• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in the UK and US

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Tanvi Thanki 0255878 GV1200 Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power In the UK and US 'Power is an inherently unequal relationship comprising an attempt to by one person or group to secure compliance from or enforce dependence upon another person or group' (Stephen Lukes). In a pluralist political system, it is impossible for any one group to dominate all of government. Government is responsive to a plurality of groups which represent a plurality of interests and control diverse political resources. 'Among the constant fats to be found in all political systems, one is so obvious that it is apparent to the most casual eye: in all societies two classes of people appear-a class that rules and a class that is ruled (Mosca). In this essay I will look at the similarities and differences of pluralism and the ruling elite in both the UK and in the US. Pluralism being that not one single group can be in power and the ruling elite theory states that there is only one group in power, which also shares a common set of interests. ...read more.

Middle

They can also buy shares in companies to wield ownership rights. Government can also consult the people directly through referenda and local elections. In the US, the parties are more decentralized which makes them weaker as the political power is more spread out, so they do not benefit form power of numbers. Whereas the UK, the parties are more centralized, which makes them stronger. The UK do benefit from power of numbers. 'Elitism' is the name usually given to a theory associated with a group of social scientists who wrote in Europe in the latter decades of the nineteenth and the early decades of the present century. The social scientists such as Gaetano Mosca, Vilfredo Pareto and Robert Michels, did not have identical views they just shared common concerns and were concerned with many common historical problems: hence they are usually grouped together into the category of elitists. The power in elitism is more concentrated than it is with pluralism, in which power is diffused. ...read more.

Conclusion

green peace and students. So, for anyone to enter they just have to believe in what they are arguing for. Pluralists can fight for what they believe in whenever they want to. Lobbying helps the group gets there views and opinions across to the government, if the group believe strongly enough in what they are fighting for, the politicians in power may eventually agree with what the groups have to say. The ruling elites are different in the way that the decisions cannot be altered by any pressure groups. Once they have made a decision they stick to it. Even though many people's views and opinions are not listened to, the people also want to be ruled by elite. They have a psychological need to identify rulers and to follow them. The similarities they both have, is that they are parties of power. They have the power to change things going on in the country. They both make decisions in order to do better for their own country. Although decisions are made in different ways and by different people, overall pluralists and the ruling elite make decisions on what they think is best for themselves and for the people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Essay title: Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in ...

    It can be seen as a minority which governs in its own interest and is unaccountable to the majority. It is defined by the possession of three characteristics: consciousness, coherence and conspiracy. Consciousness refers to the awareness of common interests, coherence means that it shares a common interest and conspiracy describes the capacity to act collectively.

  2. The Uk policy making process.

    of Government policy, there is no real opportunity for the Government to be defeated. This mechanism of Adjournment Motions may also be used to allow the House of Commons as a whole to express its view on subjects for which the Government has no particular policy or which are very

  1. 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

    and played a part in the attacks by putting the explosives on the steel frames but this was disagreed with by many as he was in the building at the time of the attack. Although some suggest he was also involved in the plane hijackings some decided that he wasn't,

  2. Compare and contrast the elitist and pluralist accounts of political power

    Pluralists would argue that in modern societies, such as these, there exists a plurality of interests and if sufficient political pluralism exists, in terms of free speech, free and fair elections and so on, it will be impossible for any one group to dominate all of government.

  1. The Plurality System.

    relatively evenly spread from one part of the country to another' this statement means that they will find it difficult to gain a majority vote in areas where they have support, because its so widespread, the support is too little.

  2. Politics and Power notes on the UK system

    MPs in the House of Commons By-election When a commons seat becomes vacant, eg through a death or retirement of a sitting MP MP in the House of Commons European election Every five years MEPs- Member of the European Parliament Local elections eg county council Every four years Local Councillors

  1. 'Liberal pluralist views of policy making are hopelessly naïve.' Discuss.

    Pluralists argue that decisions are achieved by 'partisan mutual adjustment', which includes negotiation and bargaining between different interests and there is close linkage between small changes and mutual adjustment. However, because of the unequal distribution of power, policy-making may be incremental, but sometimes not involving mutual adjustment, it is dominated

  2. Russia - political past, present and future

    By the end of year 1993 Yeltsin drafted a new constitution together with new parliamentary elections. The new constitution outlined the new type of government, which was called the "presidential republic". The new system was federal, in which many parts of Russia were divided into autonomous regions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work