• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14

Comparative analysis of aboriginal as well as federal government perspective on native self-government in Canada

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Aboriginal right to self-government is the most precious aboriginal right of the First Nations in Canada. Aboriginals themselves understood the concept of self-government as that the Creator gave each people the right to govern its own affairs, as well as land on which to live and with which to sustain their lives (1)( Boldt and Long, 1985). Other human beings cannot take these rights away. However, federal government of Canada does not divide these perceptions with the First Nations. Today the general right of natives to self-government is a right not yet recognized in Canadian law (2).(Havemann, 2000). Meanwhile Canadian officials have been trying to negotiate with the First Nations by implementing different policies towards increased self-government for Indians. However, their attempts have not been achieving successful results due to the fact that Aboriginal and federal government perspectives on native self-government are different. This paper will offer a comparative analysis of aboriginal and federal government standpoints on native self-government. Also, facts of federal government attempts to balance the demands by First Nations for greater control over their internal affairs will be mentioned. To understand properly the development of Aboriginal perspective on native self-government it is helpful to review some history. Thus, before the European settlement it was unknown among the First Nations for one nation to deprive another nation by force of its right to self-determination (3). (Bold and Long, 1985). However, in Europe conquest and domination were frequent occurrences. ...read more.

Middle

------------------------------------- The federal government, however, will not consider the claim of the Coppermine Indians to petroleum under their lands on the basis that they did not make use of it historically, and thus are not considered to have an aboriginal right to it. In analogy to this example, the Arabs of Saudi Arabia should de denied the right to exploit oil resources. In this light federal argument looks silly. Further, the federal government claims that it has all rights in aboriginal areas, although it did not make use of those rights historically. Oddly, the federal government claims that it can make agreements regarding the removal of aboriginal title and rights but that it cannot pass laws recognizing aboriginal title and rights. Another absurd situation arises from a restrictive interpretation of aboriginal rights by the federal government, which concludes that a First Nation can exercise its right only in the precise way they did in pre-settlement times. If a First Nation used bone rather than steel fishhooks, than it can only exercise its aboriginal right to fish with bone hooks. The fact that settlers have been able to move from bone hooks to fishing trawlers in no way mitigates this nonsensical position. Canadians seem to be able to keep permanence of identity and rights despite their technological evolution from horses and buggies to jets. Knickers and three-cornered hats are no longer in fashion. Why must Indian people be limited to a particular anthropological time in order to qualify for exercise of an aboriginal right? ...read more.

Conclusion

The charter would also, within limits, allow bands to pass their own by-laws. However, the process of developing federal government policy on Indian government was significantly reduced due to the fact that federal spending was out of control, as Lambert Commission concluded in1997. As a result of this Commission, federal funding to Indian bands was drastically reduced. While the Ministry of Indian Affairs was trying to encourage and foster the development of autonomous Indian government, it was simultaneously forced by broader policies of government to impose stringent terms and conditions on how money would be spent, how it would be accounted for, and what systems will be put in place at the band level to achieve this accountability. Thus, the Lambert Commission's recommendations on cutting down the federal finding frustrated the Indian government and undermined their trust in federal government In conclusion, the federal government supports a very limited concept of Indian government. Its perception of Indian government is that Indians will exercise the powers the minister now exercises on behalf of Indians. The charter system that that the federal government proposed for the bands can enable a legal foundation to be put in place to allow Indian governments to exercise those powers on behalf of the minister at the reserve level. The implications of the proposed federal government legislation for Indian government mean the following: 'nationhood' is not acceptable; 'sovereignty' is not acceptable; a 'municipal' for Indians is not acceptable; 'institutional' level for Indians is not acceptable. Therefore, there is a wide gap between the Indian concept of Indian government and what the federal government is prepared to negotiate and approve. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Define and discuss an autocratic system of government - While most essays are likely ...

    together all those that do not meet the criteria of democracy as autocratic. Malaysia is a classic example of a developing country that has relatively free democratic elections without fail yet has the stigma of being autocratic. Features such as a tightly controlled media by the government and preventive detention laws present such a case.

  2. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    UK who would be more subject to a kind of rigid Islamization process. One of the reasons was that they faced a hostile racist attitude around them and reassertion of their Islamic identity would form the ideal defense mechanism. This study however may be very specific to the region concerned

  1. Scottish devolution.

    The Westminster Parliament is still the sovereign parliament of the United Kingdom and it retains the power to legislate on any matter, including devolved matters, in Scotland. As the Scotland Act gave specific powers to the Scottish Parliament, the two parliaments currently operate under a system where the Westminster Parliament

  2. Mankind's Inability to Self Govern

    � The final source is strongly supporting the ideology of liberalism. It claims that all men are started out as equal. So long as each man retains inside the law, and does not venture outside it, is free to bring his craft, and his own money, into competition with others

  1. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    for this was to move Turkey away from religious, Islamic influence, which the Turks had been ruled by during the control of the Ottomans. These alterations in the legal system consequently seized the existence of Muslim Sheriah Law, which was the law that was in practice before the reformation.

  2. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    Savimbi officially rejected the vice-presidency in August 96, and remained intransigent about letting government forces establish control in UNITA areas, despite the gradual introduction of UNITA ministers into government positions. Angola is a large physically diverse country with copious natural resources, notably in oil and diamonds.

  1. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    It should be noted that since the Asian economic crisis, Lee Kuan Yew has refrained from using "Asian values" because many critics especially in the West have faulted the crisis on these values. In his new book, From Third World to First - The Singapore Story 1965-2000, he points out

  2. Should western Canada separate from the rest of Canada?

    This problem cannot be resolved in any way because one way or the other, a large portion of Canada will remain unhappy. The only solution for such an issue would be for Canada to separate into two self-governing nations so that each nation can be dealt with appropriately.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work