• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14

Comparative analysis of aboriginal as well as federal government perspective on native self-government in Canada

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Aboriginal right to self-government is the most precious aboriginal right of the First Nations in Canada. Aboriginals themselves understood the concept of self-government as that the Creator gave each people the right to govern its own affairs, as well as land on which to live and with which to sustain their lives (1)( Boldt and Long, 1985). Other human beings cannot take these rights away. However, federal government of Canada does not divide these perceptions with the First Nations. Today the general right of natives to self-government is a right not yet recognized in Canadian law (2).(Havemann, 2000). Meanwhile Canadian officials have been trying to negotiate with the First Nations by implementing different policies towards increased self-government for Indians. However, their attempts have not been achieving successful results due to the fact that Aboriginal and federal government perspectives on native self-government are different. This paper will offer a comparative analysis of aboriginal and federal government standpoints on native self-government. Also, facts of federal government attempts to balance the demands by First Nations for greater control over their internal affairs will be mentioned. To understand properly the development of Aboriginal perspective on native self-government it is helpful to review some history. Thus, before the European settlement it was unknown among the First Nations for one nation to deprive another nation by force of its right to self-determination (3). (Bold and Long, 1985). However, in Europe conquest and domination were frequent occurrences. ...read more.

Middle

------------------------------------- The federal government, however, will not consider the claim of the Coppermine Indians to petroleum under their lands on the basis that they did not make use of it historically, and thus are not considered to have an aboriginal right to it. In analogy to this example, the Arabs of Saudi Arabia should de denied the right to exploit oil resources. In this light federal argument looks silly. Further, the federal government claims that it has all rights in aboriginal areas, although it did not make use of those rights historically. Oddly, the federal government claims that it can make agreements regarding the removal of aboriginal title and rights but that it cannot pass laws recognizing aboriginal title and rights. Another absurd situation arises from a restrictive interpretation of aboriginal rights by the federal government, which concludes that a First Nation can exercise its right only in the precise way they did in pre-settlement times. If a First Nation used bone rather than steel fishhooks, than it can only exercise its aboriginal right to fish with bone hooks. The fact that settlers have been able to move from bone hooks to fishing trawlers in no way mitigates this nonsensical position. Canadians seem to be able to keep permanence of identity and rights despite their technological evolution from horses and buggies to jets. Knickers and three-cornered hats are no longer in fashion. Why must Indian people be limited to a particular anthropological time in order to qualify for exercise of an aboriginal right? ...read more.

Conclusion

The charter would also, within limits, allow bands to pass their own by-laws. However, the process of developing federal government policy on Indian government was significantly reduced due to the fact that federal spending was out of control, as Lambert Commission concluded in1997. As a result of this Commission, federal funding to Indian bands was drastically reduced. While the Ministry of Indian Affairs was trying to encourage and foster the development of autonomous Indian government, it was simultaneously forced by broader policies of government to impose stringent terms and conditions on how money would be spent, how it would be accounted for, and what systems will be put in place at the band level to achieve this accountability. Thus, the Lambert Commission's recommendations on cutting down the federal finding frustrated the Indian government and undermined their trust in federal government In conclusion, the federal government supports a very limited concept of Indian government. Its perception of Indian government is that Indians will exercise the powers the minister now exercises on behalf of Indians. The charter system that that the federal government proposed for the bands can enable a legal foundation to be put in place to allow Indian governments to exercise those powers on behalf of the minister at the reserve level. The implications of the proposed federal government legislation for Indian government mean the following: 'nationhood' is not acceptable; 'sovereignty' is not acceptable; a 'municipal' for Indians is not acceptable; 'institutional' level for Indians is not acceptable. Therefore, there is a wide gap between the Indian concept of Indian government and what the federal government is prepared to negotiate and approve. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    Finally, contrary to Conservatives, who wanted to maintain constitution largely unchanged, the New Labour government introduced devolution in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. As Blair said, "As for devolution, they (conservatives) said it would break up the UK. The UK has not broken, what has broken is the appeal of separatism and of nationalism" (news.bbc.co.uk, May 4,2004).

  2. Define and discuss an autocratic system of government - While most essays are likely ...

    Regardless, some states perhaps find it suitable to do so. I would like to take my country, Malaysia, as an example as to why there are different perspectives on the countries' style of democracy and government. There are varying forms of democracy and one has to be cautious in grouping

  1. Nationalism as applied to business

    The party's fortunes arose primarily in the 1990s, with the frustration of the people with over 40 years of Congress domination, corruption, sycophant leaders and lack of direction. Ethnic nationalist parties include the Shiromani Akali Dal, which is closely identified with the creation of a Sikh-majority state in Punjab and includes many Sikh religious leaders in its organization.

  2. "The Creator Of The Welfare State." How Well Deserved Is This Description Of The ...

    The National Assistance Act provided further cover for those who were disabled, old aged, sick or of any other special needs, acting as a "safety net." The problem with this, however, was that benefits were not set high enough and so National Assistance boards were flooded with applications for extra benefit, creating great strain on the available funds.

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    The churches were also pressed by the poverty and exploitation suffered by their congregations. Finally new political parties offered the possibility for alternative state structures and thus political action. The churches filled a political vacuum that had been caused by the fact that no black opposition was allowed and no white opposition outside the churches existed.

  2. Mankind's Inability to Self Govern

    � The final source is strongly supporting the ideology of liberalism. It claims that all men are started out as equal. So long as each man retains inside the law, and does not venture outside it, is free to bring his craft, and his own money, into competition with others

  1. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    land Adivasis on the one hand and linguistic minorities like the Biharis on the other. The section below attempts to sketch the evolution of the Bangladesh state with respect to the evolution of religious and linguistic-racial ideology espoused by the state.

  2. Legislators have three essential functions: representation, law-making and control of the executive. How does ...

    Although most of the bills are introduced by the government the members of the Bundestag can indeed suggest such. Nevertheless, they cannot make a draft of a bill, therefore they pass it to government to prepare one. After that follows a first reading; this is to inform the members themselves

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work