• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Danielle Warren British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849 Question: To what extent were British Politicians to blame for the disaster resulting from the Irish potato famine of 1845? "Is ar sc�th a chi�le a maireann na daoine" "It is with each other's protection that the people live" From the Fifteenth through to the Nineteenth centuries English Monarchies and Governments had consistently enacted laws which it seems were designed to oppress the Irish and suppress and destroy Irish Trade and manufacturing. In the Penal laws of 1695 which aimed to destroy Catholicism, Catholics were forbidden from practicing their religion, receiving education, entering a profession, or purchasing or leasing land; since Catholics formed eighty percent of the Irish population, this effectively deprived the Irish of any part in civil life in their own country. In the eighteenth century the Irish condition had improved: The Irish merchant marine had been revived and ports improved, and the glass, linen, and clothing industries developed. Agriculture had also been improved and in 1782 the Irish Constitution was formed. But this changed when William Pitt became British Prime Minister. He imposed a "free trade policy", which destroyed Ireland's new industries, particularly linens, by eliminating independent Irish shipping. A condition of "Free trade" was that Ireland should not trade with any country where trading would clash with the interests of the East India Company; England's mightiest corporation, who were heavily involved particularly in the lucrative trade with India. This was typical of the British belief in protectionist economics. The role of parliament was to protect the interests of the powerful few who effectively pay rolled the government by their industry and profits against the plight of the many. British politicians were also careful not to affect private enterprise, and believed that it was counter-productive to interfere in economics. Advocates of Bentham had influenced the political attitudes of a generation. They had a natural distrust of the idea of state aid, which they believed would create what would later be called a dependency culture, and lead to national bankruptcy. ...read more.

Middle

of the Irish was worse than that of slaves in the Americas; In the American plantations on Rhode Island, black slaves had a saying: "If a negro was not a negro, Irishman would be negro" Even though the government was pre-warned of the disaster waiting to happen, their efforts to relieve the famine, such as they were, were entirely futile, and bound by the free trade policy; this determined that no money should be spent on infrastructure projects which would benefit the Irish, such as drainage, harbours, fisheries and railways. These were amongst the first urgent proposals made by a committee of Irish citizens in 1845 to the government of Sir Robert Peel. Other proposals doomed to failure were: to stop the export of corn and distilling of grain into spirits, to set up relief committees funded in part by a ten percent tax on landlords; higher in the case of absentee landlords, and in part by a one and a half million pound, ten year British loan. The only proposal which was not ignored by Peel was that duties should be removed on food imports. This he agreed to because it would make the import of Irish corn into Britain easier. Peel did buy $100,000 of Indian corn and meal from the USA for the relief of the famine, which may seem a considerable gesture, however since the crop loss was �3.5 million, this was a wholly inadequate amount to ease suffering, and this corn and meal was not immediately distributed either. It was stored in military lockups and used only to as a leverage stock to prevent the over-fast rise in the market price of foodstuffs. �365,000 of government grants were also given to help Ireland through the first year, and the formation of relief committees to propose public works was allowed, but without any British funds, they relied on charitable donations. ...read more.

Conclusion

the Laissez faire attitudes of the British at the time, and the situation became considerably worse when Lord John Russell became Prime Minister, because of the slavish adherence to free trade and the interests of the entrepreneur. Lord Russell would never have conceived of interfering with the structure of the British and Irish economies in ways which would have been necessary to prevent the worst effects of the famine. Hoppen's view is rather ill-framed; why does he consider so little more could have been achieved by the same state system had there been a will to take efficient generous and effective action rather than resorting to the utopian " authoritarian state committed to the welfare of the poor at all costs" ? I agree that a state hampered by the prejudices and the vested interests of those in power and controlling commerce, such as existed at the time, could do little to help the situation of the poor, but I find his "solution" rather glib. In conclusion it is my contention that British politicians were more widely to blame for the disaster resulting from the Irish potato famine than may be thought, because rather than looking at the actions or omissions of the contemporary politicians, we must take into consideration that after nearly seven hundred years of attempted domination, the British oppression of the Irish had deprived them of all but the bare necessities of survival, and caused such destitution that when the potato famine struck, the poor could not avoid the worst privations, given the social and political conditions controlling their lives. The British government's ineffectual attempts at relieving the situation played a major role in worsening the situation; they allowed prejudice and State and individual self-interest, economic and religious dogma to subjugate even the least consideration for humanity. Ultimately British politicians bear considerable blame because they were not prepared to allocate what was needed to head off mass starvation, and they as the parent government did nothing to protect its subject people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Parnell and the Irish Parliamentary Party 1882-5 After the Kilmainham ...

    In 1889, however, a judicial investigation revealed that the articles were based on forged letters. The collapse of the case against Parnell led to a wave of public sympathy. Yet within a year Parnell's personal reputation and his political career were virtually in ruins.

  2. To what extent are senior British civil servants still “anonymous, permanent and politically neutral?” ...

    The main consequence of the Next Step reforms on the traditional features of Senior British civil servants is on their permanence. As the emphasis in the Next Steps Agencies is firmly on cost-effectiveness and good private-sector styled management, many of the chief executives were imported directly from some of Britains most efficient companies.

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    The pamphlets were originally written in English but as the Italian language was the one that the citizens understood, it was proposed to translate it even if the governor said no as he didn't want the Maltese people to read it.

  2. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Another piece of controversial legislation Peel introduced was the sugar duties act of 1844. The problem was the British West Indies colonies were unable to deal with acceleration demand. The government were unable to find alternative supplier of the "free" sugar as they were committed to do so.

  1. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    At first, although not joining in on the anti Irish and Catholicism, Peel and the leaders were at least 'wise enough not to disassociate themselves from it'; this split therefore as Stewart puts it was 'papered over'. However, it did not last, the biggest controversy was caused by the Mounoth

  2. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    Government now consisted of reformers and anti-reformers. Reformers looked to Pitt as their parliamentary leader, instead of Fox. In 1783, King George III once again attempted to dismiss the coalition between North and Fox, and offered the role of forming a Government to Pitt.

  1. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    While there were convictions, they rarely touched those at the very top of the regime. While Latin American states like most states have laws that clearly state that corruption is illegal and breaking them should result in punishment, often the enforcement of these laws doesn't happen, only in the

  2. Assess Mao's domestic policies

    Severe activities took place, led by eager communist students proudly displaying their 'Red Guard' arm bands. As time went on, rumours were constantly circulating regarding Mao's health. It was questionable whether he was still a suitable leader for China if he was unable to make proper decisions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work