• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain was humiliated by international opinion and made to look foolish after the Suez crisis.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Britain was humiliated by international opinion and made to look foolish There is no doubt that after the Suez crisis, Britain's world importance had been undermined, it had been humiliated at the U.N general assembly and its dependence on the USA was now completely evident. Socialist Russia now seemed triumphant and omnipotent over Western Europe while the former might of the British economy now looked weak, impotent and had plunged into a recession. Eden's domestic government fell within months leaving the high moral position, so pivotal in Britain's foreign policy in tatters. The commonwealth too was now more distant than ever, furthering Britain's mortification and loss of prestige. Overall, Britain's assault on Egypt was almost universally condemned throughout the global community resulting in a formerly revered and prominent country in a state of disarray and humiliation. ...read more.

Middle

Other hostile attitudes towards war such as this one were echoed in countries still under heavy British influence, particularly in Africa. Many of these countries saw the attack as aggressive and imperialistic and wanted to move away from what seemed to be a neo colonialist Britain. This was humiliating as an invasion which, in essence, was implemented partly to stop an anti British movement (the pan Arab Movement) resulted in actually catalysing another different Anglophobic movement in Africa. The condemnation of Britain's aggressive actions was however, due to the international opinion formed by ordinary citizens. The general public in Britain was no different, the labour party encouraged a huge protest in Trafalgar square and British public opinion catalysed by the media was hugely critical of the government. This is demonstrated by sources F where the assault on Egypt is described as "immoral" Many people in Britain resented Eden's analysis of Nasser who he compares to Hitler in source A. ...read more.

Conclusion

A quote from Sir Pierson Dixon Britain's representative at the U.N demonstrates how costly and humiliating military intervention in Egypt proved to be: 'At the time I remember feeling very strongly that we had, by our actions reduced ourselves from a first to a third class power'. Thus demonstrating that Britain was now firmly behind the USA and USSR and now had to accept it's knew position and role within the international community. In conclusion the Suez crisis was a complete disaster for Britain leading it to succumb to a new world order in which the superpowers were to dominate. After the invasion it was clear that Britain was never going to maintain its empire and in my opinion decolonisation in the sixties was made easier because of the events of 1956. Overall I agree with this statement as Britain looked like it was returning to its older imperial ways, it was humiliated in the U.N and the British public opinion made Eden's government look undemocratic to an outside observer ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Which major domestic and international factors made German unification possible?

    Eastern European countries, particularly Hungary began to relax their border controls, and suddenly Germans were able to move through Eastern Europe and into the FRG, something they hadn't been able to do for many years. The eventual result of this was a mass exodus and a general weakening of the GDR.

  2. Critically evaluate the case the Yeltsin administration made for the use of force in ...

    the nation after the invasion uncompromisingly explained how the Federation felt , 'The Chechen Republic is part of the Russian Federation. Its membership is codified in the Constitution. No geographic area has the right to secede from Russia' (Shulman, p115).

  1. Why has Russia been prepared to execute two military campaigns in Chechnya since the ...

    The 1994 campaign was initially expected to be a short, sharp affair but it became evident as it progressed that the Russian Military were not going to have it all their own way. In 1996, the Russian Army suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Chechen Rebels.

  2. Multicultural Britain

    Commonwealth immigration effectively began in the 1950s but the effect on total population was counterbalanced until 1983 by the emigration of British citizens. Racial anxiety led to consecutively tighter restrictions on immigration, beginning in 1962. Controls on Commonwealth citizens were brought into line with those already applying to all foreigners.

  1. Tiananmen Square

    The Chinese people loved it and demanded more. The power of this demand was seen in Tiananmen Square. However, the source does not really tell us directly about the causes or events that caused the Tiananmen Square incident. Therefore, this source is not of much of use as it is not directly related with the Tiananmen Square incident.

  2. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    Following Lusaka, Savimbi was offered the vice-presidency twice and after a prolonged period he turned it down. Savimbi has directly demanded that he should have power over at least some of the military and mining operations in Angola. This would be an impossible compromise for the MPLA, because it would give Savimbi too much destabilising power in the capital.

  1. Why Was the Aristocracy Widely Perceived to be in Crisis in 1880-1950?

    Post 1880, also saw the clearance of other asserts owned by the aristocracy in order to maintain itself in this new hostile society. Surely the selling one's once treasured heirlooms, like the land illustrates a class in crisis. This act also demonstrates the aristocracy in decline as the premier keepers

  2. France and Britain: The Difference Within.

    And that these rights should not be violated under any circumstance. France on the other hand, has a history of conflict and militarism. People believe meaningful change comes only from violent upheaval, with proof coming from having their 16th constitution being worked on.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work