• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ben Hanson - Politics - Mr

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In what ways can the legislature hold the executive to account? Democracy is based on the idea that the people are self governing through their elected representatives, whom must be held to account for their actions. Our elected representatives are the government or 'executive' who create policies and apply legislations. Government policies and legislation must always be strongly checked and scrutinised to make sure that laws being passed are always for the common good. This is where the 'Queen in Parliament' or British legislative as they are more commonly known exercise their authority. The legislative comprises of the sovereign, the house of lords and the house of commons. These three governing bodies act as the peoples' agent and are therefore at the core of western democratic tradition. Indeed the legislative is primarily a law making body, but one of its other key roles is to scrutinise government policy and legislation. Over the past 800 years (since Magna Carta) the power of English monarchs has been steadily reduced. Nowadays the Queen's role in politics extends to little more than the ceremonial side such as the annual state opening of parliament. As a constitutional monarch, the Sovereign is required, on the advice of Ministers, to assent to all Bills. The Royal Assent (that is, consenting to a measure becoming law) has not been refused since 1707. Nowadays the queen still retains residual powers, which extend to the appointment of a prime minister and the power to decide whether to grant dissolution of parliament. The queen also retains the right to ensure her government carries on, if circumstances call for this measure. ...read more.

Middle

On a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday minister's answer MPs questions during 'Question Time.' The prime minister's is asked questions every Wednesday when the house is sitting. There are two different types of questions, which are called starred and unstarred. Starred questions are oral questions, which are asked face to face. The advantages of starred questions are that they attract publicity and that supplementaries can also be asked (for which a minister can have no warning and can therefore be caught off guard), while the disadvantage is that there is never the time to answer all the questions, but nevertheless the MP must stay in their place in case their name is called out at some point. Unstarred questions require written answers which require the minister in question to publish their written answer in Hansard - on average there are roughly three times more written answers than non-written, and despite the disadvantages of not having the same levels of publicity attached to them they do have the advantage of generally being longer and more involved. MPs can use question time as a way of revealing government intentions and also to raise grievances, which may have arose in their constituencies. Despite question time being a seemingly priceless way of holding the executive to account, many would argue that in fact it is not quite the tool that it is perceived to be for MPs. Firstly, the UK does not have a system of open government, the consequence being that due to the 'Official Secrets Act 1989' it is an offence to disclose or obtain wide categories of government information. ...read more.

Conclusion

Despite this the House of Commons will usually allow the Lords to amend bills concerning financial matters. Unlike the Commons the Lords does not have any control over the term of the Prime Minister or government. While the Lords has been made more representative with the removal of most hereditary peers, creating a situation whereby no party has overall control, every time it flexes its muscles, the government dismisses it for being unelected. Some would say that we need a second chamber which can effectively scrutinise and delay legislation based on a proper system of checks and balances and that the Lords is not it. As I hope I have demonstrated there are a number of ways in which the legislature can hold the executive to account, but all of which come with their pitfalls, respectively. The Queen's residual powers to hold the government to account seem impressive in theory, but in practice they would never work. The House of Lords along with committees have that extra time to fully check and scrutinise policy and administration, but unfortunately their efforts are often in vain. It is the House of Commons which holds the full bulk of the power, and rightly so as it is an elected body, which has been put their by the people, us. However, could it be that there are not sufficient checks in place to stop the executive from passing any legislation it chooses; after all it is the case that the powers of the upper house have been stripped bare over the last century. What I think is clear is that although the means for sufficient scrutinisation are in place the extent to which these means are exercised are somewhat lacking. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. For my creative piece I have written a short story set in the future, ...

    There's probably still people looking for me to this day..." "You should see it up there, it's terrible! Non-stop speakers blasting out some techno garbage while students with long sideburns sit around smoking and drinking. There is nothing we can do, as nobody has believed me up until now.

  2. What means are available to parliament and how effective is its scrutiny of the ...

    can provide, and politicians need ever greater funds to compete with their rivals to win over the electorate, governments actively do what they can to promote the interests of business". This is clearly supported by the fact that the New Labour government is now primarily funded by wealthy individuals and

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Arguments used in favour: * It is simple to understand. * The voter can express a view on which party should form the next government. * It tends to lead to a two-party system. The system tends to produce single party governments, which are strong enough to create legislation and

  2. The Uk policy making process.

    The titles of Presentation Bills indicate that the successful ones tend to be quite technical and specific - Licensing (Amendment)(Scotland), Common Land (Rectification of Registers), for instance. Finally, Peers are able to introduce Bills in the House of Lords at any stage in the parliamentary year, although relatively few avail themselves of this opportunity.

  1. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    The government proposal had suggested that the House should have a maximum of 600 members with the political balance adjusted to reflect share of the vote in the preceding general election and the final tally of 600 members would be fixed over ten years.

  2. How effective are M.P.'s at scrutinising the Government?

    Also question time has been criticised for being too stage-managed and ritualised. This is because of the use of 'planted questions'. This is where the Prime Minister gets sympathetic M.P.'s to ask him questions, which he already has a planed answer to.

  1. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    * Public Sector - Labour * Private Sector - Conservative and Liberal Democrats 9. Newspaper Readership * Daily Telegraph - Conservatives * Daily Mirror - Labour * The Sun - Conservative/Labour * Daily Mail - Conservative * Daily Express - Conservative/New Labour * Independent - Labour/LibDem * Times - Divided, Conservative What is a Parliamentary Government?

  2. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    4.1 949 4.4 1 045 3.6 1 153 2.64 Presbyterian 321 2 578 2.7 646 2.2 799 1.83 African Independent Churches18 2 313 14.5 2 716 12.5 5 857 19.9 253 0.58 The churches in South Africa fall into three categories.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work