• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"By 1942, SEAsian Nationalism was largely a failure." How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"By 1942, SEAsian Nationalism was largely a failure." How far do you agree with this statement? Nationalism is a process whereby the people living in a certain region became more aware of themselves as a distinct group like a nation with a shared purpose, destiny and common goals. Nationalistic movements in SE Asia happened during the period of 1800s to 1942 by which in 1942 and most SE Asian nationalist movements ended up as failures. The statement that "SE Asian Nationalism was largely a failure." is true because by 1942, none of the Nationalist movements had achieved their aim of independence. However despite SE Asian nationalism being largely a failure, nationalism did Asia a service - it helped to raise political, social and economic consciousness amongst the people of SE Asia. ...read more.

Middle

TS: Another reason for the failure of SE Asian nationalism was the over reliance of its members on its leader. Several radical nationalist movements crumpled after the Colonial governments arrested their leaders. Evidence: (i) Saya San Rebellion, led by Saya San himself, lasted for two years from 1930 to mid-1932. The rebellion ended with Saya San's execution. It showed the effectiveness of the British response using the "applying the stick" method, which put the movement to rest. (iii) Sukarno was a leader of the PNI who was charismatic and had excellent oratorical skills. The Dutch imprisoned Sukarno in 1929 and this caused the nationalist movement to integrate by the 1930s. The removal of the key leader most effectively crippled the nationalist movement. Evaluation: The colonial powers managed to cripple various movements and segregated the party by removing the key figures and leaders. ...read more.

Conclusion

SE Asian nationalism was indeed largely a failure due to the disunity within the ranks of various nationalist groups and the response of the Colonial powers with regards to the nationalist movements and rebellions which were poorly organized by these nationalist parties. The colonial response towards the nationalist activities were also well targeted in removing key figures and thus caused the various parties to break up and eventually die out. However despite the major failures SE Asian nationalism faced, it was a turning point for the people in SE Asia as it brought to light issues about independence and being a nation which would have never been realized by the SE Asian people without nationalism. There is no doubt that was largely a failure, as it did not accomplish the goal of independence from the colonial powers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    There had grown up in India generations of professionals and paraprofessionals and a wide range of others with equally needed skills who knew and could work with the British. In 1917, the Colonial Secretary announced in Parliament that it was government policy to place as many Indians as possible in the Burmese administration.

  2. Examine the extent to which the aims of the Beveridge report of 1942 had ...

    The new insurance proposals were specifically the outcome of the Beveridge plan, the outline for unification. The first plan as already stated was that there would be a weekly pay into the insurance scheme. A second plan for insurance was for providing compulsory insurance against disablement as a result of industrial accident.

  1. How far do you agree that it was Cavour's diplomacy rather that Garibaldi's ideas ...

    such as in 1860.The Risorgimento required political expertise and international diplomacy, which were present in Cavour. Although Garibaldi was considered to be a military genius, this quality alone was not and never would be enough to protect Italy from the military superiority of foreign forces; this was evident in 1848 with Garibaldi's Roman Revolt.

  2. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    eventually give him strength to implement his policies, furthermore, to prevent them from becoming a coup and overthrowing his state, which often happens to middle-eastern states. Ataturk managed fulfill this task with great ease as he illustrated that his work was committed national interest and as a result in response

  1. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    Parnell became leader of the established but poorly led IPP in 1880 after five years as an MP. By this time he was also President of the Irish National Land League who instigated The Land War in the early 1880's.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    As a result Gordon Brown, the Chancellor, ruled that the ministry had broken Treasury rules and refused to authorise the overspending (source: The Guardian, 23/1/98). After nearly twenty years of management reform this is a depressing indictment. (iii) The 'Next Steps' Agencies, the Citizens Charter and Market Testing The Efficiency Unit's (1988)

  1. Mazzini's ideas and inspiration transformed attitudes to change in Italy in the 1830's - ...

    According to the Historian Dennis mack smith, Mazzini succeeded in 'defining the goal and arousing enthusiasm among practiced soldiers and statesmen'. He is therefore important, not so much for what he did as much for what he did, but for the way he inspired many young radicals in this period.

  2. 'Internal disunity was the main reason for the failure of Chartism.' To what ...

    The differences between these two very diverse characters led to leadership problems and divisions for the movement, this lack of clear leadership and tactics and methods it was this that many felt resulted in the chartist downfall. Fallouts such as that seen between Bronterre O'Brien and O'Connor over the Land

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work