• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the purpose of elections in the political systems of Britain and America.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the purpose of elections in the political systems of Britain and America. Elections are a means by which people exercise some degree of control over their representatives. Ideally elections should provide the opportunity for a peaceful succession and transfer of office. In fact, in recent history, elections of one form or another have been the most characteristic and widespread form of rotating and transferring office. There has been tremendous variation amongst political systems of what is considered to be an elective office and the form that it should take. Before we can begin to explore the differences or similarities in the purpose of elections in Britain and the US we must first concentrate on what the electorate in each country votes for. In the US the have a federal system of government where the president is chosen by the electorate to represent them and their interest in the executive, the president and the vice-president are the only two politicians to be elected by a national constituency. They campaign for two months, starting after the Labor Day holiday in September but these campaigns rarely make a difference to which candidate wins because most of the electorate have already made up their minds and it is rare that a candidate who is ...read more.

Middle

to have a layer of government which deals with the needs of that region instead of Westminster managing all of that regions affairs and policies. There are a number of key dates in the creation of the Scottish Parliament. Regarding the creations of a Scottish parliament a Referendum on 11 September 1997 showed Westminster that the Scottish electorate were largely in favour of the creation of a Scottish Parliament with tax varying powers.. The result of this was the Scotland Act 1998, which received Royal Assent on 19 November 1998. The Act provided "for the establishment of a Scottish Parliament", and gave the Secretary of State for Scotland the power to decide the date of the first election. This shows that another purpose for elections is the right to choose what is best for ones region as a whole not just voting selfishly for what one can get out of a party if it is elected to power. In order for there to be a purpose for an election it is paramount that a political party or a campaigner attempts to makes sure that as many of the electorate as possible turn out to the ballot stations to vote; especially the electorate that are most likely to support them. ...read more.

Conclusion

According to official literature published by parliament "Fair and free elections are an essential part of democracy, allowing citizens to determine how they want their country to be governed."2 But in reality is this what happens? Is not the purpose of voting to the electorate a means by which they can receive benefits on a more personal level, such as lower tax, cheaper goods or a higher standard of living. Unless however the individual voter is attached to a political party or has strong political views, for example the voter may be deeply concerned about vehicle emissions in urban areas and hence would be more likely to vote for a party, president or congressman who designed a manifesto policy before the elections to try and tackle that problem. But in conclusion the purpose for elections especially in Britain and America is not designed to pursue the individuals needs or desires but the status quo, how the electorate collectively wish their country to be run but in turn not forgetting how the electorate with their country to be run on a local level. In the political systems of Britain and America, they both cater for this. 1 Polsby and Wildavsky, 1995, p.162 2 http://www.explore.parliament.uk/teachers/pdfs/es01.pdf (Parliament Explained 1 - Parliamentary Elections) Paul Charles Gaffney ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Essay title: Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in ...

    Today there are pluralist influences as well as pluralist essences in both the US and UK politics. They both have social pluralism, according to sheer sizes of their citizens with different interests, ethnics or religions; this also prevents everyone from taking part in the government and instead, a representative is chosen to govern on behalf of the people.

  2. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    This had a political umbrella group which could represent the interests of unions in Parliament. A group that would seek to encompass the TUC, the ILP and other socialist and friendly societies. The result of the meeting would be the formation of the Labour Representation Committee (LRC)

  1. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    United Kingdom than by staying inside, for example, by taking over the oil revenues in its sector of the North sea or securing direct subsidies from the European Union. This position is summarised in its slogans "it's Scotland's oil" and "Scotland in Europe".

  2. The problem of illegal immigration in America.

    billion on an estimated 13 million undocumented residents whereas Obama estimated that there are 11 million. (Illegal Immigration.... Finds). This proves that more than $110 billion are being paid for illegal related costs and that the number of illegal immigrants in USA are more than the number assumed.

  1. Do Elections guarantee Democracy?

    The current FPTP system is insufficiently representative as it undermines the basic concept of human rights. The main objective of a representative government is to ensure that al sections of society have a say in the formation and conduct of the current government.

  2. Russia - political past, present and future

    The radical process began as more and more countries gained autonomy and finally independence, which brought the eighty-year continuation of the communistic autocracy to the end. That was a second sufficient example, which proved that totalitarian system whether czarist or communistic would never work in a long run.

  1. Assess the factors that determine the outcome of US Presidential elections

    (Candidates may run for office without the support of a political party, as Independents). Once the candidates are chosen, with the backing of PAC's (Political Action Committees - whose primary function is to help finance election contests), candidates now tend to run their own campaigns, since the role of parties in electioneering has somewhat diminished in recent years.

  2. The Conservative party ruled Britain from1886 until 1905, however they lost the 1906 elections.

    It made underlying problems of British society come to the surface, and they were problems that the Conservative party didn't offer solutions to. After the Boer war ended, the people were blaming the government for military incompetence, as the war had gone on a lot longer then was expected and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work