• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"By 1942, SEAsian Nationalism was largely a failure." How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"By 1942, SEAsian Nationalism was largely a failure." How far do you agree with this statement? Nationalism is a process whereby the people living in a certain region became more aware of themselves as a distinct group like a nation with a shared purpose, destiny and common goals. Nationalistic movements in SE Asia happened during the period of 1800s to 1942 by which in 1942 and most SE Asian nationalist movements ended up as failures. The statement that "SE Asian Nationalism was largely a failure." is true because by 1942, none of the Nationalist movements had achieved their aim of independence. However despite SE Asian nationalism being largely a failure, nationalism did Asia a service - it helped to raise political, social and economic consciousness amongst the people of SE Asia. ...read more.

Middle

TS: Another reason for the failure of SE Asian nationalism was the over reliance of its members on its leader. Several radical nationalist movements crumpled after the Colonial governments arrested their leaders. Evidence: (i) Saya San Rebellion, led by Saya San himself, lasted for two years from 1930 to mid-1932. The rebellion ended with Saya San's execution. It showed the effectiveness of the British response using the "applying the stick" method, which put the movement to rest. (iii) Sukarno was a leader of the PNI who was charismatic and had excellent oratorical skills. The Dutch imprisoned Sukarno in 1929 and this caused the nationalist movement to integrate by the 1930s. The removal of the key leader most effectively crippled the nationalist movement. Evaluation: The colonial powers managed to cripple various movements and segregated the party by removing the key figures and leaders. ...read more.

Conclusion

SE Asian nationalism was indeed largely a failure due to the disunity within the ranks of various nationalist groups and the response of the Colonial powers with regards to the nationalist movements and rebellions which were poorly organized by these nationalist parties. The colonial response towards the nationalist activities were also well targeted in removing key figures and thus caused the various parties to break up and eventually die out. However despite the major failures SE Asian nationalism faced, it was a turning point for the people in SE Asia as it brought to light issues about independence and being a nation which would have never been realized by the SE Asian people without nationalism. There is no doubt that was largely a failure, as it did not accomplish the goal of independence from the colonial powers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    There had grown up in India generations of professionals and paraprofessionals and a wide range of others with equally needed skills who knew and could work with the British. In 1917, the Colonial Secretary announced in Parliament that it was government policy to place as many Indians as possible in the Burmese administration.

  2. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    politics meant that he lost sight of the objective of Indian leaders. By consistently pushing for complete independence at every possible opportunity, rather than looking for gradual concessions from the British government that would lead to independence, it could be said that Gandhi undermined his effectiveness as a political figure.

  1. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    eventually give him strength to implement his policies, furthermore, to prevent them from becoming a coup and overthrowing his state, which often happens to middle-eastern states. Ataturk managed fulfill this task with great ease as he illustrated that his work was committed national interest and as a result in response

  2. Mazzini's ideas and inspiration transformed attitudes to change in Italy in the 1830's - ...

    During his brief but intense experience as a revolutionary leader, Cattaneo developed a deep distrust of the Peidmontese monarchy and its supporters. He stuck to these political views throughout the period of struggle for the unification of Italy that followed the revolution of 1848.

  1. What is the difference between a nation and a state? The rise of Nationalism

    In a famous speech at the Crystal Palace in 1872, Disreali redefined the appeal of conservatism across class lines by calling on tradition, patriotism and paternalism, embodied in three key terms: monarchy, empire, and social reform. When he became Prime Minister in 1874, he based his policies on these three principles.

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    In this dual role Parnell was rightfully considered the leader of Irish Nationalism. The fervent activities of The Land League provided the catalyst for Gladstone's second Land Act, which further increased the rights of catholic tenants and provided a tangible reward for The Land War, which was losing momentum.

  1. How far do you agree that it was Cavour's diplomacy rather that Garibaldi's ideas ...

    Garibaldi was unwilling to compromise even under pressure from more powerful figures. Of course, in reading Trevelyan, we must be aware of his romanticist liberalism: 'The events of 1860 should serve as an encouragement to all high endeavour amongst us of a later age, who, with our eyes fixed on

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    In his report, Sir John Bourn, the Comptroller and Auditor General, said the accounting system for soldiers' pay could be accessed by more than 500 people across the country and could be exploited by fraudsters without anyone knowing. No-one had overall responsibility for the pay budget and �16.3 million of soldiers' pay was unaccounted for.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work