• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the purpose of elections in the political systems of Britain and America.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the purpose of elections in the political systems of Britain and America. Elections are a means by which people exercise some degree of control over their representatives. Ideally elections should provide the opportunity for a peaceful succession and transfer of office. In fact, in recent history, elections of one form or another have been the most characteristic and widespread form of rotating and transferring office. There has been tremendous variation amongst political systems of what is considered to be an elective office and the form that it should take. Before we can begin to explore the differences or similarities in the purpose of elections in Britain and the US we must first concentrate on what the electorate in each country votes for. In the US the have a federal system of government where the president is chosen by the electorate to represent them and their interest in the executive, the president and the vice-president are the only two politicians to be elected by a national constituency. They campaign for two months, starting after the Labor Day holiday in September but these campaigns rarely make a difference to which candidate wins because most of the electorate have already made up their minds and it is rare that a candidate who is ...read more.

Middle

to have a layer of government which deals with the needs of that region instead of Westminster managing all of that regions affairs and policies. There are a number of key dates in the creation of the Scottish Parliament. Regarding the creations of a Scottish parliament a Referendum on 11 September 1997 showed Westminster that the Scottish electorate were largely in favour of the creation of a Scottish Parliament with tax varying powers.. The result of this was the Scotland Act 1998, which received Royal Assent on 19 November 1998. The Act provided "for the establishment of a Scottish Parliament", and gave the Secretary of State for Scotland the power to decide the date of the first election. This shows that another purpose for elections is the right to choose what is best for ones region as a whole not just voting selfishly for what one can get out of a party if it is elected to power. In order for there to be a purpose for an election it is paramount that a political party or a campaigner attempts to makes sure that as many of the electorate as possible turn out to the ballot stations to vote; especially the electorate that are most likely to support them. ...read more.

Conclusion

According to official literature published by parliament "Fair and free elections are an essential part of democracy, allowing citizens to determine how they want their country to be governed."2 But in reality is this what happens? Is not the purpose of voting to the electorate a means by which they can receive benefits on a more personal level, such as lower tax, cheaper goods or a higher standard of living. Unless however the individual voter is attached to a political party or has strong political views, for example the voter may be deeply concerned about vehicle emissions in urban areas and hence would be more likely to vote for a party, president or congressman who designed a manifesto policy before the elections to try and tackle that problem. But in conclusion the purpose for elections especially in Britain and America is not designed to pursue the individuals needs or desires but the status quo, how the electorate collectively wish their country to be run but in turn not forgetting how the electorate with their country to be run on a local level. In the political systems of Britain and America, they both cater for this. 1 Polsby and Wildavsky, 1995, p.162 2 http://www.explore.parliament.uk/teachers/pdfs/es01.pdf (Parliament Explained 1 - Parliamentary Elections) Paul Charles Gaffney ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Essay title: Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in ...

    Today there are pluralist influences as well as pluralist essences in both the US and UK politics. They both have social pluralism, according to sheer sizes of their citizens with different interests, ethnics or religions; this also prevents everyone from taking part in the government and instead, a representative is chosen to govern on behalf of the people.

  2. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    With a Stronger lead from the new Labour Government, the proposal for a much stronger Assembly with power to tax was approved by a convincing majority in September 1997 when two-third of Scottish voters voted for a parliament with powers of taxation, with a majority in all areas of the country.

  1. The problem of illegal immigration in America.

    billion on an estimated 13 million undocumented residents whereas Obama estimated that there are 11 million. (Illegal Immigration.... Finds). This proves that more than $110 billion are being paid for illegal related costs and that the number of illegal immigrants in USA are more than the number assumed.

  2. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    He represented a tradition that passed away with him. His contemporaries recognized his greatness as a statesman. He combined a realism and clarity of view with a fundamentally ethical approach to diplomacy, which sought to conciliate and pacify while maintaining important national interests.

  1. Compare and contrast the elitist and pluralist accounts of political power

    BBC News, 'Million march against Iraq war', Feb. 16. 2003: news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2765041.stm. Dahl criticised the concept of a small minority being able to dominate all decisions deeming it unrealistic and too much of a generalisation. Through his own studies he found that elites themselves would often recruit others from outside the

  2. The Conservative party ruled Britain from1886 until 1905, however they lost the 1906 elections.

    race differently, especially since slavery had fairly recently been abolished so the issue of inequality was still fresh in people's minds. Trade unionists also objected to it, as they reasoned that if the British Government let it happen in one of Britain's colonies, they might quite easily extend the practice

  1. Compare and Contrast how the Conservative and Labour 1997 manifestos use rhetorical language to ...

    The Conservative manifesto is written in the third person narrative voice (the manifesto uses the inclusive pronoun - "we..."). The Conservatives also attempt to make their manifesto seem factual, "The Conservatives are among the most successful in British peacetime history".

  2. The Scottish Parliament despite its powers has been a political disappointment, whereas the Welsh ...

    In 1997 there was an incredibly close result with around 50% voting 'yes' to devolution with only 50% turnout, this means that only 25% of the total population of Wales voted 'yes' to devolution that was then implemented. This shows how the Welsh Assembly had an incredibly weak support from

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work