• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

British Government and the Constitution "Government without a Constitution is power without a right."

Extracts from this document...


British Government and the Constitution "Government without a Constitution is power without a right." Thomas Paine, Rights of Man A slight problem with attempting to discuss the British constitution is that Britain doesn't have a constitution, not in any traditional sense. In fact, what Britain does have are aged customs, traditions, man-made religious beliefs and a kind of indoctrinated attempt at moral law. Britain is not, in a strict sense, a democracy. Britain is, in fact, a Monarchy with a democratically elected representative parliament. How then can we define a domestic constitution? In 1215, an early attempt at keeping the populous in order found its way into national history in the form of the Magna Carta, which was soon discarded by the powers that were as unworkable, leaning heavily as it did on Godly conviction. Over a period of time, an early parliament constantly struggled with the crown on issues of supremacy until in 1688, a group of seven Whigs invited William of Orange and his English wife, Mary Stuart, to become joint rulers in place of James II. ...read more.


The two principles, as discussed by John Locke, have changed dramatically, we now see the constitution thus: The rule of Law and the supremacy of parliament. (But a lawyer and a political scientist may argue different points of view, no longer can lawyers pretend that the constitution is theirs, writing about it in narrow-minded isolation.) Although there is no question that it is the achievement of lawyers, Judges and other practitioners of the discipline of law have also made a notable contribution to it, as have political philosophers, controversialists, party organizations, peers, rebels and a legion of those specially interested. Indeed, a British government is not tied to a written charter, binding them to a specific approach. Perhaps this is why we see so much brazen, "...left-liberal, amoral, conformist ignorance in society today..." Peter Hitchens, The Mail on Sunday 08-12-2002. He goes on to add, "...In 1983...only 12 per cent of people wanted to legalise the dangerous, mind bending poison, cannabis...41 per cent support this suicidal policy [today]...in the Eighties, 70 per cent thought homosexuality was wrong. ...read more.


Many more matters are decided at the National level than in, say, Germany or Belgium. Both member states achieving an effective level of regional government. In fact, did not the amalgamation of the East and West (in Germany) see the distribution of wealth for the common good? The last four years in Britain have seen hesitant steps towards regional government, notably in Scotland and Wales, but treating regional authorities as representatives of Westminster rather than representatives of the people does not really change very much. A federal system would be much better. Regional authorities would be directly elected and exercise clearly defined powers. Such a system would bring people nearer to the decisions that most affect their lives. The power of distant bureaucrats would be reduced. A federal Britain would provide new protection of the rights of the individual, and might even lead to a change in opinion towards a united federal Europe. Surely its time to look to the future, to stop needless legislation and the continued march of self-indulgence and work in favour of a constitution that would benefit England, Britain, Europe and indeed, humankind the World over. Scrotum ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Define and discuss an autocratic system of government - While most essays are likely ...

    The definition of democracy shouldn't be taken for granted as its interpretation clearly relies on the application of it. The common theme of democracy involves having effective political power vested in the people. Theoretically, it leaves government decisions to be made according to popular will, or at least according to the supposed values and interests of the population.


    Our modern concept of separation of powers is, in fact, mostly drawn from the writings of 18th century French political theorist, Charles de Montesquieu. In reality, the separation of powers he describes has never been implemented fully in England or, most likely, anywhere else.

  1. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    the House of Commons and at an early age, William was given lessons on how to become an effective orator" (Sparticus, 2005 Pg1). At Cambridge, William Pitt studied political philosophy among other subjects. "At university, Pitt worked hard and showed a reserved, aloof and self-controlled character" (Biography of William Pitt, 2005 p1).

  2. Does Hobbes's Sovereign or Locke's Civil Government provide better protection for the citizen?

    This is the hard line that Hobbes felt he needed to implement, as during a state of war, citizens needed to be told what to do and need a strict law to abide by. Everyone needed to follow the same set of rules; this kind of sovereign is seen as an Absolutist government.

  1. The Constitution Party

    One example of their platform is the ending of legal abortion. The party bases this thesis on Article IV of the U.S.

  2. There are many different issues of disagreement between the British government and American ...

    In 1765 the Virginia House of Burgesses adopted a series of resolutions that denounced parliamentary taxation and declared that only their elected representatives had the right to raise taxation. In Boston opposition led to violence. Stamp collector Andrew Oliver was forced to resign from his post and opposition came to a climax when lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson's house was destroyed.

  1. Britain has no written constitution or comprehensive Bill of Rights, and is found partly ...

    The representation of the peoples 1949 and 1969 regulate elections, and the European Communities Act 1972 regulates relationships between the UK parliament and the European Union. Despite the centuries of sovereignty, however, legislature, executive, and judiciary have now recognised that law made by the European Union is supreme within the field of community competence as determined by the Union itself.

  2. Who Holds Power in the United Kingdom Today?

    Well, Marxists would suggest that there are 'faceless power entities' such as multi-national companies, the IMF, the world bank and the EU, who work in conjunction with the government. In particular, the mass media, who play a critical role in swaying public opinion during general elections and referendums.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work