• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain was humiliated by international opinion and made to look foolish after the Suez crisis.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Britain was humiliated by international opinion and made to look foolish There is no doubt that after the Suez crisis, Britain's world importance had been undermined, it had been humiliated at the U.N general assembly and its dependence on the USA was now completely evident. Socialist Russia now seemed triumphant and omnipotent over Western Europe while the former might of the British economy now looked weak, impotent and had plunged into a recession. Eden's domestic government fell within months leaving the high moral position, so pivotal in Britain's foreign policy in tatters. The commonwealth too was now more distant than ever, furthering Britain's mortification and loss of prestige. Overall, Britain's assault on Egypt was almost universally condemned throughout the global community resulting in a formerly revered and prominent country in a state of disarray and humiliation. ...read more.

Middle

Other hostile attitudes towards war such as this one were echoed in countries still under heavy British influence, particularly in Africa. Many of these countries saw the attack as aggressive and imperialistic and wanted to move away from what seemed to be a neo colonialist Britain. This was humiliating as an invasion which, in essence, was implemented partly to stop an anti British movement (the pan Arab Movement) resulted in actually catalysing another different Anglophobic movement in Africa. The condemnation of Britain's aggressive actions was however, due to the international opinion formed by ordinary citizens. The general public in Britain was no different, the labour party encouraged a huge protest in Trafalgar square and British public opinion catalysed by the media was hugely critical of the government. This is demonstrated by sources F where the assault on Egypt is described as "immoral" Many people in Britain resented Eden's analysis of Nasser who he compares to Hitler in source A. ...read more.

Conclusion

A quote from Sir Pierson Dixon Britain's representative at the U.N demonstrates how costly and humiliating military intervention in Egypt proved to be: 'At the time I remember feeling very strongly that we had, by our actions reduced ourselves from a first to a third class power'. Thus demonstrating that Britain was now firmly behind the USA and USSR and now had to accept it's knew position and role within the international community. In conclusion the Suez crisis was a complete disaster for Britain leading it to succumb to a new world order in which the superpowers were to dominate. After the invasion it was clear that Britain was never going to maintain its empire and in my opinion decolonisation in the sixties was made easier because of the events of 1956. Overall I agree with this statement as Britain looked like it was returning to its older imperial ways, it was humiliated in the U.N and the British public opinion made Eden's government look undemocratic to an outside observer ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Which major domestic and international factors made German unification possible?

    Eastern European countries, particularly Hungary began to relax their border controls, and suddenly Germans were able to move through Eastern Europe and into the FRG, something they hadn't been able to do for many years. The eventual result of this was a mass exodus and a general weakening of the GDR.

  2. Critically evaluate the case the Yeltsin administration made for the use of force in ...

    Equally the constitution was used to justify the level of force Russia had used; Shakhrai claimed the government is 'obligated to use all means at its disposal to provide security, legality and order' (Shulman, p115). Russia argued Chechnya was out of control, including huge amount of illegal activity, violence and

  1. Why has Russia been prepared to execute two military campaigns in Chechnya since the ...

    The 1994 campaign was initially expected to be a short, sharp affair but it became evident as it progressed that the Russian Military were not going to have it all their own way. In 1996, the Russian Army suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Chechen Rebels.

  2. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    Following Lusaka, Savimbi was offered the vice-presidency twice and after a prolonged period he turned it down. Savimbi has directly demanded that he should have power over at least some of the military and mining operations in Angola. This would be an impossible compromise for the MPLA, because it would give Savimbi too much destabilising power in the capital.

  1. Why Was the Aristocracy Widely Perceived to be in Crisis in 1880-1950?

    of art, and more importantly a decline in status, which was a vital part of the aristocracy. The ownership of land had also suffered unlike before, as it had now become part of a global economy. Whereas previously the landowners had had a monopoly on the nations economy, they were

  2. The two countries of India and Pakistan have been waging war against one another ...

    laws are implemented and the Constitution is not enforced.' ... India appears unlikely to make a major national effort to root out the deeply ingrained caste system until worldwide outrage shames India's elite into taking drastic action. 2 India's caste system is deeply ingrained in the minds of many individuals

  1. Britain 1929-51 - What is meant by 'an international financial crisis' in relation to ...

    Although the Labour government was essentially a socialist party, Macdonald had always argued that since they were a government without a majority, they must act in a way that would reflect this, hence his and several other Labour MP's wish to act in traditional fiscal policy by balancing the budget in 'national interest'.

  2. Multicultural Britain

    (See Appendix 1). Legal massacres of the Jews were organised by the government, these were known as pogroms. The worst of these took place at Kishinev in 1903 where over 500 people were injured, 49 were killed, 700 houses were destroyed leaving 2000 families homeless.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work