• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain was humiliated by international opinion and made to look foolish after the Suez crisis.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Britain was humiliated by international opinion and made to look foolish There is no doubt that after the Suez crisis, Britain's world importance had been undermined, it had been humiliated at the U.N general assembly and its dependence on the USA was now completely evident. Socialist Russia now seemed triumphant and omnipotent over Western Europe while the former might of the British economy now looked weak, impotent and had plunged into a recession. Eden's domestic government fell within months leaving the high moral position, so pivotal in Britain's foreign policy in tatters. The commonwealth too was now more distant than ever, furthering Britain's mortification and loss of prestige. Overall, Britain's assault on Egypt was almost universally condemned throughout the global community resulting in a formerly revered and prominent country in a state of disarray and humiliation. ...read more.

Middle

Other hostile attitudes towards war such as this one were echoed in countries still under heavy British influence, particularly in Africa. Many of these countries saw the attack as aggressive and imperialistic and wanted to move away from what seemed to be a neo colonialist Britain. This was humiliating as an invasion which, in essence, was implemented partly to stop an anti British movement (the pan Arab Movement) resulted in actually catalysing another different Anglophobic movement in Africa. The condemnation of Britain's aggressive actions was however, due to the international opinion formed by ordinary citizens. The general public in Britain was no different, the labour party encouraged a huge protest in Trafalgar square and British public opinion catalysed by the media was hugely critical of the government. This is demonstrated by sources F where the assault on Egypt is described as "immoral" Many people in Britain resented Eden's analysis of Nasser who he compares to Hitler in source A. ...read more.

Conclusion

A quote from Sir Pierson Dixon Britain's representative at the U.N demonstrates how costly and humiliating military intervention in Egypt proved to be: 'At the time I remember feeling very strongly that we had, by our actions reduced ourselves from a first to a third class power'. Thus demonstrating that Britain was now firmly behind the USA and USSR and now had to accept it's knew position and role within the international community. In conclusion the Suez crisis was a complete disaster for Britain leading it to succumb to a new world order in which the superpowers were to dominate. After the invasion it was clear that Britain was never going to maintain its empire and in my opinion decolonisation in the sixties was made easier because of the events of 1956. Overall I agree with this statement as Britain looked like it was returning to its older imperial ways, it was humiliated in the U.N and the British public opinion made Eden's government look undemocratic to an outside observer ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Multicultural Britain

    The job opportunities were what appealed to most, but, also the political opportunities and freedom offered. Q2) How far do you agree that Britain has been a tolerant nation?

  2. Tiananmen Square

    It is biased. Also, it doesn't tell us why the conditions improved. It states only figures. Source C Source C is very useful to historians studying the causes and events of Tiananmen Square. This is due to one simple reason, it is proof that there really were demonstrations and that they consisted of thousands of people.

  1. Which major domestic and international factors made German unification possible?

    up addressing their roles in German unification, the 2 plus 4 talks occurred which ended up being 3 against 1 with the USSR being that one against the West and China. The USSR however "had some 340,000 troops stationed in the GDR"3 which evidently meant that they could not be ignored from these talks and the demands that they made.

  2. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    So far UNITA has proved unwilling to do this. The power-sharing problem also concerns the political leaders Jonas Savimbi and President Dos Santos. Getting them to meet has been an uphill struggle; both men refusing to leave their territories for fears of personal safety.

  1. Why Was the Aristocracy Widely Perceived to be in Crisis in 1880-1950?

    of art, and more importantly a decline in status, which was a vital part of the aristocracy. The ownership of land had also suffered unlike before, as it had now become part of a global economy. Whereas previously the landowners had had a monopoly on the nations economy, they were

  2. France and Britain: The Difference Within.

    There is a main underlying belief that the only true meaningful change comes from direct action. They are highly ideological, with many people on the ideological left and right extremes. The people of France believe in equality, and individualism, and are psychologically against organization.

  1. Critically evaluate the case the Yeltsin administration made for the use of force in ...

    The case put forward questioned Dudayev and the Chechen government's position and reasons for independence, claiming this was 'fundamentally a civil war within Chechnya, and not one of an ethnic group seeking to govern itself' (Shulman, p114). Through this argument Russia could claim to be restoring freedom to Chechnya, giving

  2. Why has Russia been prepared to execute two military campaigns in Chechnya since the ...

    These rumours were more potent on the worldwide stage and lead to the political condemnation of Russia's actions. These attacks in Moscow allowed Yeltsin to attempt another military assault in Chechnya and unlike the previous unsuccessful attempt, he now had the full backing of the people as they saw the new campaign as retaliation against terrorism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work