislating, Law-making, Redressing of grievances and deliberating. If the contemporary House of Commons were in decline, we would see this by a decline in the effectiveness of the House of Commons when carrying out these functions. Looking at the functions of the House of Commons will help to assess whether or not the House of Commons is "an institution in decline." Legislation has to be approved by the House of Commons in order to give the consent of the people for the laws that they will be expected to follow. This is achieved in the function of legitimating in the House of Commons. No decline in effectiveness seems to be shown in this function. MPs are becoming more representative of the population as the House of Commons is slowly changing from being predominantly white, middle aged and middle class men to more representative of females and ethnic minorities; there are now 118 female MPs and the number of ethnic minority MPs has risen for the fourth time since 1945. ...read more.


However, there are many cases in which the House of Commons has made sure that people are accountable for their actions and example of this is the July 2001 AS Examination debate that asked questions to education ministers and gave the Opposition a chance to criticize the government; this acts as a deterrent for ministers as they don't follow any bad policies if there is a chance that they will have to fully justify their reasons for it. Legislating is passing laws. The House of Commons aren't expected to defeat government laws as the government has the majority. A problem of legislating is that the government usually gets what it wants as it dominates the House of Commons and MPs are unlikely to rebel; Tony Blair said in a speech "Look at the Tory party...They were all swept away, rebels and loyalists alike...you are here because of the Labour party under which you fought." This was to tell MPs that they had to be united or they would lose power like the Conservatives had. They were told that they should rely on their party because it was the only reason they had a job. MPs aren't willing to risk losing their salary for a rebellion. ...read more.


a "right to rule" to introduce the policies they were elected for. The statement that the House of Commons in an "Institution in decline" isn't correct because there is no evidence to show that the House of Commons isn't carrying out its roles effectively. There has been no decline in the effectiveness of the way in which the House of Commons carries out its roles of scrutiny, accountability, legislation, law making and redressing of grievances; as they are still carried out as well as they always had been. There have been improvements in the legitimating functions of the House of Commons as there is better representation and there is still a great deal of respect for other MPs as they represent their public constituency by the use of the title "honourable member." Another function that is being carried out ,ore effectively by the commons is deliberation due to better representation and an elected government. There are minor problems with the functions of the House of Commons that prove rather ineffective e.g. MPs are unlikely to rebel so they may be agreeing with their party rather than speaking to represent their constituents, but overall, the functions of the House of commons are carried out as effectively or if not, more effectively than in previous times. Siobhan Kiely October 2003 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How effective are M.P.'s at scrutinising the Government?

    This allows for an open government, through which M.P.'s can effectively scrutinise the government. Although some critics speculate that Select Committees have limited resources. Therefore they have insufficient funds to commission independent research into government, which would effectively allow them to scrutinise the government more meticulously.

  2. The House of Commons

    to MP's about promotions but this can only be used a few times, also access to treats which are gifts in return for party loyalty these gifts are known 'fact finding missions'. This point completely support the view that the house of commons can be described as a lapdog doing

  1. Distinguish between the different functions of the House of Lords and House of Commons

    Almost as if they have to make an account of everything they do. Actions and policies have to be explained, so they are justified and open to debate, however, this functions lay mainly with the House of Commons, therefore, it is not counted as a function for the House of Lords.

  2. For my creative piece I have written a short story set in the future, ...

    Let me tell you what really happened..." "As you may remember 2001 was an election year and a certain opposition, I mean political party, looked set to win. Here is were the corruption began. Slowly, but gradually, leading up to the election one of the parties, using government money, bribed everyone in power and set up a widespread election rig.

  1. To what extent does executive dominance over parliament prevent M.P.'s from carrying out their ...

    As a result showing that the executive dominance does not always lead to M.P.'s carrying out their role ineffectively. M.P.'s also scrutinize and amend bills in Standing Committees, but the effectiveness of these have been undermined by their partisanship, their limited expertise, limited information and limited time.

  2. One of the functions of the House of Commons is to effectively scrutinize the ...

    The concerned MP must let the Speaker know that he wishes to put a certain question and it is therefore the Speaker's of the House discretion whether to listen to the question later that evening after Question Time or schedule it for the next day.

  1. Consider the contribution of select committees to the House of Commons' scrutiny of government ...

    The recent success of the working of select committee could be seen in the for example Arms to Iraq, the Scott Inquiry, The Pergau Dam Controversy and the Chanel Tunnel Rail Link Affair. The inquiries undertaken by select committees are both broad ranging and in depth.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    had to be respected and tolerated by the King and Queen, together with their representatives, that in turn would receive tolerance from the Maltese authorities. There had to be no foreign interference in the Maltese spiritual and social affairs and any religious problems had to be solved by the Pope or by the head of any monastic order.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work