• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain has a constitutional monarchy. The 'constitutional monarchy' is in which the monarch acknowledges the rights of the legislature and the executive branch of government1

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Britain has a constitutional monarchy. The 'constitutional monarchy' is in which the monarch acknowledges the rights of the legislature and the executive branch of government1, it also means that the monarch's power is largely exercised by the elected government2. In addition, the British constitution isn't set out in a single document. Instead it is made up of a combination of laws and conventions. In this article, one discussion of advantages and disadvantages of having a constitutional monarchy will be carried out. This discussion will be very important as it may change the British monarch's future and the British political situation. For example, the supporters of publican want to abolish the monarch and get an elected president for the public. In my own opinion, I recognize the advantages of the existence of the monarchy. However, I will only support the Monarchy if some reform can be conducted. The Advantages There are some arguments for the existence of current constitutional monarchy, as the monarch is an impartial neutral and experienced head of state and so provides a symbol for the nation and British people. These arguments praise the current monarch because of following advantages of the constitutional monarchy. The first advantage is that the monarchy sets standards of citizenship, family life and general morality. ...read more.

Middle

Many tourists came to Britain for this reason; they can watch a live of the monarch's life. On the other hand, the country like China, there is no more empire exists but empire's palace. Without the participation and activities of monarchy, there is also a lack of participation and activities to tourist compare with British one. The Royal prerogative can add legitimacy to the Parliament. 'As England's oldest secular institution, it is intertwined with the nation's identity and political culture.ii' In history, the development of Parliament is close connected with the delegation of the power from the Crown, so the Royal prerogative can add legitimacy to the Parliament. The activities such as opening of Parliament, regular visit to the Palace by the leader of the largest party, show this function and formal power of British Monarchy. Another argument in favour of monarch is that the Queen's long knowledge and experience is invaluable to prime ministers. As John Major mentioned in his recent article in the Telegraph Daily: The Monarchy has seen many overtake of one partisan government by another one, this make them very experienced and neutral than an elected politician as the head of state. Monarchy still remains some popularity in the modern society as the history last. Example by some of the Monarchy members has a good looking. ...read more.

Conclusion

August 1997: Diana is killed in a Paris car crash, along with companion Dodi Fayed, son of Egyptian-born businessman Mohamed Al Fayed, who alleges a conspiracy. The royal family also comes under heavy fire for a cool reaction to the episode. 8,9. Another view against Monarchy is that the redundant and server no purpose. The reason for this can be regard from what The development of Monarchy mentioned: Take royal ascent as example, the actions of monarchy is predictable, where there is no power and their personal choices get involved. The final argument against Monarchy could ascribe to their expensive cost. The anti-Monarchy group argues that Royal Family is surrounded by expensive pomp that is entirely unnecessary and anachronistic, which the elected president won't cost so much. In addition, most of money is needed to pay by taxpayer. Currently, according to the civil list, the cost are fixed at 7.9 millions per year. Conclusion: Whether to say there are more advantages or disadvantages for having a constitutional Monarchy in Britain, it depends on various factors. To conclude, there are many advantages for the continuity of the Monarchy. Most of these advantages are due to the historical and traditional backgrounds of the Monarchy, as well as its neutral and experienced role in the politics. On the other hand, the privilege given to the Monarchy is seemed to be bad for the more equal and democratic Britain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Should the Monarchy in the UK be abolished?

    The reason for this falling in support, is probably to do with the recent behaviour of the royals, before they were the model family, who idealised family life, however they are now full of affairs, bankruptcies and internal bickering Such event such as Prince Harry's under age drinking and drug

  2. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    With the 'Think Twice' campaign backed by MPs, even supported by Margaret Thatcher, devolution faced strong opposition. Even the SNP, the most victorious party in the outcome of the election, was opposed to the concept of devolution. They felt that devolution did not offer Scotland enough power over her own affairs.

  1. The advantages of the Uk having a constitutional monarchy are greater than the disadvantages. ...

    Generally speaking, democracy means "the belief in freedom and equality between people, or a system of government based on this belief, in which power is either held by elected representatives or directly by the people themselves"i Many people complain that monarchy is conservative and no longer suits the modern society.

  2. Why Did the Liberals Experience a Constitutional Crisis in the Period 1909-1911? How Successful ...

    Labour unrest was marked by major industrial disputes between 1910 and 1912 on the railways and in the mines and docks over pay, conditions, and (for the railwaymen and Dockers)

  1. A constitution is a set of laws, customs and conventions, which together defined the ...

    Legislation is the primary purpose for which representatives were brought together. The House as a whole is a legitimising body, by giving their assent to legislation put forward. Robert Packenham described this as the function of "latent legitimisation", simply by meeting on a regular basis, they can give the government a moral right to rule.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    The conditions were yet a drawback for the Maltese. For example in Cephalonia, the problem was that there was too much conflicts between the Maltese community and the government authority. These conflicts lead to more other serious problems, thus the migration to this destination was considered as a failure.

  1. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    In addition, Labour would sustain independent cross-bench attendance of life peers, thus no political party could obtain a majority in the House of Lords. Lastly, a committee of both Houses of Parliament is set up to review the further changes and then submit the proposals for reform on the particular future changes.

  2. In the 1930's and 1940's Britain was in very bad shape.

    to fight the "want" giant. This covered all adults providing increased sickness and unemployment benefit, old age pensions, widows' and orphans' pensions, maternity allowances and death grants. The national Assistance act (1948) which provided benefits for those not covered by national insurance, for example old people receiving pensions under the scheme set up in 1908.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work