• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the elitist and pluralist accounts of political power

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the elitist and pluralist accounts of political power Robert Dahl in 1957 formalised a definition of power to be 'the ability of A to get B to do something which B would not otherwise do'. In the political sense we may think of power as the right of some person or institution to make important public decisions affecting the state or community as a whole. John Kingdom. Government Politics in Britain an Introduction (Cambridge: Policy Press, 1992), 6-7. In this essay I will look in some detail at two contrasting theories of political systems, namely pluralism and elitism, in order to come to some conclusion about the relative power citizens with regards to their ability to influence public policy. I will begin by providing a brief overview of these two accounts of power and then move on to talk about the similarities and differences with regards to who exercises power, how feasible entry into the political system is and how democratic each of the two systems appears to be. Finally I will conclude by looking at the application of these theories to the western world and evaluate their portrayal of political power. The roots of pluralism can be traced back to the 18th century when the French philosopher Motesqview put forward an early notion of political pluralism. ...read more.

Middle

However between elections the ruling elite will have greater opportunity to dominate the political resources and hence exercise greater powers. Similarly both elitists and pluralist provide different accounts of how political power is distributed through society. Pluralists would argue that power is in fact dispersed through society between groups of individuals who in tern have the ability to affect the policy decisions. This is not to say that power is divided equally between interest groups. Indeed some groups will be larger, be better organised and have greater access to 'policy-making' circles and so in effect exercise more power than others. Barrie Axford et all, Politics an Introduction, 417. The key idea here is that there are multiple sources of power. In contrast elite theorists would state that in practice power will inevitably 'fall into the hands of a few'. They see political resources as being dominated by a minority through their skilful utilisation. A study by C Wright Mills in the 1950s would appear to strengthen this argument since he concluded that critical political decisions in America were being made at that time by a 'power elite'. John Kindom. Government Politics in Britain an Introduction, 431. The relative sharing of power within a pluralistic system emphasises the role of interest groups in shaping policy. ...read more.

Conclusion

GIP Introduction to Comparative Politics. Indeed it could be argued that representatives of interest groups are elites themselves and on that basis will prefer to deal with other elites. John Esberey; Larry Johnston, Democracy and the state ( Ontario: Broadview press ltd, 1994 ), 193. In this way we may think, as Schumpeter did, that democracy can still exist in the form of 'democratic elitism' where elites are required to compete for the popular vote of the masses. Barrie Axford; Gary K, Browning, Politics an Introduction, 119. This would seam a more reasonable theory in societies like the UK and US where evidently there are strong factions between groups of elites themselves. It could be argued that the expansion in ICT over the last decade or could in the future facilitate direct democracy although in today's would it would seam that on balance the elite account of power seams more realistic. That is not to say that elitism is provides all the answers. In the US it is difficult to identify a single elite that is able to dominate all of government and in the case of the UK there would seam to be little coherence between groups of elites themselves. Providing that elected elites are accountable to the masses and are elected regularly then it would seam the elitist account of political power can be democratic. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    Regardless of religion and ethnicity, the entire population was to abide by these laws and ultimately coincide and coexist together, encouraging homogeneity like all other Western countries. Furthermore, Ataturk got rid of the wearing of Fez's, as it was a symbol of Ottoman rule.

  2. 'Liberal pluralist views of policy making are hopelessly naïve.' Discuss.

    In reality, mutual adjustment are involved in some ordinary issues such as abortion and education issues, but grand issues either are dominated by certain groups or excluded from agenda since they are so taken for granted that it is impossible to challenge them.

  1. 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

    someone got a lot of money when the towers were bought down. Also, when it was finished in 1973 it was designed to withstand fires and air attacks, this it did when in 1975 there was a fire that destroyed the 11th floor, in 1993 the north tower was attacked by a truck filled with explosives.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Pluralism in domestic politics

    Good support for this statement would be a quote from Barack Husein Obama's victory speech. He said "If there is anyone out there who still doubts, that America is a place where all things are possible, who still wonders if the dream of our founders is still alive in our

  1. Politics and Power notes on the UK system

    Hence all opinions and interests can be heard. These groups allow us to participate in the political process and to influence the decision-making process. Pressure groups allow the Government to keep in touch with the views of the people of the country.

  2. What is Politics

    Suppose the government proposed a law in Britain. This proposal would be debated in Cabinet and in Parliament. Interest groups would lobby MPs. There might be demonstrations for or against the proposal. Eventually, the proposal might pass through Parliament, gain royal assent and become law. In this decision making process, decision are made mainly in the open, subject

  1. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    * Political and legal equality o Equality before law o Equality of opportunity, but not of outcome o Retain a characteristic Liberal interest individual rights and civil liberties o Liberal Welfare policies o Strong commitment to constitutional reform o Internationalist, humanitarian interest in foreign affairs o Not overtly liberal o Do they co-operate or compete with Labour?

  2. In comparison to Germany's relative political stability, what variables can be identified in order ...

    The German system benefited from the support of the East Germans for their successful incumbent government. For the Italians the removal of the Communist scare fragmented rather than consolidated party support. Table 1: Election to the lower German House Results - 1949-1998 Year Turnout % (of total vote)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work