• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the purpose of elections in the political systems of Britain and America.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the purpose of elections in the political systems of Britain and America. Elections are a means by which people exercise some degree of control over their representatives. Ideally elections should provide the opportunity for a peaceful succession and transfer of office. In fact, in recent history, elections of one form or another have been the most characteristic and widespread form of rotating and transferring office. There has been tremendous variation amongst political systems of what is considered to be an elective office and the form that it should take. Before we can begin to explore the differences or similarities in the purpose of elections in Britain and the US we must first concentrate on what the electorate in each country votes for. In the US the have a federal system of government where the president is chosen by the electorate to represent them and their interest in the executive, the president and the vice-president are the only two politicians to be elected by a national constituency. They campaign for two months, starting after the Labor Day holiday in September but these campaigns rarely make a difference to which candidate wins because most of the electorate have already made up their minds and it is rare that a candidate who is ...read more.

Middle

to have a layer of government which deals with the needs of that region instead of Westminster managing all of that regions affairs and policies. There are a number of key dates in the creation of the Scottish Parliament. Regarding the creations of a Scottish parliament a Referendum on 11 September 1997 showed Westminster that the Scottish electorate were largely in favour of the creation of a Scottish Parliament with tax varying powers.. The result of this was the Scotland Act 1998, which received Royal Assent on 19 November 1998. The Act provided "for the establishment of a Scottish Parliament", and gave the Secretary of State for Scotland the power to decide the date of the first election. This shows that another purpose for elections is the right to choose what is best for ones region as a whole not just voting selfishly for what one can get out of a party if it is elected to power. In order for there to be a purpose for an election it is paramount that a political party or a campaigner attempts to makes sure that as many of the electorate as possible turn out to the ballot stations to vote; especially the electorate that are most likely to support them. ...read more.

Conclusion

According to official literature published by parliament "Fair and free elections are an essential part of democracy, allowing citizens to determine how they want their country to be governed."2 But in reality is this what happens? Is not the purpose of voting to the electorate a means by which they can receive benefits on a more personal level, such as lower tax, cheaper goods or a higher standard of living. Unless however the individual voter is attached to a political party or has strong political views, for example the voter may be deeply concerned about vehicle emissions in urban areas and hence would be more likely to vote for a party, president or congressman who designed a manifesto policy before the elections to try and tackle that problem. But in conclusion the purpose for elections especially in Britain and America is not designed to pursue the individuals needs or desires but the status quo, how the electorate collectively wish their country to be run but in turn not forgetting how the electorate with their country to be run on a local level. In the political systems of Britain and America, they both cater for this. 1 Polsby and Wildavsky, 1995, p.162 2 http://www.explore.parliament.uk/teachers/pdfs/es01.pdf (Parliament Explained 1 - Parliamentary Elections) Paul Charles Gaffney ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Essay title: Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in ...

    Today there are pluralist influences as well as pluralist essences in both the US and UK politics. They both have social pluralism, according to sheer sizes of their citizens with different interests, ethnics or religions; this also prevents everyone from taking part in the government and instead, a representative is chosen to govern on behalf of the people.

  2. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    This had a political umbrella group which could represent the interests of unions in Parliament. A group that would seek to encompass the TUC, the ILP and other socialist and friendly societies. The result of the meeting would be the formation of the Labour Representation Committee (LRC)

  1. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    see: the creation of the parliament now being put in place by Labour, with powers over Scottish home affairs. The Scottish Referendum of 1979, called to vote on a proposal to set up a Scottish Assembly, approved it by 51.6 per cent.

  2. Evaluate strengths and weaknesses of various voting systems regarding voting

    There are two main systems of PR - the List system and the Single Transferable Vote system. The list system comes closer to achieving the first aim whilst the STV system is closer to achieving the second aim. 1. The List system This system involves multi- member constituencies.

  1. Russia - political past, present and future

    The Federation Council might object, and then the document is moved to a special committee consisted of both Duma and Federation Council representatives where disagreements are being negotiated. If the negotiation process fails, the Duma has a right to override the Federation Council by a two-thirds majority vote and place the document on the president's desk.

  2. The Conservative party ruled Britain from1886 until 1905, however they lost the 1906 elections.

    However the party was not exactly the same as they had changed some of their ideas and 'New Liberalism' was now what the majority of the party believed in. 'New Liberalism,' was the belief that the state had a duty to be actively involved in the lives of its citizens,

  1. The problem of illegal immigration in America.

    Most of these children will pay tax when they grow up but their parents do not pay taxes. VI. Cost of Illegal Immigration The cost of harboring illegal immigrants in the United States is a staggering $113 billion a year - an average of $117 for every "native-headed" household in

  2. Do Elections guarantee Democracy?

    How could Tony Blair say what he had said when in theory he is only representing 44% of those people who voted. So the other 56% of those who voted were not being represented. You don't have to be a genius to work out that that is not being very democratic.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work